[When personal protective equipment for health workers during COVID-19 outbreaks is missing: conclusions of the Catalan COVID-19 Workgroup].

Q4 Medicine
Julia Seco Orriols, Marina Rovira-Puig, Berta Roviró-Aliguer, Acran Salmen-Navarro, Gustavo Adolfo Rosal-López, Rosa M Orriols
{"title":"[When personal protective equipment for health workers during COVID-19 outbreaks is missing: conclusions of the Catalan COVID-19 Workgroup].","authors":"Julia Seco Orriols,&nbsp;Marina Rovira-Puig,&nbsp;Berta Roviró-Aliguer,&nbsp;Acran Salmen-Navarro,&nbsp;Gustavo Adolfo Rosal-López,&nbsp;Rosa M Orriols","doi":"10.12961/aprl.2022.25.04.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Frontline healthcare workers (HCWs) are at high risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The aim of this study is to ensure risk-based protection when there is a lack of personal protective equipment (PPE).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>At the beginning of the pandemic, it was suggested that PPE were necessary to protect HCWs from COVID-19. However, given supply shortage, PPE had to be replaced in some situations. Three levels of protection were established depending on the risk level of exposure to SARS-CoV-2. Best practices were reviewed and analysed, and subsequently implemented in all hospitals in Catalonia. As the first COVID-19 wave progressed, we became more knowledgeable with the behaviour of the virus, so PPE procedure tables and algorithms were modified and adapted to the changing scenarios. After airborne transmission was demonstrated as the main route of the virus transmission, we emphasized new measures to ensure respiratory tract protection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three general tables were established based on low, medium, and high risk of infection for HCWs. These three scenarios are a subgroup of the very high-risk category, according to OSHA's pyramid of SARS-CoV-2 risk characterization. The most appropriate PPE for each task or job were identified and alternatives were given amid the shortage of PPE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Specific PPE are required for the healthcare sector. Many studies on PPE are based on the characteristics of industrial jobs, and do not consider the specificities of the healthcare sector, which requires close and prolonged contact with patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":38326,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales","volume":" ","pages":"379-395"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12961/aprl.2022.25.04.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: Frontline healthcare workers (HCWs) are at high risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The aim of this study is to ensure risk-based protection when there is a lack of personal protective equipment (PPE).

Materials and methods: At the beginning of the pandemic, it was suggested that PPE were necessary to protect HCWs from COVID-19. However, given supply shortage, PPE had to be replaced in some situations. Three levels of protection were established depending on the risk level of exposure to SARS-CoV-2. Best practices were reviewed and analysed, and subsequently implemented in all hospitals in Catalonia. As the first COVID-19 wave progressed, we became more knowledgeable with the behaviour of the virus, so PPE procedure tables and algorithms were modified and adapted to the changing scenarios. After airborne transmission was demonstrated as the main route of the virus transmission, we emphasized new measures to ensure respiratory tract protection.

Results: Three general tables were established based on low, medium, and high risk of infection for HCWs. These three scenarios are a subgroup of the very high-risk category, according to OSHA's pyramid of SARS-CoV-2 risk characterization. The most appropriate PPE for each task or job were identified and alternatives were given amid the shortage of PPE.

Conclusions: Specific PPE are required for the healthcare sector. Many studies on PPE are based on the characteristics of industrial jobs, and do not consider the specificities of the healthcare sector, which requires close and prolonged contact with patients.

[缺少COVID-19疫情期间卫生工作者的个人防护装备:加泰罗尼亚COVID-19工作组的结论]。
目的:一线医护人员是SARS-CoV-2感染的高危人群。本研究的目的是在缺乏个人防护装备(PPE)的情况下确保基于风险的保护。材料与方法:大流行初期,建议卫生工作者佩戴个人防护用品,以保护他们免受COVID-19的侵害。然而,由于供应短缺,在某些情况下必须更换个人防护装备。根据暴露于SARS-CoV-2的风险水平,确定了三个级别的保护。对最佳做法进行了审查和分析,随后在加泰罗尼亚的所有医院实施。随着第一波COVID-19疫情的发展,我们对病毒的行为有了更多的了解,因此对PPE程序表和算法进行了修改,以适应不断变化的情况。在证实空气传播是病毒传播的主要途径后,我们强调采取新的措施确保呼吸道的保护。结果:建立了卫生保健工作者低、中、高危感染危险度通用表。根据OSHA的SARS-CoV-2风险特征金字塔,这三种情况属于高风险类别。为每个任务或工作确定最合适的个人防护装备,并在个人防护装备短缺的情况下给出替代方案。结论:卫生保健部门需要特定的个人防护装备。许多关于个人防护装备的研究都是基于工业工作的特点,而没有考虑卫生保健部门的特殊性,因为卫生保健部门需要与患者密切和长时间接触。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信