Comparison of Two Types of 1-L Polyethylene Glycol-ascorbic Acid as Colonoscopic Bowel Preparation: A Prospective Randomized Study.

IF 0.6 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Suh Hyun Choi, Won Eui Yoon, Seung Hyuk Kim, Hee Jun Myung, Seo Hyun Kim, Soon Oh So, Se Hun Kim, Hyun Mi Lee, Yeoun Jung Oh, Jeong Seop Moon, Tae Yeong Park, You Sun Kim
{"title":"Comparison of Two Types of 1-L Polyethylene Glycol-ascorbic Acid as Colonoscopic Bowel Preparation: A Prospective Randomized Study.","authors":"Suh Hyun Choi,&nbsp;Won Eui Yoon,&nbsp;Seung Hyuk Kim,&nbsp;Hee Jun Myung,&nbsp;Seo Hyun Kim,&nbsp;Soon Oh So,&nbsp;Se Hun Kim,&nbsp;Hyun Mi Lee,&nbsp;Yeoun Jung Oh,&nbsp;Jeong Seop Moon,&nbsp;Tae Yeong Park,&nbsp;You Sun Kim","doi":"10.4166/kjg.2022.090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Recently, 1-L polyethylene glycol-ascorbic acid (PEG-Asc) has been used to reduce the volume of preparation agents in colonoscopy. This clinical trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of two types of 1-L PEG-Asc (CleanViewAL<sup>®</sup> [Tae Joon Pharmaceutical Company, Seoul, Korea] and Plenvu<sup>®</sup> [Norgine, Harefield, United Kingdom]) in average-aged adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a prospective, randomized, non-inferiority, open-label, phase 4 clinical trial. The primary endpoint was the efficacy evaluated using the Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS), and the secondary endpoint was clinical safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 173 patients were assigned to either the CleanViewAL<sup>®</sup> (n=84) or Plenvu<sup>®</sup> (n=89) group. Overall cleansing successes of 97.6% (82/84) and 98.8% (88/89) were achieved in the CleanViewAL<sup>®</sup> group and in the Plenvu<sup>®</sup> group, respectively, showing that CleanViewAL<sup>®</sup> has similar bowel cleansing efficacy to Plenvu<sup>®</sup> (95% CI, -0.052 to 0.027; p=0.207). The total BBPS score was 8.67±1.00 and 8.70±0.76 in the CleanViewAL<sup>®</sup> group and Plenvu<sup>®</sup> group, respectively (p=0.869). The most common adverse symptom was nausea, and no adverse symptoms requiring hospitalization were reported in either group. There were no cases of critical hypernatremia and liver dysfunction exceeding the common terminology criteria for adverse events grade I. An overall satisfaction score (scale of 1 to 10) showed no difference between the two groups (p=0.289). However, the CleanViewAL<sup>®</sup> group showed a higher taste satisfaction score (scale of 1 to 5) than the Plenvu<sup>®</sup> group (CleanViewAL<sup>®</sup>: 2.90±0.91, Plenvu<sup>®</sup>: 2.60±0.86, p=0.028).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both types of 1-L PEG-Asc, CleanViewAL<sup>®</sup> and Plenvu<sup>®</sup>, are effective and safe bowel cleansing agents in average-aged adults. CleanViewAL<sup>®</sup> was preferred in terms of taste satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":22736,"journal":{"name":"The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi","volume":"80 2","pages":"85-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4166/kjg.2022.090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: Recently, 1-L polyethylene glycol-ascorbic acid (PEG-Asc) has been used to reduce the volume of preparation agents in colonoscopy. This clinical trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of two types of 1-L PEG-Asc (CleanViewAL® [Tae Joon Pharmaceutical Company, Seoul, Korea] and Plenvu® [Norgine, Harefield, United Kingdom]) in average-aged adults.

Methods: This study was a prospective, randomized, non-inferiority, open-label, phase 4 clinical trial. The primary endpoint was the efficacy evaluated using the Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS), and the secondary endpoint was clinical safety.

Results: In total, 173 patients were assigned to either the CleanViewAL® (n=84) or Plenvu® (n=89) group. Overall cleansing successes of 97.6% (82/84) and 98.8% (88/89) were achieved in the CleanViewAL® group and in the Plenvu® group, respectively, showing that CleanViewAL® has similar bowel cleansing efficacy to Plenvu® (95% CI, -0.052 to 0.027; p=0.207). The total BBPS score was 8.67±1.00 and 8.70±0.76 in the CleanViewAL® group and Plenvu® group, respectively (p=0.869). The most common adverse symptom was nausea, and no adverse symptoms requiring hospitalization were reported in either group. There were no cases of critical hypernatremia and liver dysfunction exceeding the common terminology criteria for adverse events grade I. An overall satisfaction score (scale of 1 to 10) showed no difference between the two groups (p=0.289). However, the CleanViewAL® group showed a higher taste satisfaction score (scale of 1 to 5) than the Plenvu® group (CleanViewAL®: 2.90±0.91, Plenvu®: 2.60±0.86, p=0.028).

Conclusions: Both types of 1-L PEG-Asc, CleanViewAL® and Plenvu®, are effective and safe bowel cleansing agents in average-aged adults. CleanViewAL® was preferred in terms of taste satisfaction.

两种类型的1-L聚乙二醇-抗坏血酸作为结肠镜肠道准备的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
背景/目的:最近,1-L聚乙二醇抗坏血酸(PEG-Asc)被用于减少结肠镜检查中制剂的体积。本临床试验旨在比较两种类型的1-L PEG-Asc (CleanViewAL®[Tae Joon Pharmaceutical Company, Seoul, Korea]和Plenvu®[Norgine, Harefield, uk])在平均年龄成人中的疗效和安全性。方法:本研究是一项前瞻性、随机、非劣效性、开放标签的4期临床试验。主要终点是使用波士顿肠准备量表(BBPS)评估的疗效,次要终点是临床安全性。结果:共有173名患者被分配到CleanViewAL®(n=84)或Plenvu®(n=89)组。CleanViewAL®组和Plenvu®组的总体清洁成功率分别为97.6%(82/84)和98.8%(88/89),表明CleanViewAL®与Plenvu®具有相似的肠道清洁功效(95% CI, -0.052 ~ 0.027;p = 0.207)。CleanViewAL®组BBPS总分为8.67±1.00分,Plenvu®组BBPS总分为8.70±0.76分(p=0.869)。最常见的不良症状为恶心,两组均未出现需要住院治疗的不良症状。无严重高钠血症和肝功能障碍病例超过i级不良事件的通用术语标准。总体满意度评分(1至10分)在两组之间无差异(p=0.289)。然而,CleanViewAL®组的味觉满意度得分(1至5分)高于Plenvu®组(CleanViewAL®:2.90±0.91,Plenvu®:2.60±0.86,p=0.028)。结论:两种类型的1-L PEG-Asc, CleanViewAL®和Plenvu®,在平均年龄的成年人中是有效和安全的肠道清洁剂。在口味满意度方面,CleanViewAL®是首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信