Development of a Multidimensional Pain Questionnaire in Professional Dance (MPQDA): a pilot study.

IF 2.8
Jasmin Haenel, Thomas Schoettker-Koeniger, Eileen M Wanke
{"title":"Development of a Multidimensional Pain Questionnaire in Professional Dance (MPQDA): a pilot study.","authors":"Jasmin Haenel,&nbsp;Thomas Schoettker-Koeniger,&nbsp;Eileen M Wanke","doi":"10.1186/s13102-022-00580-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain is part of the everyday life of professional dancers. It can indicate health risks and impair the ability to work. Suitable screening tools can be used to identify pain and its risk potential. A comprehensive, multidimensional, differentiated assessment tool for pain in professional dance does not currently exist.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An initial questionnaire was developed in German and English and was assessed in a qualitative pretest. In a field study with a cross-sectional design including n = 72 dancers from Germany (n = 36 responses each in the English and German language versions), the questionnaire was optimized by item analysis, its psychometric properties (dimensionality, construct validity, reliability) were examined and the ability of the pain dimensions to classify the subjective ability to work in training was analyzed (ROC analysis).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The developed Multidimensional Pain Questionnaire in Professional Dance (MPQDA) was reduced and optimized in its psychometric properties. Following questions were reduced in their items or answer categories: pain localizations (from 20 to 15 regions), accompanying symptoms (from 6 to 3 items), sensory and affective pain quality (from 20 to 10 items), pain frequency (from 4 to 3 answer categories), and the motives of working with pain (from 14 to 12 items). Regarding the subjective ability to work in training, the variables of the ability to work in rehearsals and in performances, as well as the accompanying symptoms of tension and mobility restrictions, showed a relatively good classification ability (Area under the Curve (AUC) ≥ 0.7 in the 95% confidence interval) and significant, moderate to strong correlations (Somers' D > 0.25, p < 0.05). The classification ability of the other pain dimensions was largely absent or poor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MPQDA differentiates various pain dimensions in professional dancers and is available in a compatible manner in German and English. The clinical relevance needs to be explored further in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":520573,"journal":{"name":"BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"189"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635190/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00580-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pain is part of the everyday life of professional dancers. It can indicate health risks and impair the ability to work. Suitable screening tools can be used to identify pain and its risk potential. A comprehensive, multidimensional, differentiated assessment tool for pain in professional dance does not currently exist.

Methods: An initial questionnaire was developed in German and English and was assessed in a qualitative pretest. In a field study with a cross-sectional design including n = 72 dancers from Germany (n = 36 responses each in the English and German language versions), the questionnaire was optimized by item analysis, its psychometric properties (dimensionality, construct validity, reliability) were examined and the ability of the pain dimensions to classify the subjective ability to work in training was analyzed (ROC analysis).

Results: The developed Multidimensional Pain Questionnaire in Professional Dance (MPQDA) was reduced and optimized in its psychometric properties. Following questions were reduced in their items or answer categories: pain localizations (from 20 to 15 regions), accompanying symptoms (from 6 to 3 items), sensory and affective pain quality (from 20 to 10 items), pain frequency (from 4 to 3 answer categories), and the motives of working with pain (from 14 to 12 items). Regarding the subjective ability to work in training, the variables of the ability to work in rehearsals and in performances, as well as the accompanying symptoms of tension and mobility restrictions, showed a relatively good classification ability (Area under the Curve (AUC) ≥ 0.7 in the 95% confidence interval) and significant, moderate to strong correlations (Somers' D > 0.25, p < 0.05). The classification ability of the other pain dimensions was largely absent or poor.

Conclusion: The MPQDA differentiates various pain dimensions in professional dancers and is available in a compatible manner in German and English. The clinical relevance needs to be explored further in the future.

Abstract Image

专业舞蹈多维疼痛问卷(MPQDA)的开发:一项试点研究。
背景:痛苦是职业舞者日常生活的一部分。它可以表明健康风险和损害工作能力。合适的筛查工具可用于识别疼痛及其潜在风险。目前还没有一个全面的、多维的、差异化的专业舞蹈疼痛评估工具。方法:用德语和英语制作了一份初步问卷,并进行了定性前测。在横断面设计的现场研究中,有72名来自德国的舞者(英语和德语版本各有36份回答),通过项目分析对问卷进行优化,对其心理测量特性(维度、结构效度、信度)进行检验,并分析疼痛维度对主观训练工作能力的分类能力(ROC分析)。结果:编制的职业舞蹈多维疼痛问卷(MPQDA)在心理测量学性质上进行了精简和优化。以下问题的项目或答案类别减少:疼痛定位(从20个到15个区域)、伴随症状(从6个到3个项目)、感觉和情感疼痛质量(从20个到10个项目)、疼痛频率(从4个到3个答案类别)和与疼痛一起工作的动机(从14个到12个项目)。在训练中的主观工作能力方面,排练和表演中的工作能力变量以及伴随的紧张和活动受限症状表现出较好的分类能力(曲线下面积(Area under the Curve, AUC)在95%置信区间内≥0.7)和显著的、中等到强的相关性(Somers’D > 0.25, p)。MPQDA区分了专业舞者的各种疼痛维度,并以兼容的方式在德语和英语中提供。其临床意义有待进一步探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书