Rethinking Fetal Personhood in Conceptualizing Roe.

Rosemarie Garland-Thomson, Joel Michael Reynolds
{"title":"Rethinking Fetal Personhood in Conceptualizing Roe.","authors":"Rosemarie Garland-Thomson, Joel Michael Reynolds","doi":"10.1080/15265161.2022.2089485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"lawsuits, licensure loss, and even prosecution, and many will leave states where those threats are too great. All pregnancy-capable individuals benefit from the tremendous advances in fetal and pregnancy care that have resulted from the past decades of research, and anyone who learns that their wanted pregnancy is affected by a treatable condition benefits from the increasing availability of surgical and other prenatal interventions. But since any medical intervention entails some risk, however small, and many currently available in utero interventions are still classed as innovative care or research, these leading-edge interventions are likely to become less accessible or inaccessible in states with blanket abortion bans— leaving parents with difficult or even insurmountable barriers to healthy outcomes for a deeply desired pregnancy. In a post-Roe world, state and local abortion bans will harm pregnant people and their future children, along with everyone else, by deterring research and innovative care in many of the places that need them most.","PeriodicalId":145777,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of bioethics : AJOB","volume":" ","pages":"64-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of bioethics : AJOB","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2022.2089485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

lawsuits, licensure loss, and even prosecution, and many will leave states where those threats are too great. All pregnancy-capable individuals benefit from the tremendous advances in fetal and pregnancy care that have resulted from the past decades of research, and anyone who learns that their wanted pregnancy is affected by a treatable condition benefits from the increasing availability of surgical and other prenatal interventions. But since any medical intervention entails some risk, however small, and many currently available in utero interventions are still classed as innovative care or research, these leading-edge interventions are likely to become less accessible or inaccessible in states with blanket abortion bans— leaving parents with difficult or even insurmountable barriers to healthy outcomes for a deeply desired pregnancy. In a post-Roe world, state and local abortion bans will harm pregnant people and their future children, along with everyone else, by deterring research and innovative care in many of the places that need them most.
胎儿人格概念的再思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信