Does the Inverted Kidney Transplantation Technique Promote the Feasibility and Safety of Right Living Donor Nephrectomy?

IF 1 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Nasreldin Mohammed, Mohammed Ali Zarzour, Amr Mostafa Abdelgawad, Hamdy Mohammed Ibrahim, Paolo Fornara, Rabea Ahmed Gadelkareem
{"title":"Does the Inverted Kidney Transplantation Technique Promote the Feasibility and Safety of Right Living Donor Nephrectomy?","authors":"Nasreldin Mohammed,&nbsp;Mohammed Ali Zarzour,&nbsp;Amr Mostafa Abdelgawad,&nbsp;Hamdy Mohammed Ibrahim,&nbsp;Paolo Fornara,&nbsp;Rabea Ahmed Gadelkareem","doi":"10.5152/tud.2022.22108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of right- and left-sided live donor nephrectomies using the inverted kidney transplantation technique for right live donor nephrectomy on transplantation.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective review was done for the cases of live donor nephrectomy, either as open donor nephrectomy or laparoscopic donor nephrectomy between 2004 and 2019. Inverted kidney transplantation was used with right-sided grafts. The variables of the right- and left-sided live donor nephrectomies were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 202 live donor nephrectomies including 71 (35.1%) open donor nephrectomies and 131 (64.9%) laparoscopic donor nephrectomies with 4 cases of conversion to open donor nephrectomy. There were 119 (58.9%) right-sided and 83 (41.1%) left-sided live donor nephrectomies with insignificantly different mean operative time (123 and 127 minutes; P=.09), mean warm ischemia time (82.3 and 84.5 seconds; P=.32), and mean blood loss (73 and 78 mL; P=.18), respectively. Inverted kidney transplantation was performed for 86% of grafts from right live donor nephrectomies. Discharge from hospital was on an average of 4.3 days postoperatively. There were only 3 complications (1 in right live donor nephrectomy and 2 in left live donor nephrectomies) with grade 2 according to Clavien-Dindo Classification. Incidence of delayed graft function (P=.09), transplant vein thrombosis (1 case in each group), 1-year graft survival rate (93.2% vs. 94.8%; P=.12), and 1-year serum creatinine levels (1.4 ± 0.3 vs. 1.3 ± 0.2; P=.09) revealed statistically insignificant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regardless of the surgical technique, the right live donor nephrectomy seems to be technically as safe as the left live donor nephrectomy for both the donors and the recipients. Using inverted kidney transplantation provided convenient extensions of graft's vessels to full length with no significant increased incidence of vascular thrombosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23366,"journal":{"name":"Turkish journal of urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9612694/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish journal of urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2022.22108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of right- and left-sided live donor nephrectomies using the inverted kidney transplantation technique for right live donor nephrectomy on transplantation.

Material and methods: A retrospective review was done for the cases of live donor nephrectomy, either as open donor nephrectomy or laparoscopic donor nephrectomy between 2004 and 2019. Inverted kidney transplantation was used with right-sided grafts. The variables of the right- and left-sided live donor nephrectomies were compared.

Results: There were 202 live donor nephrectomies including 71 (35.1%) open donor nephrectomies and 131 (64.9%) laparoscopic donor nephrectomies with 4 cases of conversion to open donor nephrectomy. There were 119 (58.9%) right-sided and 83 (41.1%) left-sided live donor nephrectomies with insignificantly different mean operative time (123 and 127 minutes; P=.09), mean warm ischemia time (82.3 and 84.5 seconds; P=.32), and mean blood loss (73 and 78 mL; P=.18), respectively. Inverted kidney transplantation was performed for 86% of grafts from right live donor nephrectomies. Discharge from hospital was on an average of 4.3 days postoperatively. There were only 3 complications (1 in right live donor nephrectomy and 2 in left live donor nephrectomies) with grade 2 according to Clavien-Dindo Classification. Incidence of delayed graft function (P=.09), transplant vein thrombosis (1 case in each group), 1-year graft survival rate (93.2% vs. 94.8%; P=.12), and 1-year serum creatinine levels (1.4 ± 0.3 vs. 1.3 ± 0.2; P=.09) revealed statistically insignificant differences.

Conclusion: Regardless of the surgical technique, the right live donor nephrectomy seems to be technically as safe as the left live donor nephrectomy for both the donors and the recipients. Using inverted kidney transplantation provided convenient extensions of graft's vessels to full length with no significant increased incidence of vascular thrombosis.

Abstract Image

倒置肾移植技术是否促进右侧活体肾切除术的可行性和安全性?
目的:本研究的目的是比较采用倒肾移植技术的右侧活体肾切除术和左侧活体肾切除术的移植效果。材料和方法:回顾性分析2004年至2019年期间进行活体供肾切除术的病例,包括开放供肾切除术和腹腔镜供肾切除术。逆行肾移植与右侧移植相结合。比较左、右侧供体活体肾切除术的各项指标。结果:202例活体供肾切除术,其中开放供肾71例(占35.1%),腹腔镜供肾131例(占64.9%),其中4例转为开放供肾切除术。右侧活体肾切除术119例(58.9%),左侧活体肾切除术83例(41.1%),平均手术时间(123分钟和127分钟)差异无统计学意义;P=.09),平均热缺血时间分别为82.3秒和84.5秒;P=.32),平均失血量(73和78 mL;分别P =)。右侧活体供体肾切除术后,86%的移植物进行了倒肾移植。术后平均4.3天出院。术后并发症3例(右侧活体肾切除术1例,左侧活体肾切除术2例),按Clavien-Dindo分级为2级。移植物功能延迟发生率(P= 0.09)、移植物静脉血栓发生率(每组1例)、1年移植物存活率(93.2% vs. 94.8%;P=.12), 1年血清肌酐水平(1.4±0.3 vs. 1.3±0.2;P=.09),差异无统计学意义。结论:无论何种手术技术,从技术上讲,无论是对供体还是受体,右侧活体肾切除术似乎与左侧活体肾切除术一样安全。采用倒置肾移植可以方便地将移植物血管延伸至全长,而血管血栓的发生率没有明显增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish journal of urology
Turkish journal of urology Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The aim of the Turkish Journal of Urology is to contribute to the literature by publishing scientifically high-quality research articles as well as reviews, editorials, letters to the editor and case reports. The journal’s target audience includes, urology specialists, medical specialty fellows and other specialists and practitioners who are interested in the field of urology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信