{"title":"Attitudes of Yoga Practitioners Toward COVID-19 Virus Vaccination: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Germany.","authors":"Arndt Büssing, Yvonne Beerenbrock","doi":"10.17761/2022-D-22-00020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To avoid severe courses of COVID-19 infections and reduce death rates, vaccination against the SARS-CoV-1 virus was considered an essential strategy in fighting the pandemic. However, some yoga practitioners reject such vaccinations and assume that their yoga practices protect them. We therefore aimed to analyze how many yoga practitioners were vaccinated, their reasons for being vaccinated, and the influence of the ethical principles of yoga (yamas/niyamas) on these decisions. In a cross-sectional survey in summer 2021, we enrolled 1,545 yoga practitioners (86% women; mean age 51.1 ± 10.9 y). The majority of participants were already vaccinated (66%), and their percentage corresponded to that of the general population. Those who were not willing to get vaccinated scored significantly higher on the yama/niyama factors Contentment/Self-Reflection/Devotion and Surrender and Non-Possessiveness. Depending on the centrality of the yamas/niyamas in their lives, yoga participants differed on their vaccination decisions, but they did not relevantly differ on their pro-social reasons (protection of groups at risk, protection of family) when they were already vaccinated. This assumed protection against severe courses of the COVID-19 infection was higher in the nonvaccinated compared to the vaccinated individuals (Cohen's d = 0.99). This conviction was related to the niyama factor Contentment/Self-Reflection/Devotion and Surrender. Thus, in the yoga schools and other places of yoga practice the relevance of vaccination to also protect others should be discussed, and the consequences of following the yamas and niyamas for the sake of others should be clarified.</p>","PeriodicalId":38682,"journal":{"name":"International journal of yoga therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of yoga therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17761/2022-D-22-00020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
To avoid severe courses of COVID-19 infections and reduce death rates, vaccination against the SARS-CoV-1 virus was considered an essential strategy in fighting the pandemic. However, some yoga practitioners reject such vaccinations and assume that their yoga practices protect them. We therefore aimed to analyze how many yoga practitioners were vaccinated, their reasons for being vaccinated, and the influence of the ethical principles of yoga (yamas/niyamas) on these decisions. In a cross-sectional survey in summer 2021, we enrolled 1,545 yoga practitioners (86% women; mean age 51.1 ± 10.9 y). The majority of participants were already vaccinated (66%), and their percentage corresponded to that of the general population. Those who were not willing to get vaccinated scored significantly higher on the yama/niyama factors Contentment/Self-Reflection/Devotion and Surrender and Non-Possessiveness. Depending on the centrality of the yamas/niyamas in their lives, yoga participants differed on their vaccination decisions, but they did not relevantly differ on their pro-social reasons (protection of groups at risk, protection of family) when they were already vaccinated. This assumed protection against severe courses of the COVID-19 infection was higher in the nonvaccinated compared to the vaccinated individuals (Cohen's d = 0.99). This conviction was related to the niyama factor Contentment/Self-Reflection/Devotion and Surrender. Thus, in the yoga schools and other places of yoga practice the relevance of vaccination to also protect others should be discussed, and the consequences of following the yamas and niyamas for the sake of others should be clarified.
为了避免COVID-19感染的严重过程并降低死亡率,针对SARS-CoV-1病毒的疫苗接种被认为是抗击大流行的基本策略。然而,一些瑜伽练习者拒绝接种这种疫苗,并认为他们的瑜伽练习可以保护他们。因此,我们的目的是分析有多少瑜伽练习者接种了疫苗,他们接种疫苗的原因,以及瑜伽伦理原则(yamas/niyamas)对这些决定的影响。在2021年夏季的一项横断面调查中,我们招募了1545名瑜伽练习者(86%为女性;平均年龄51.1±10.9岁)。大多数参与者已经接种了疫苗(66%),他们的比例与一般人群相对应。那些不愿意接种疫苗的人在满足/自我反省/奉献、投降和无占有欲的yama/niyama因素上得分明显更高。根据他们生活中“心”/“心”的中心地位,瑜伽参与者在接种疫苗的决定上存在差异,但当他们已经接种疫苗时,他们在亲社会原因(保护处于危险中的群体,保护家庭)方面没有相关差异。与接种疫苗的个体相比,未接种疫苗的个体对COVID-19严重感染过程的保护作用更高(Cohen’s d = 0.99)。这种信念与满足/自我反省/奉献和投降有关。因此,在瑜伽学校和其他瑜伽练习场所,应讨论接种疫苗以保护他人的相关性,并应澄清为了他人而遵循“戒”和“戒”的后果。