Staff acceptability and patient usability of a self-screening kiosk for atrial fibrillation in general practice waiting rooms

IF 2.6 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Kirsty McKenzie BA(Hons), BSocSci Psychology(Hons), PhD , Nicole Lowres BPhty, PhD , Jessica Orchard BEc/LLB(Hons), MPH, PhD , Charlotte Hespe MBBS , Ben Freedman MBBS, PhD , Katrina Giskes BHlthSc(Nutr.&Diet.), MBBS, PhD
{"title":"Staff acceptability and patient usability of a self-screening kiosk for atrial fibrillation in general practice waiting rooms","authors":"Kirsty McKenzie BA(Hons), BSocSci Psychology(Hons), PhD ,&nbsp;Nicole Lowres BPhty, PhD ,&nbsp;Jessica Orchard BEc/LLB(Hons), MPH, PhD ,&nbsp;Charlotte Hespe MBBS ,&nbsp;Ben Freedman MBBS, PhD ,&nbsp;Katrina Giskes BHlthSc(Nutr.&Diet.), MBBS, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.cvdhj.2022.07.073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Current Australian and European guidelines recommend opportunistic screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) among patients ≥65 years, but general practitioners (GPs) report time constraints as a major barrier to achieving this. Patient self-screening stations in GP waiting rooms may increase screening rates and case detection of AF, but the acceptability of patient self-screening from the practice staff perspective, and the usability by patients, is unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine staff perspectives on AF self-screening stations and factors impacting acceptability, usability by patients, and sustainability.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed semi-structured interviews with 20 general practice staff and observations of 22 patients while they were undertaking self-screening. Interviews were coded and data analyzed using an iterative thematic analysis approach.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>GPs indicated high levels of acceptance of self-screening, and reported little impact on their workflow. Reception staff recognized the importance of screening for AF, but reported significant impacts on their workflow because some patients were unable to perform screening without assistance. Patient observations corroborated these findings and suggested some potential ways to improve usability.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>AF self-screening in GP waiting rooms may be a viable method to increase opportunistic screening by GPs, but the impacts on reception workflow need to be mitigated for the method to be upscaled for more widespread screening. Furthermore, more age-appropriate station design may increase patient usability and thereby also reduce impact on reception workflow.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72527,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","volume":"3 5","pages":"Pages 212-219"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9596310/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693622001220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background

Current Australian and European guidelines recommend opportunistic screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) among patients ≥65 years, but general practitioners (GPs) report time constraints as a major barrier to achieving this. Patient self-screening stations in GP waiting rooms may increase screening rates and case detection of AF, but the acceptability of patient self-screening from the practice staff perspective, and the usability by patients, is unknown.

Objective

To determine staff perspectives on AF self-screening stations and factors impacting acceptability, usability by patients, and sustainability.

Methods

We performed semi-structured interviews with 20 general practice staff and observations of 22 patients while they were undertaking self-screening. Interviews were coded and data analyzed using an iterative thematic analysis approach.

Results

GPs indicated high levels of acceptance of self-screening, and reported little impact on their workflow. Reception staff recognized the importance of screening for AF, but reported significant impacts on their workflow because some patients were unable to perform screening without assistance. Patient observations corroborated these findings and suggested some potential ways to improve usability.

Conclusion

AF self-screening in GP waiting rooms may be a viable method to increase opportunistic screening by GPs, but the impacts on reception workflow need to be mitigated for the method to be upscaled for more widespread screening. Furthermore, more age-appropriate station design may increase patient usability and thereby also reduce impact on reception workflow.

Abstract Image

全科医生候诊室房颤自我筛查亭的工作人员接受度和患者可用性
目前澳大利亚和欧洲的指南建议在≥65岁的患者中进行房颤(AF)的机会性筛查,但全科医生(gp)报告时间限制是实现这一目标的主要障碍。全科医生候诊室的患者自我筛查站可能会提高房颤的筛查率和病例检出率,但从执业人员的角度来看,患者自我筛查的可接受性以及患者的可用性尚不清楚。目的确定医务人员对房颤自我筛查站的看法,以及影响患者可接受性、可用性和可持续性的因素。方法对20名全科医生进行半结构化访谈,并对22名进行自我筛查的患者进行观察。对访谈进行编码,并使用迭代主题分析方法对数据进行分析。结果全科医生对自我筛选的接受程度较高,对工作流程的影响较小。接待人员认识到房颤筛查的重要性,但报告说,由于一些患者在没有帮助的情况下无法进行筛查,因此对他们的工作流程产生了重大影响。病人的观察证实了这些发现,并提出了一些提高可用性的潜在方法。结论在全科医生候诊室进行自我筛查可能是增加全科医生机会性筛查的一种可行方法,但需要减轻对接待工作流程的影响,以便扩大筛查范围。此外,更适合年龄的工作站设计可以提高患者的可用性,从而减少对接待工作流程的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular digital health journal
Cardiovascular digital health journal Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
58 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信