State Eviction Moratoriums During The COVID-19 Pandemic Were Associated With Improved Mental Health Among People Who Rent.

Abdinasir K Ali, George L Wehby
{"title":"State Eviction Moratoriums During The COVID-19 Pandemic Were Associated With Improved Mental Health Among People Who Rent.","authors":"Abdinasir K Ali,&nbsp;George L Wehby","doi":"10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many US states implemented eviction moratoriums in 2020. Evidence from eviction filings from that year shows short-term declines in eviction filings. This study examined the short-term effects of these state eviction moratoriums in 2020 on the mental health status of renters. It employed nationally representative data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and a triple-difference design that compared renters with homeowners while leveraging state differences in moratoriums over time. During 2020 forty-three states and Washington, D.C., implemented eviction moratoriums of varying scope and enforcement. Some moratoriums targeted the whole eviction process, including early stages, whereas others focused on the later stages of eviction. We found that state moratoriums were associated with an improvement in mental health, including fewer days not in good mental health in the past thirty days and a lower likelihood of frequent mental distress (fourteen or more days not in good mental health in the past thirty days). Overall, there is some evidence from this study pointing to potential short-term benefits from state eviction moratoriums in 2020 to the mental health and well-being of renters, which would be important to consider when formulating policies that affect residential stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":300542,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs (Project Hope)","volume":" ","pages":"1583-1589"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs (Project Hope)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many US states implemented eviction moratoriums in 2020. Evidence from eviction filings from that year shows short-term declines in eviction filings. This study examined the short-term effects of these state eviction moratoriums in 2020 on the mental health status of renters. It employed nationally representative data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and a triple-difference design that compared renters with homeowners while leveraging state differences in moratoriums over time. During 2020 forty-three states and Washington, D.C., implemented eviction moratoriums of varying scope and enforcement. Some moratoriums targeted the whole eviction process, including early stages, whereas others focused on the later stages of eviction. We found that state moratoriums were associated with an improvement in mental health, including fewer days not in good mental health in the past thirty days and a lower likelihood of frequent mental distress (fourteen or more days not in good mental health in the past thirty days). Overall, there is some evidence from this study pointing to potential short-term benefits from state eviction moratoriums in 2020 to the mental health and well-being of renters, which would be important to consider when formulating policies that affect residential stability.

在COVID-19大流行期间,国家暂停驱逐与租房者的心理健康状况改善有关。
为应对COVID-19大流行,美国许多州在2020年实施了暂停驱逐。当年驱逐申请的证据显示,驱逐申请的数量在短期内有所下降。这项研究调查了2020年这些州暂停驱逐对租房者心理健康状况的短期影响。它采用了来自行为风险因素监测系统(Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System)的具有全国代表性的数据,并采用了三差设计,将租房者与房主进行比较,同时利用各州在暂停贷款方面的差异。2020年,43个州和华盛顿特区实施了不同范围和执行力度的驱逐禁令。一些暂停针对整个驱逐过程,包括早期阶段,而另一些则侧重于驱逐的后期阶段。我们发现,国家暂停与心理健康的改善有关,包括在过去30天内心理健康状况不佳的天数减少,频繁出现精神困扰的可能性降低(在过去30天内心理健康状况不佳的14天或更长时间)。总的来说,这项研究的一些证据表明,2020年国家暂停驱逐对租房者的心理健康和福祉有潜在的短期好处,这在制定影响住宅稳定的政策时是很重要的考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信