Acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility of webinar in strengthening research capacity in COVID-19 era in Nigeria.

IF 0.8 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Abiola Olubusola Komolafe, Omotade Adebimpe Ijarotimi, Olufemi Mayowa Adetutu, Oluseye Ademola Okunola, Temitope Olumuyiwa Ojo, Funmilola Folasade Oyinlola, Oluwatosin Eunice Olorunmoteni, Monday Daniel Olodu, Ojo Melvin Agunbiade, Olayinka Donald Otuyemi
{"title":"Acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility of webinar in strengthening research capacity in COVID-19 era in Nigeria.","authors":"Abiola Olubusola Komolafe,&nbsp;Omotade Adebimpe Ijarotimi,&nbsp;Olufemi Mayowa Adetutu,&nbsp;Oluseye Ademola Okunola,&nbsp;Temitope Olumuyiwa Ojo,&nbsp;Funmilola Folasade Oyinlola,&nbsp;Oluwatosin Eunice Olorunmoteni,&nbsp;Monday Daniel Olodu,&nbsp;Ojo Melvin Agunbiade,&nbsp;Olayinka Donald Otuyemi","doi":"10.4103/npmj.npmj_167_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic have necessitated the increasing use of online virtual training platforms. The objectives of the study were to assess the acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility of virtual space in strengthening the research capacity in Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data were collected through an adapted online questionnaire from participants following a 2-day webinar. Both descriptive and inferential (bivariate and multivariate) analyses were done.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings of the study revealed that 55.2% of participants (n = 424) were males and 66.0% (n = 424) were early career researchers. Two hundred and thirty-six participants (55.7%) (n = 424) reported very good acceptability, 67.9% (n = 424) reported very good appropriateness while 54.7% (n = 424) reported good feasibility of webinar for research capacity strengthening. The rating of knowledge obtained from the webinar as 'excellent' increased the odds of acceptability (odd ratio [OR] = 38.30; P < 0.001), appropriateness (OR = 15.65; P < 0.05), and feasibility (OR = 20.85; P < 0.05). Furthermore, the preference for zoom and other online platforms for learning increased odds of acceptability of the webinar (OR = 2.29; confidence interval [CI]: 0.97-57.39; P < 0.05), appropriateness (OR = 2.55; CI: 1.10-5.91; P < 0.05) and feasibility (OR = 2.34; CI: 0.96-5.74; P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study concluded that webinar was acceptable, appropriate and feasible for strengthening research capacity, although poor internet connectivity and cost of data were the major challenges in Nigeria. However, a learner-centred approach in contents' delivery that ensures optimal learning has the potential of enhancing research capacity strengthening via virtual space.</p>","PeriodicalId":19720,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal","volume":"29 4","pages":"288-295"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/npmj.npmj_167_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic have necessitated the increasing use of online virtual training platforms. The objectives of the study were to assess the acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility of virtual space in strengthening the research capacity in Nigeria.

Materials and methods: Data were collected through an adapted online questionnaire from participants following a 2-day webinar. Both descriptive and inferential (bivariate and multivariate) analyses were done.

Results: The findings of the study revealed that 55.2% of participants (n = 424) were males and 66.0% (n = 424) were early career researchers. Two hundred and thirty-six participants (55.7%) (n = 424) reported very good acceptability, 67.9% (n = 424) reported very good appropriateness while 54.7% (n = 424) reported good feasibility of webinar for research capacity strengthening. The rating of knowledge obtained from the webinar as 'excellent' increased the odds of acceptability (odd ratio [OR] = 38.30; P < 0.001), appropriateness (OR = 15.65; P < 0.05), and feasibility (OR = 20.85; P < 0.05). Furthermore, the preference for zoom and other online platforms for learning increased odds of acceptability of the webinar (OR = 2.29; confidence interval [CI]: 0.97-57.39; P < 0.05), appropriateness (OR = 2.55; CI: 1.10-5.91; P < 0.05) and feasibility (OR = 2.34; CI: 0.96-5.74; P < 0.05).

Conclusion: The study concluded that webinar was acceptable, appropriate and feasible for strengthening research capacity, although poor internet connectivity and cost of data were the major challenges in Nigeria. However, a learner-centred approach in contents' delivery that ensures optimal learning has the potential of enhancing research capacity strengthening via virtual space.

网络研讨会在尼日利亚加强新冠肺炎时代研究能力的可接受性、适当性和可行性。
导言:COVID-19大流行带来的挑战要求越来越多地使用在线虚拟培训平台。这项研究的目的是评估虚拟空间在加强尼日利亚研究能力方面的可接受性、适当性和可行性。资料和方法:在为期两天的网络研讨会后,通过对参与者的在线调查问卷收集数据。进行了描述性和推断性(双变量和多变量)分析。结果:研究结果显示,55.2%的参与者(n = 424)为男性,66.0% (n = 424)为早期职业研究人员。236名参与者(55.7%)(n = 424)报告了非常好的可接受性,67.9% (n = 424)报告了非常好的适当性,54.7% (n = 424)报告了网络研讨会加强研究能力的良好可行性。从网络研讨会中获得的知识被评为“优秀”增加了可接受的几率(奇比[OR] = 38.30;P < 0.001),适当性(OR = 15.65;P < 0.05),可行性(OR = 20.85;P < 0.05)。此外,对zoom和其他在线学习平台的偏好增加了网络研讨会的可接受性(OR = 2.29;置信区间[CI]: 0.97-57.39;P < 0.05)、适宜性(OR = 2.55;置信区间:1.10—-5.91;P < 0.05)和可行性(OR = 2.34;置信区间:0.96—-5.74;P < 0.05)。结论:该研究得出结论,网络研讨会对于加强研究能力是可以接受的、适当的和可行的,尽管糟糕的互联网连接和数据成本是尼日利亚面临的主要挑战。然而,以学习者为中心的内容交付方法确保最佳学习,具有通过虚拟空间增强研究能力的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal
Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信