Clinical utility of the Saint Louis University Mental Status Examination (SLUMS) in a mixed neurological sample: Proposed revised cutoff scores for normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia.

IF 1.7 4区 心理学
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-05 DOI:10.1080/23279095.2022.2106572
Zachary C Merz, John W Lace
{"title":"Clinical utility of the Saint Louis University Mental Status Examination (SLUMS) in a mixed neurological sample: Proposed revised cutoff scores for normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia.","authors":"Zachary C Merz, John W Lace","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2022.2106572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early detection of cognitive impairment is of paramount importance in clinical settings, with several brief screening tools having been developed for that purpose. The present study sought to evaluate the clinical utility of the Saint Louis University Mental Status examination (SLUMS) at identifying examinees with normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment, or dementia syndrome using the criterion of a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. Two hundred sixty-three examinees (<i>M</i> age = 67.84 ± 12.72; 59.3% female; 81.4% white) were referred for comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation at a private, Mid-Atlantic medical center. Using original cutoff scores, the SLUMS correctly classified just over half (55.1%) of examinees. Classification statistics suggested modified cutoff scores for mild cognitive impairment (≤24) and dementia (≤17) with strong discriminability between cognitive status groups (AUCs ranged from .834 to .986). These proposed revised cutoff scores improved overall concordance between SLUMS and diagnostic conclusions from comprehensive clinical neuropsychological testing, correctly classifying nearly two-thirds of examinees (65.4%). The SLUMS and its revised cutoff scores appear to have clinical utility for cognitive screening in primary care and neurological settings to inform treatment plans and appropriate referrals for comprehensive neuropsychological assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50741,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2022.2106572","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early detection of cognitive impairment is of paramount importance in clinical settings, with several brief screening tools having been developed for that purpose. The present study sought to evaluate the clinical utility of the Saint Louis University Mental Status examination (SLUMS) at identifying examinees with normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment, or dementia syndrome using the criterion of a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. Two hundred sixty-three examinees (M age = 67.84 ± 12.72; 59.3% female; 81.4% white) were referred for comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation at a private, Mid-Atlantic medical center. Using original cutoff scores, the SLUMS correctly classified just over half (55.1%) of examinees. Classification statistics suggested modified cutoff scores for mild cognitive impairment (≤24) and dementia (≤17) with strong discriminability between cognitive status groups (AUCs ranged from .834 to .986). These proposed revised cutoff scores improved overall concordance between SLUMS and diagnostic conclusions from comprehensive clinical neuropsychological testing, correctly classifying nearly two-thirds of examinees (65.4%). The SLUMS and its revised cutoff scores appear to have clinical utility for cognitive screening in primary care and neurological settings to inform treatment plans and appropriate referrals for comprehensive neuropsychological assessment.

圣路易斯大学精神状态检查(SLUMS)在混合神经系统样本中的临床实用性:建议修订正常认知、轻度认知障碍和痴呆的截断分数。
在临床环境中,早期发现认知障碍至关重要,为此已开发出多种简易筛查工具。本研究旨在评估圣路易斯大学精神状态检查(SLUMS)的临床实用性,以全面的神经心理学评估为标准,识别认知功能正常、轻度认知功能障碍或痴呆综合征的受检者。263 名受检者(中位年龄 = 67.84 ± 12.72;59.3% 为女性;81.4% 为白人)被转诊到一家大西洋中部的私立医疗中心进行综合神经心理学评估。使用最初的截断分数,SLUMS 能正确地对略高于一半(55.1%)的受检者进行分类。分类统计表明,轻度认知障碍(≤24)和痴呆(≤17)的修正临界值在认知状态组之间具有很强的区分度(AUC 在 0.834 到 0.986 之间)。这些修订后的临界值提高了SLUMS与综合临床神经心理学测试诊断结论之间的整体一致性,正确划分了近三分之二的受试者(65.4%)。SLUMS及其修订后的临界值似乎在初级保健和神经病学环境下的认知筛查中具有临床实用性,可为治疗计划和综合神经心理学评估的适当转诊提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
自引率
11.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信