Antidepressant effects of a psychedelic experience in a large prospective naturalistic sample.

Victoria Amalie Nygart, Lis Marie Pommerencke, Eline Haijen, Hannes Kettner, Mendel Kaelen, Erik Lykke Mortensen, David John Nutt, Robin Lester Carhart-Harris, David Erritzoe
{"title":"Antidepressant effects of a psychedelic experience in a large prospective naturalistic sample.","authors":"Victoria Amalie Nygart,&nbsp;Lis Marie Pommerencke,&nbsp;Eline Haijen,&nbsp;Hannes Kettner,&nbsp;Mendel Kaelen,&nbsp;Erik Lykke Mortensen,&nbsp;David John Nutt,&nbsp;Robin Lester Carhart-Harris,&nbsp;David Erritzoe","doi":"10.1177/02698811221101061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over the last two decades, a number of studies have highlighted the potential of psychedelic therapy. However, questions remain to what extend these results translate to naturalistic samples, and how contextual factors and the acute psychedelic experience relate to improvements in affective symptoms following psychedelic experiences outside labs/clinics. The present study sought to address this knowledge gap.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Here, we aimed to investigate changes in anxiety and depression scores before versus after psychedelic experiences in naturalistic contexts, and how various pharmacological, extrapharmacological and experience factors related to outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Individuals who planned to undergo a psychedelic experience were enrolled in this online survey study. Depressive symptoms were assessed at baseline and 2 and 4 weeks post-psychedelic experience, with self-rated Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR-16) as the primary outcome. To facilitate clinical translation, only participants with depressive symptoms at baseline were included. Sample sizes for the four time points were <i>N</i> = 302, <i>N</i> = 182, <i>N</i> = 155 and <i>N</i> = 109, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Relative to baseline, reductions in depressive symptoms were observed at 2 and 4 weeks. A medicinal motive, previous psychedelic use, drug dose and the type of acute psychedelic experience (i.e. specifically, having an emotional breakthrough) were all significantly associated with changes in self-rated QIDS-SR-16.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results lend support to therapeutic potential of psychedelics and highlight the influence of pharmacological and non-pharmacological factors in determining response. Mindful of a potential sample and attrition bias, further controlled and observational longitudinal studies are needed to test the replicability of these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":156490,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":"932-942"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/79/51/10.1177_02698811221101061.PMC9353970.pdf","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811221101061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Background: Over the last two decades, a number of studies have highlighted the potential of psychedelic therapy. However, questions remain to what extend these results translate to naturalistic samples, and how contextual factors and the acute psychedelic experience relate to improvements in affective symptoms following psychedelic experiences outside labs/clinics. The present study sought to address this knowledge gap.

Aim: Here, we aimed to investigate changes in anxiety and depression scores before versus after psychedelic experiences in naturalistic contexts, and how various pharmacological, extrapharmacological and experience factors related to outcomes.

Method: Individuals who planned to undergo a psychedelic experience were enrolled in this online survey study. Depressive symptoms were assessed at baseline and 2 and 4 weeks post-psychedelic experience, with self-rated Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR-16) as the primary outcome. To facilitate clinical translation, only participants with depressive symptoms at baseline were included. Sample sizes for the four time points were N = 302, N = 182, N = 155 and N = 109, respectively.

Results: Relative to baseline, reductions in depressive symptoms were observed at 2 and 4 weeks. A medicinal motive, previous psychedelic use, drug dose and the type of acute psychedelic experience (i.e. specifically, having an emotional breakthrough) were all significantly associated with changes in self-rated QIDS-SR-16.

Conclusion: These results lend support to therapeutic potential of psychedelics and highlight the influence of pharmacological and non-pharmacological factors in determining response. Mindful of a potential sample and attrition bias, further controlled and observational longitudinal studies are needed to test the replicability of these findings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在一个大的前瞻性自然主义样本中,迷幻体验的抗抑郁作用。
背景:在过去的二十年中,许多研究都强调了迷幻疗法的潜力。然而,这些结果在多大程度上适用于自然样本,以及环境因素和急性迷幻体验如何与实验室/诊所以外迷幻体验后情感症状的改善相关,这些问题仍然存在。本研究试图解决这一知识差距。目的:在此,我们旨在研究自然情境下迷幻体验前后焦虑和抑郁评分的变化,以及各种药理学、药外学和体验因素如何与结果相关。方法:计划进行迷幻体验的个人被登记在这个在线调查研究中。以自评抑郁症状快速量表(QIDS-SR-16)作为主要结果,在基线和迷幻后2周和4周对抑郁症状进行评估。为了便于临床翻译,只纳入基线时有抑郁症状的参与者。四个时间点的样本量分别为N = 302、N = 182、N = 155和N = 109。结果:相对于基线,在第2周和第4周观察到抑郁症状的减轻。药物动机、既往致幻剂使用、药物剂量和急性致幻剂体验类型(即,具体而言,有情感突破)都与自评QIDS-SR-16的变化显著相关。结论:本研究结果支持了致幻剂的治疗潜力,并强调了药物和非药物因素在决定反应中的影响。考虑到潜在的样本和损耗偏差,需要进一步的对照和观察性纵向研究来检验这些发现的可重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信