Knowledge, professional attitudes, and training among health professionals regarding male contraceptive methods.

IF 2
Jessica Tcherdukian, Roger Mieusset, Antoine Netter, Eric Lechevallier, Florence Bretelle, Jeanne Perrin
{"title":"Knowledge, professional attitudes, and training among health professionals regarding male contraceptive methods.","authors":"Jessica Tcherdukian,&nbsp;Roger Mieusset,&nbsp;Antoine Netter,&nbsp;Eric Lechevallier,&nbsp;Florence Bretelle,&nbsp;Jeanne Perrin","doi":"10.1080/13625187.2022.2093851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Health professionals are at the forefront of information and acceptability regarding contraceptive methods, however only one study evaluated their knowledge of male contraception (MC) including hormonal MC (HMC) and thermal MC (TMC). Our objective was to evaluate the knowledge, professional attitudes, and training of French practitioners regarding the management of couple contraception by male contraception (MC).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We designed a descriptive, cross-sectional, multicentre study in 2,396 French practitioners belonging to national or regional institutions involved in contraception. We solicited practitioners by e-mail to complete an anonymous questionnaire; we analysed their knowledge, professional attitudes, and training regarding the management of couple contraception by MC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall participation rate was 18% (427/2,396). Condoms, withdrawal, and vasectomy were known by 98%, 89%, and 76% of the population, respectively. Hormonal MC and Thermal (TMC) were known by 10% and 24% of the population, respectively. Fifty-five percent of the population never or infrequently offered MC during a couple's contraceptive request consultation. Only 14% of the population had ever participated in training on MC; 96% wanted to be better trained on MC, and 87% expressed a willingness to participate in training on the subject.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Health professionals involved in contraception have unsatisfactory knowledge about MC methods based on spermatogenesis inhibition and are eager to have more information about them. To advance the acceptability and dissemination of MC methods, it seems imperative to enhance research in the field and to provide health professionals with an adapted training programme.</p>","PeriodicalId":520795,"journal":{"name":"The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception","volume":" ","pages":"397-402"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2022.2093851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: Health professionals are at the forefront of information and acceptability regarding contraceptive methods, however only one study evaluated their knowledge of male contraception (MC) including hormonal MC (HMC) and thermal MC (TMC). Our objective was to evaluate the knowledge, professional attitudes, and training of French practitioners regarding the management of couple contraception by male contraception (MC).

Study design: We designed a descriptive, cross-sectional, multicentre study in 2,396 French practitioners belonging to national or regional institutions involved in contraception. We solicited practitioners by e-mail to complete an anonymous questionnaire; we analysed their knowledge, professional attitudes, and training regarding the management of couple contraception by MC.

Results: The overall participation rate was 18% (427/2,396). Condoms, withdrawal, and vasectomy were known by 98%, 89%, and 76% of the population, respectively. Hormonal MC and Thermal (TMC) were known by 10% and 24% of the population, respectively. Fifty-five percent of the population never or infrequently offered MC during a couple's contraceptive request consultation. Only 14% of the population had ever participated in training on MC; 96% wanted to be better trained on MC, and 87% expressed a willingness to participate in training on the subject.

Conclusions: Health professionals involved in contraception have unsatisfactory knowledge about MC methods based on spermatogenesis inhibition and are eager to have more information about them. To advance the acceptability and dissemination of MC methods, it seems imperative to enhance research in the field and to provide health professionals with an adapted training programme.

保健专业人员关于男性避孕方法的知识、专业态度和培训。
目的:卫生专业人员在避孕方法的信息和可接受性方面处于最前沿,然而只有一项研究评估了他们对男性避孕(MC)的知识,包括激素避孕(HMC)和热避孕(TMC)。我们的目的是评估法国从业人员对男性避孕管理的知识、专业态度和培训。研究设计:我们设计了一项描述性、横断面、多中心的研究,研究对象为2396名来自国家或地区避孕机构的法国从业人员。我们通过电子邮件邀请从业者填写一份匿名问卷;结果:总体参与率为18%(427/ 2396)。安全套、戒断和输精管结扎分别被98%、89%和76%的人知晓。有10%和24%的人分别知道激素性前列腺癌和热性前列腺癌(TMC)。55%的人在夫妇避孕请求咨询期间从未或很少提供MC。只有14%的人曾经参加过管理培训;96%的人希望更好地接受管理培训,87%的人表示愿意参加这方面的培训。结论:参与避孕的卫生专业人员对基于精子发生抑制的MC方法的了解程度不理想,并渴望了解更多相关信息。为了促进MC方法的可接受性和传播,似乎必须加强该领域的研究,并向卫生专业人员提供适应的培训方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书