Gist Representations and Decision-Making Processes Affecting Antibiotic Prescribing for Children with Acute Otitis Media.

IF 1.7
MDM policy & practice Pub Date : 2022-07-26 eCollection Date: 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1177/23814683221115416
Deniz Marti, Rana F Hamdy, David A Broniatowski
{"title":"Gist Representations and Decision-Making Processes Affecting Antibiotic Prescribing for Children with Acute Otitis Media.","authors":"Deniz Marti,&nbsp;Rana F Hamdy,&nbsp;David A Broniatowski","doi":"10.1177/23814683221115416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective.</b> To test the predictions of fuzzy-trace theory regarding pediatric clinicians' decision-making processes and risk perceptions about antibiotics for children with acute otitis media (AOM). <b>Methods.</b> We conducted an online survey experiment administered to a sample of 260 pediatric clinicians. We measured their risk perceptions and prescribing decisions across 3 hypothetical AOM treatment scenarios. Participants were asked to choose among the following options: prescribe antibiotics immediately, watchful waiting (\"hedging\"), or not prescribing antibiotics. <b>Results.</b> We identified 4 gists based on prior literature: 1) \"why not take a risk?\" 2) \"antibiotics might not help but can hurt,\" 3) \"antibiotics do not have harmful side effects,\" and 4) \"antibiotics might have harmful side effects.\" All 4 gists predicted risky choice (<i>P</i> < 0.001), and gist endorsements varied significantly between scenarios when antibiotics were indicated, <i>F</i>(2, 255) = 8.53, <i>P</i> < 0.001; <i>F</i>(2, 255) = 5.14, <i>P</i> < .01; and <i>F</i>(2, 255) = 3.56, <i>P</i> < 0.05 for the first 3 factors, respectively. In a logistic regression, more experienced clinicians were less likely to hedge (<i>B</i> = -0.05; <i>P</i> < 0.01). <b>Conclusion.</b> As predicted by fuzzy-trace theory, pediatric clinicians' prescription decisions are associated with gist representations, which are distinct from verbatim risk estimates. <b>Implications.</b> Antibiotic stewardship programs can benefit by communicating the appropriate gists to clinicians who prescribe antibiotics for pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>We found clinicians' antibiotic prescription decisions were driven by gist representations of antibiotic risks for a given hypothetical patient scenario, and clinicians' gist representations and verbatim risk estimates about antibiotic-related risks were distinct from each other.We showed that the effect of patient scenarios on clinicians' antibiotic prescription decisions was mediated by clinicians' gist representations.Less experienced clinicians tend to \"hedge\" in their antibiotic prescription decisions compared with more experienced clinicians.The broader impact of our study is that antibiotic stewardship programs can benefit by communicating the appropriate gists to clinicians who prescribe antibiotics for pediatric patients, rather than solely focusing on closing potential knowledge deficits of the clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":520707,"journal":{"name":"MDM policy & practice","volume":" ","pages":"23814683221115416"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cc/13/10.1177_23814683221115416.PMC9335473.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MDM policy & practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683221115416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective. To test the predictions of fuzzy-trace theory regarding pediatric clinicians' decision-making processes and risk perceptions about antibiotics for children with acute otitis media (AOM). Methods. We conducted an online survey experiment administered to a sample of 260 pediatric clinicians. We measured their risk perceptions and prescribing decisions across 3 hypothetical AOM treatment scenarios. Participants were asked to choose among the following options: prescribe antibiotics immediately, watchful waiting ("hedging"), or not prescribing antibiotics. Results. We identified 4 gists based on prior literature: 1) "why not take a risk?" 2) "antibiotics might not help but can hurt," 3) "antibiotics do not have harmful side effects," and 4) "antibiotics might have harmful side effects." All 4 gists predicted risky choice (P < 0.001), and gist endorsements varied significantly between scenarios when antibiotics were indicated, F(2, 255) = 8.53, P < 0.001; F(2, 255) = 5.14, P < .01; and F(2, 255) = 3.56, P < 0.05 for the first 3 factors, respectively. In a logistic regression, more experienced clinicians were less likely to hedge (B = -0.05; P < 0.01). Conclusion. As predicted by fuzzy-trace theory, pediatric clinicians' prescription decisions are associated with gist representations, which are distinct from verbatim risk estimates. Implications. Antibiotic stewardship programs can benefit by communicating the appropriate gists to clinicians who prescribe antibiotics for pediatric patients.

Highlights: We found clinicians' antibiotic prescription decisions were driven by gist representations of antibiotic risks for a given hypothetical patient scenario, and clinicians' gist representations and verbatim risk estimates about antibiotic-related risks were distinct from each other.We showed that the effect of patient scenarios on clinicians' antibiotic prescription decisions was mediated by clinicians' gist representations.Less experienced clinicians tend to "hedge" in their antibiotic prescription decisions compared with more experienced clinicians.The broader impact of our study is that antibiotic stewardship programs can benefit by communicating the appropriate gists to clinicians who prescribe antibiotics for pediatric patients, rather than solely focusing on closing potential knowledge deficits of the clinicians.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

影响急性中耳炎儿童抗生素处方的Gist表征和决策过程。
目标。检验模糊追踪理论对儿科临床医生对急性中耳炎(AOM)儿童抗生素的决策过程和风险认知的预测。方法。我们对260名儿科临床医生进行了在线调查实验。我们测量了他们在三种假设的AOM治疗方案中的风险感知和处方决定。参与者被要求在以下选项中做出选择:立即开抗生素,观察等待(“对冲”),或者不开抗生素。结果。我们根据先前的文献确定了4个要点:1)“为什么不冒一下险呢?”2) “抗生素可能没有帮助,反而会造成伤害。”“抗生素没有有害的副作用,”4)“抗生素可能有有害的副作用。”4位gist均预测了风险选择(P < 0.001),且不同情况下的gist支持度差异显著,F(2,255) = 8.53, P < 0.001;F(2,255) = 5.14, p < 0.01;F(2,255) = 3.56,前3个因素P均< 0.05。在逻辑回归中,更有经验的临床医生不太可能对冲(B = -0.05;P < 0.01)。结论。正如模糊痕迹理论所预测的那样,儿科临床医生的处方决策与主旨表征有关,这与逐字风险估计不同。的影响。抗生素管理项目可以通过将适当的专家与为儿科患者开抗生素的临床医生沟通而受益。重点:我们发现临床医生的抗生素处方决策是由抗生素风险的要点表征驱动的,对于给定的假设患者情况,临床医生对抗生素相关风险的要点表征和逐字风险估计彼此不同。我们发现,病人的情况对临床医生的抗生素处方决策的影响是由临床医生的主旨表征介导的。与经验丰富的临床医生相比,经验不足的临床医生倾向于“对冲”抗生素处方决策。我们研究的更广泛的影响是,抗生素管理项目可以通过与为儿科患者开抗生素的临床医生沟通适当的专家而不是仅仅关注于关闭临床医生潜在的知识缺陷而受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信