A Novel Orderset Driven Emergency Department Atrial Fibrillation Algorithm to Increase Discharge and Risk-appropriate Anticoagulation.

Q3 Medicine
Critical Pathways in Cardiology Pub Date : 2022-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-17 DOI:10.1097/HPC.0000000000000293
Steven K Roumpf, Jeffrey A Kline, Gopi Dandamudi, Jason T Schaffer, Tara Flack, Wesley Gallaher, Allison M Weaver, Ina Hunt, Erynn Thinnes, Christian C Strachan, Cassandra Hall, Carl Pafford, Benton R Hunter
{"title":"A Novel Orderset Driven Emergency Department Atrial Fibrillation Algorithm to Increase Discharge and Risk-appropriate Anticoagulation.","authors":"Steven K Roumpf,&nbsp;Jeffrey A Kline,&nbsp;Gopi Dandamudi,&nbsp;Jason T Schaffer,&nbsp;Tara Flack,&nbsp;Wesley Gallaher,&nbsp;Allison M Weaver,&nbsp;Ina Hunt,&nbsp;Erynn Thinnes,&nbsp;Christian C Strachan,&nbsp;Cassandra Hall,&nbsp;Carl Pafford,&nbsp;Benton R Hunter","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are frequently admitted from the emergency department (ED), and when discharged, are not reliably prescribed indicated anticoagulation. We report the impact of a novel computerized ED AF pathway orderset on discharge rate and risk-appropriate anticoagulation in patients with primary AF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The orderset included options for rate and rhythm control of primary AF, structured risk assessment for thrombotic complications, recommendations for anticoagulation as appropriate, and follow up with an electrophysiologist. All patients discharged from the ED in whom the AF orderset was utilized over an 18-month period comprised the primary study population. The primary outcome was the rate of appropriate anticoagulation or not according to confirmed CHADS-VASC and HASBLED scores. Additionally, the percentage of primary AF patients discharged directly from the ED was compared in the 18-month periods before and after introduction of the orderset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 56 patients, average age 57.8 years and average initial heart rate 126 beats/minute, were included in the primary analysis. All 56 (100%; 95% confidence interval, 94-100) received guideline-concordant anticoagulation. The discharge rates in the pre- and postorderset implementation periods were 29% and 41%, respectively (95% confidence interval for 12% difference, 5-18).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our novel AF pathway orderset was associated with 100% guideline-concordant anticoagulation in patients discharged from the ED. Availability of the orderset was associated with a significant increase in the proportion of ED AF patients discharged.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HPC.0000000000000293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are frequently admitted from the emergency department (ED), and when discharged, are not reliably prescribed indicated anticoagulation. We report the impact of a novel computerized ED AF pathway orderset on discharge rate and risk-appropriate anticoagulation in patients with primary AF.

Methods: The orderset included options for rate and rhythm control of primary AF, structured risk assessment for thrombotic complications, recommendations for anticoagulation as appropriate, and follow up with an electrophysiologist. All patients discharged from the ED in whom the AF orderset was utilized over an 18-month period comprised the primary study population. The primary outcome was the rate of appropriate anticoagulation or not according to confirmed CHADS-VASC and HASBLED scores. Additionally, the percentage of primary AF patients discharged directly from the ED was compared in the 18-month periods before and after introduction of the orderset.

Results: A total of 56 patients, average age 57.8 years and average initial heart rate 126 beats/minute, were included in the primary analysis. All 56 (100%; 95% confidence interval, 94-100) received guideline-concordant anticoagulation. The discharge rates in the pre- and postorderset implementation periods were 29% and 41%, respectively (95% confidence interval for 12% difference, 5-18).

Conclusions: Our novel AF pathway orderset was associated with 100% guideline-concordant anticoagulation in patients discharged from the ED. Availability of the orderset was associated with a significant increase in the proportion of ED AF patients discharged.

一种新的订单集驱动的急诊科房颤算法,以增加出院和风险适当的抗凝。
房颤(AF)患者经常从急诊科(ED)入院,出院时,不可靠地开有抗凝指示。我们报告了一种新的计算机化ED AF通路指令集对原发性房颤患者出院率和风险适宜抗凝治疗的影响。方法:指令集包括原发性房颤的速率和节律控制选项,血栓性并发症的结构化风险评估,适当抗凝治疗的建议,以及电生理学家的随访。所有从急诊科出院并在18个月内使用房颤单的患者构成了主要研究人群。主要结局是根据确认的CHADS-VASC和HASBLED评分进行适当的抗凝或不适当的抗凝率。此外,我们还比较了引入医嘱前后18个月内直接从急诊科出院的原发性房颤患者的百分比。结果:初步分析共纳入56例患者,平均年龄57.8岁,平均初始心率126次/分。全部56例(100%;95%可信区间,94-100)接受了符合指南的抗凝治疗。实施前后的出院率分别为29%和41%(95%置信区间为12%,差异为5-18)。结论:我们的新型房颤通路序集与急诊科出院患者100%符合指南的抗凝治疗相关。序集的可用性与急诊科房颤出院患者比例的显著增加相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Pathways in Cardiology
Critical Pathways in Cardiology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Critical Pathways in Cardiology provides a single source for the diagnostic and therapeutic protocols in use at hospitals worldwide for patients with cardiac disorders. The Journal presents critical pathways for specific diagnoses—complete with evidence-based rationales—and also publishes studies of these protocols" effectiveness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信