Value of Geriatric Assessment Using the G8 to Predict Postoperative Urinary Tract Infections in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy.

IF 1 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Shugo Yajima, Yasukazu Nakanishi, Yousuke Umino, Naoya Ookubo, Kenji Tanabe, Madoka Kataoka, Hitoshi Masuda
{"title":"Value of Geriatric Assessment Using the G8 to Predict Postoperative Urinary Tract Infections in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy.","authors":"Shugo Yajima,&nbsp;Yasukazu Nakanishi,&nbsp;Yousuke Umino,&nbsp;Naoya Ookubo,&nbsp;Kenji Tanabe,&nbsp;Madoka Kataoka,&nbsp;Hitoshi Masuda","doi":"10.5152/tud.2022.22069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Urinary tract infection is one of the most common and distressing complications of radical cystectomy with urinary diversion. This study aimed to elucidate the usefulness of the geriatric-8 screening tool for predicting postoperative complications, especially urinary tract infections, in patients who underwent radical cystectomy with urinary diversion.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Ninety-one patients with bladder cancer who underwent radical cystectomy with urinary diversion were assessed for geriatric-8 and classified into 3 groups according to their geriatric-8 score: 14 as the high score group. We retrospectively analyzed the association between geriatric-8 score and postoperative complications classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of the patients was 75 years (interquartile range 71-80 years) and 75 (82%) were male; 41 of the patients (45%) had high geriatric-8 score (>14), 40 of the patients (44%) had intermediate geriatric-8 score (11-14), and 10 of the patients (11%) had low geriatric-8 score (< 11). In multivariate analysis, low score of geriatric-8 was independently associated with the occurrence of grade 2 or higher urinary tract infection within 30 days [odds ratio=5.9; 95% CI=1.2-30.3; P=.03], along with female [odds ratio=6.1; 95% CI=1.7-21.7; P=.006] and open surgery [odds ratio=6.0; 95% CI=1.8-19.6; P=.003].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The geriatric-8 score may contribute to predict postoperative urinary tract infection in patients with bladder cancer who underwent radical cystectomy with urinary diversion.</p>","PeriodicalId":23366,"journal":{"name":"Turkish journal of urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9612691/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish journal of urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2022.22069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Urinary tract infection is one of the most common and distressing complications of radical cystectomy with urinary diversion. This study aimed to elucidate the usefulness of the geriatric-8 screening tool for predicting postoperative complications, especially urinary tract infections, in patients who underwent radical cystectomy with urinary diversion.

Material and methods: Ninety-one patients with bladder cancer who underwent radical cystectomy with urinary diversion were assessed for geriatric-8 and classified into 3 groups according to their geriatric-8 score: 14 as the high score group. We retrospectively analyzed the association between geriatric-8 score and postoperative complications classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.

Results: The median age of the patients was 75 years (interquartile range 71-80 years) and 75 (82%) were male; 41 of the patients (45%) had high geriatric-8 score (>14), 40 of the patients (44%) had intermediate geriatric-8 score (11-14), and 10 of the patients (11%) had low geriatric-8 score (< 11). In multivariate analysis, low score of geriatric-8 was independently associated with the occurrence of grade 2 or higher urinary tract infection within 30 days [odds ratio=5.9; 95% CI=1.2-30.3; P=.03], along with female [odds ratio=6.1; 95% CI=1.7-21.7; P=.006] and open surgery [odds ratio=6.0; 95% CI=1.8-19.6; P=.003].

Conclusion: The geriatric-8 score may contribute to predict postoperative urinary tract infection in patients with bladder cancer who underwent radical cystectomy with urinary diversion.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

应用G8预测根治性膀胱切除术患者术后尿路感染的老年评估价值
目的:尿路感染是根治性膀胱切除术伴尿改道最常见和最令人痛苦的并发症之一。本研究旨在阐明老年医学-8筛查工具在预测根治性膀胱切除术伴尿路转移患者术后并发症,特别是尿路感染方面的有效性。材料与方法:对91例膀胱癌行根治性膀胱切除术合并尿分流的患者进行geriatric-8评分,并根据其geriatric-8评分分为3组:14分为高分组。我们根据Clavien-Dindo分类回顾性分析了geriatric8评分与术后并发症的关系。结果:患者年龄中位数为75岁(四分位间距71 ~ 80岁),男性75例(82%);老年病8分高(>14分)41例(45%),中档(11-14分)40例(44%),低档(< 11分)10例(11%)。在多因素分析中,geriatic -8评分低与30天内发生2级及以上尿路感染独立相关[优势比=5.9;95%可信区间= 1.2 - -30.3;P =。03],以及女性[比值比=6.1;95%可信区间= 1.7 - -21.7;P =。[006]和开放手术[优势比=6.0;95%可信区间= 1.8 - -19.6;P = .003]。结论:geriatric8评分可能有助于预测膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术后尿路转移患者的术后尿路感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish journal of urology
Turkish journal of urology Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The aim of the Turkish Journal of Urology is to contribute to the literature by publishing scientifically high-quality research articles as well as reviews, editorials, letters to the editor and case reports. The journal’s target audience includes, urology specialists, medical specialty fellows and other specialists and practitioners who are interested in the field of urology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信