Accelerating the integration of China into the global development of innovative anticancer drugs.

Huiyao Huang, Dawei Wu, Huilei Miao, Yu Tang, Chengcheng Liu, Hong Fang, Xinyu Meng, Shuhang Wang, Qi Zhu, Xin Wang, Jingting Du, Zhimin Yang, Ning Li, Binghe Xu, Jie He
{"title":"Accelerating the integration of China into the global development of innovative anticancer drugs.","authors":"Huiyao Huang,&nbsp;Dawei Wu,&nbsp;Huilei Miao,&nbsp;Yu Tang,&nbsp;Chengcheng Liu,&nbsp;Hong Fang,&nbsp;Xinyu Meng,&nbsp;Shuhang Wang,&nbsp;Qi Zhu,&nbsp;Xin Wang,&nbsp;Jingting Du,&nbsp;Zhimin Yang,&nbsp;Ning Li,&nbsp;Binghe Xu,&nbsp;Jie He","doi":"10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00483-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this Policy Review was to compare China's overall and synchronous participation in clinical trials for innovative anticancer drugs with that of the USA, the EU, Japan, and South Korea, and to assess changes in the participation rate trends in these five regions. Relevant data from the top 20 international pharmaceutical companies from 2011 to 2021 were systematically collected from the Trialtrove and Pharmaprojects databases. Among the 8260 trials for 954 new anticancer drugs identified, China was involved in 8·8% of the trials and with 20·4% of the drugs being trialled. These participation rates are significantly lower than those for South Korea (14·5% of trials and 36·3% of drugs), Japan (16·1% of trials and 38·7% of drugs), the EU (40·6% of trials and 67·7% of drugs), and the USA (65·7% of trials and 91·2% of drugs; p&lt;0·0001 for all). Similar results were found for the synchronous participation rate, defined as the proportion of drugs or trials at the highest development stage internationally, for the 803 tested drugs, which ranged from 9·0% in China to 87·7% in the USA. China's participation rate in early phase trials (4·4%) and in synchronous trials (5·4%) was even lower, in stark contrast to that of the USA (66·1% for early phase trials and 89·1% for synchronous trials). The fastest growing annual rate of participation in trials was observed in China (15·7%), followed by South Korea (8·2%) and Japan (6·8%); no change was detected in the USA or the EU. This Policy Review shows that Chinese participation in the clinical development of innovative cancer drugs by international pharmaceutical companies has increased over the past decade, but an obvious gap persists in comparison with the USA, the EU, Japan, and South Korea, especially in its synchronous participation and early participation rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":519533,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet. Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"e515-e520"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet. Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00483-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The aim of this Policy Review was to compare China's overall and synchronous participation in clinical trials for innovative anticancer drugs with that of the USA, the EU, Japan, and South Korea, and to assess changes in the participation rate trends in these five regions. Relevant data from the top 20 international pharmaceutical companies from 2011 to 2021 were systematically collected from the Trialtrove and Pharmaprojects databases. Among the 8260 trials for 954 new anticancer drugs identified, China was involved in 8·8% of the trials and with 20·4% of the drugs being trialled. These participation rates are significantly lower than those for South Korea (14·5% of trials and 36·3% of drugs), Japan (16·1% of trials and 38·7% of drugs), the EU (40·6% of trials and 67·7% of drugs), and the USA (65·7% of trials and 91·2% of drugs; p<0·0001 for all). Similar results were found for the synchronous participation rate, defined as the proportion of drugs or trials at the highest development stage internationally, for the 803 tested drugs, which ranged from 9·0% in China to 87·7% in the USA. China's participation rate in early phase trials (4·4%) and in synchronous trials (5·4%) was even lower, in stark contrast to that of the USA (66·1% for early phase trials and 89·1% for synchronous trials). The fastest growing annual rate of participation in trials was observed in China (15·7%), followed by South Korea (8·2%) and Japan (6·8%); no change was detected in the USA or the EU. This Policy Review shows that Chinese participation in the clinical development of innovative cancer drugs by international pharmaceutical companies has increased over the past decade, but an obvious gap persists in comparison with the USA, the EU, Japan, and South Korea, especially in its synchronous participation and early participation rates.

加快中国创新抗癌药物融入全球发展。
本政策综述的目的是比较中国与美国、欧盟、日本和韩国的创新抗癌药物临床试验的整体和同步参与情况,并评估这五个地区的参与率趋势变化。从Trialtrove和Pharmaprojects数据库中系统收集了2011 - 2021年排名前20位的国际制药公司的相关数据。在已确定的954种新型抗癌药物的8260项试验中,中国参与了8.8%的试验,占正在试验药物的20.4%。这些参与率明显低于韩国(14.5%的试验和36.3%的药物)、日本(16.1%的试验和38.7%的药物)、欧盟(40.6%的试验和67.7%的药物)和美国(65.7%的试验和91.2%的药物);P< 0.0001(所有)。803种试验药物的同步参与率(定义为国际上处于最高发展阶段的药物或试验的比例)也出现了类似的结果,从中国的9.0%到美国的87.7%不等。中国的早期试验参与率(4.4%)和同步试验参与率(5.4%)甚至更低,与美国的早期试验参与率(66.1%)和同步试验参与率(89.1%)形成鲜明对比。参与试验的年增长率最快的是中国(15.7%),其次是韩国(8.2%)和日本(6.8%);在美国和欧盟没有发现任何变化。本政策综述显示,近十年来,中国参与国际制药公司抗癌创新药物临床开发的数量有所增加,但与美国、欧盟、日本、韩国相比仍存在明显差距,特别是在同步参与率和早期参与率方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信