Two-year effectiveness of erenumab in resistant chronic migraine: a prospective real-world analysis.

Anna P Andreou, Matteo Fuccaro, Bethany Hill, Madeleine Murphy, Valeria Caponnetto, Rachael Kilner, Giorgio Lambru
{"title":"Two-year effectiveness of erenumab in resistant chronic migraine: a prospective real-world analysis.","authors":"Anna P Andreou,&nbsp;Matteo Fuccaro,&nbsp;Bethany Hill,&nbsp;Madeleine Murphy,&nbsp;Valeria Caponnetto,&nbsp;Rachael Kilner,&nbsp;Giorgio Lambru","doi":"10.1186/s10194-022-01507-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Controlled and real-world evidence have demonstrated the efficacy of calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (MABs) in migraine. However, data on the over-one-year sustained effectiveness of CGRP MABs in resistant chronic migraine (CM) is sparse.  METHODS: This is a two-year real-world prospective analysis of an ongoing single centre audit conducted in patients with resistant CM. Patients received monthly erenumab for six months before assessing its effectiveness. Responders were considered those who achieved at least 30% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) by month 6, compared to baseline. Secondary outcomes were also analysed, including changes of the Headache Impact Test version 6 (HIT-6).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred sixty-four patients [135 (82.3%) females; mean age 46 SD 14) years] were included in the audit and 160 patients analysed. Patients had failed a mean of 8.4 preventive treatments at baseline. At month 6, 76 patients (48%) were 30% responders to erenumab, 50 patients (31%) were 50% responders and 25 (15%) were 75% responders. The mean reduction in MMD at month 6 was 7.5 days compared to baseline (P < 0.001). At month 12 and month 18, 61 patients (38%) and 52 patients (33%) remained 30% responders respectively. At month 24, 36 patients (23%) remained 30% responders, 25 patients (16%) and 13 patients (8%) were respectively 50% and 75% responders. Compared to 95% of patients at baseline, at months 6, 12 and 24, 46%, 29% and 16% of responders respectively had severe disability. At least one adverse event at month 6, 12, 18 and 24 was reported by 49%, 19%, 11% and 3% of patients. By month 6, 13% of patients discontinued the treatment because of side effects, often constipation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Long-term sustained effectiveness of erenumab was reported only by a minority of resistant CM patients. Although more research in resistant migraine is needed, Erenumab can provide long-term meaningful reduction in migraine load and migraine-related disability in some patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":501630,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Headache and Pain","volume":" ","pages":"139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635079/pdf/","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Headache and Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-022-01507-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: Controlled and real-world evidence have demonstrated the efficacy of calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (MABs) in migraine. However, data on the over-one-year sustained effectiveness of CGRP MABs in resistant chronic migraine (CM) is sparse.  METHODS: This is a two-year real-world prospective analysis of an ongoing single centre audit conducted in patients with resistant CM. Patients received monthly erenumab for six months before assessing its effectiveness. Responders were considered those who achieved at least 30% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) by month 6, compared to baseline. Secondary outcomes were also analysed, including changes of the Headache Impact Test version 6 (HIT-6).

Results: One hundred sixty-four patients [135 (82.3%) females; mean age 46 SD 14) years] were included in the audit and 160 patients analysed. Patients had failed a mean of 8.4 preventive treatments at baseline. At month 6, 76 patients (48%) were 30% responders to erenumab, 50 patients (31%) were 50% responders and 25 (15%) were 75% responders. The mean reduction in MMD at month 6 was 7.5 days compared to baseline (P < 0.001). At month 12 and month 18, 61 patients (38%) and 52 patients (33%) remained 30% responders respectively. At month 24, 36 patients (23%) remained 30% responders, 25 patients (16%) and 13 patients (8%) were respectively 50% and 75% responders. Compared to 95% of patients at baseline, at months 6, 12 and 24, 46%, 29% and 16% of responders respectively had severe disability. At least one adverse event at month 6, 12, 18 and 24 was reported by 49%, 19%, 11% and 3% of patients. By month 6, 13% of patients discontinued the treatment because of side effects, often constipation.

Conclusions: Long-term sustained effectiveness of erenumab was reported only by a minority of resistant CM patients. Although more research in resistant migraine is needed, Erenumab can provide long-term meaningful reduction in migraine load and migraine-related disability in some patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

erenumab治疗顽固性慢性偏头痛的两年疗效:一项前瞻性现实世界分析。
背景:对照和实际证据已经证明降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)单克隆抗体(mab)治疗偏头痛的疗效。然而,关于CGRP单克隆抗体治疗顽固性慢性偏头痛(CM)一年以上持续有效性的数据很少。方法:这是一项对耐药CM患者进行的单中心审计进行的为期两年的现实世界前瞻性分析。在评估其有效性之前,患者每月接受erenumab治疗6个月。应答者被认为是那些在第6个月前每月偏头痛天数(MMD)比基线减少至少30%的人。次要结果也进行了分析,包括头痛影响测试版本6 (HIT-6)的变化。结果:164例患者中,女性135例(82.3%);平均年龄46(标准差14)岁)纳入审计,并分析了160例患者。患者在基线时平均有8.4次预防治疗失败。在第6个月,76名患者(48%)对erenumab有30%的反应,50名患者(31%)有50%的反应,25名患者(15%)有75%的反应。与基线相比,第6个月时MMD的平均减少时间为7.5天(P)。结论:只有少数耐药CM患者报告了erenumab的长期持续有效性。尽管需要对难治性偏头痛进行更多的研究,但Erenumab可以长期有效地减少偏头痛负荷和偏头痛相关残疾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信