Postoperative Analgesia after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy - Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind, Control Trial.

IF 0.8
Caius Breazu, Simona Margarit, Adrian Bartos, Daniela Ionescu
{"title":"Postoperative Analgesia after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy - Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind, Control Trial.","authors":"Caius Breazu,&nbsp;Simona Margarit,&nbsp;Adrian Bartos,&nbsp;Daniela Ionescu","doi":"10.21614/chirurgia.2769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this prospective, randomized, double blind control trial we aim to investigate which of the most used analgesic techniques after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the most efficient. <b>Methods:</b> This study included 81 patients that were randomly distributed into 3 groups using a computer-generated random number which was enclosed in a sealed envelope: group A (control) received classic multimodal iv opioid analgesia, group B received Tap block in oblique subcostal approach (OSTAP) and group C received local anesthetic infiltration of the trocar insertion sites (LAI). The primary outcome of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy of each analgetic technique by measuring VAS pain scores. Secondary outcome included intraoperative opioid requirement and the opioid consumption in the first 24h postoperatively. Intraoperative parameters and outcome data were recorded by an anesthesiologist who was blinded to the study groups. <b>Results:</b> We analyzed a total of 75 patients. For the primary outcome variable, VAS pain scores at rest were significantly reduced in OSTAP group at each time point assessed in the first 24 hours after surgery compared with LAI group and IV opioid analgesia group (p 0.001). Intraoperative fentanyl consumption and 24h pethidine consumption were also significantly reduced in TAP block group compared with LAI group and IV opioid analgesia group (p 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> Our study showed that OSTAP block is a more efficient analgesia technique compared with IV opioid analgesia and with local anesthetic infiltration of trocar sites after laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02707250).</p>","PeriodicalId":520588,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia (Bucharest, Romania : 1990)","volume":" ","pages":"563-571"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgia (Bucharest, Romania : 1990)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.2769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this prospective, randomized, double blind control trial we aim to investigate which of the most used analgesic techniques after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the most efficient. Methods: This study included 81 patients that were randomly distributed into 3 groups using a computer-generated random number which was enclosed in a sealed envelope: group A (control) received classic multimodal iv opioid analgesia, group B received Tap block in oblique subcostal approach (OSTAP) and group C received local anesthetic infiltration of the trocar insertion sites (LAI). The primary outcome of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy of each analgetic technique by measuring VAS pain scores. Secondary outcome included intraoperative opioid requirement and the opioid consumption in the first 24h postoperatively. Intraoperative parameters and outcome data were recorded by an anesthesiologist who was blinded to the study groups. Results: We analyzed a total of 75 patients. For the primary outcome variable, VAS pain scores at rest were significantly reduced in OSTAP group at each time point assessed in the first 24 hours after surgery compared with LAI group and IV opioid analgesia group (p 0.001). Intraoperative fentanyl consumption and 24h pethidine consumption were also significantly reduced in TAP block group compared with LAI group and IV opioid analgesia group (p 0.001). Conclusions: Our study showed that OSTAP block is a more efficient analgesia technique compared with IV opioid analgesia and with local anesthetic infiltration of trocar sites after laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02707250).

腹腔镜胆囊切除术后镇痛——前瞻性、随机、双盲、对照试验。
在这项前瞻性、随机、双盲对照试验中,我们旨在探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术后最常用的镇痛技术中哪一种最有效。方法:将81例患者随机分为3组:a组(对照组)采用经典的多模态静脉阿片镇痛,B组采用斜肋下入路Tap阻滞(OSTAP), C组采用套管针插入部位局麻浸润(LAI)。该试验的主要结果是通过测量VAS疼痛评分来评估每种镇痛技术的疗效。次要结果包括术中阿片类药物需求和术后前24小时阿片类药物消耗。术中参数和结果数据由麻醉医师记录,麻醉医师对研究组不知情。结果:我们共分析了75例患者。对于主要结局变量,与LAI组和静脉阿片类镇痛组相比,OSTAP组在术后最初24小时评估的每个时间点休息时VAS疼痛评分均显著降低(p 0.001)。与LAI组和静脉阿片类镇痛组相比,TAP阻断组术中芬太尼用量和24h哌啶用量也显著减少(p < 0.001)。结论:我们的研究表明,与静脉阿片类镇痛和环针部位局麻浸润相比,OSTAP阻滞是腹腔镜胆囊切除术后更有效的镇痛技术。该试验注册于www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02707250)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信