[Value of the Diagnostic-Driven Therapy with Voriconazole in Patients with Hematological Disorders Complicated by Invasive Fungal Disease].

Pei-Xun Su, Yong-Hua Li
{"title":"[Value of the Diagnostic-Driven Therapy with Voriconazole in Patients with Hematological Disorders Complicated by Invasive Fungal Disease].","authors":"Pei-Xun Su,&nbsp;Yong-Hua Li","doi":"10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2022.04.048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the value of the diagnostic-driven therapy with voriconazole in patients with hematological disorders complicated by invasive fungal disease (IFD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 111 patients with hematological disorders complicated by IFD, treated with voriconazole in the hematology department of the General Hospital of South Theatre Command from July 2019 to July 2020, were retrospectively analyzed to compare the differences between the empirical therapy and the diagnostic-driven therapy on the treatment time of voriconazole, hospitalization days and antifungal efficacy. SPSS 23.0 was used for statistical analysis of data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the diagnostic-driven therapy group, the empirical therapy group had more IFD high-risk patients, including a higher proportion of agranulocytosis patients (95.2% vs 69.5%, P=0.003). However, there were no significant differences on the treatment time of voriconazole, hospitalization days and antifungal efficacy of voriconazole between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using diagnostic-driven therapy in relatively IFD low-risk patients can obtain similar therapeutic outcomes and prognosis as empirical therapy in high-risk patients. Either of two strategies can be used in clinical practice according to the individual conditions of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":519535,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo shi yan xue ye xue za zhi","volume":" ","pages":"1272-1276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhongguo shi yan xue ye xue za zhi","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2022.04.048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the value of the diagnostic-driven therapy with voriconazole in patients with hematological disorders complicated by invasive fungal disease (IFD).

Methods: A total of 111 patients with hematological disorders complicated by IFD, treated with voriconazole in the hematology department of the General Hospital of South Theatre Command from July 2019 to July 2020, were retrospectively analyzed to compare the differences between the empirical therapy and the diagnostic-driven therapy on the treatment time of voriconazole, hospitalization days and antifungal efficacy. SPSS 23.0 was used for statistical analysis of data.

Results: Compared with the diagnostic-driven therapy group, the empirical therapy group had more IFD high-risk patients, including a higher proportion of agranulocytosis patients (95.2% vs 69.5%, P=0.003). However, there were no significant differences on the treatment time of voriconazole, hospitalization days and antifungal efficacy of voriconazole between the two groups.

Conclusion: Using diagnostic-driven therapy in relatively IFD low-risk patients can obtain similar therapeutic outcomes and prognosis as empirical therapy in high-risk patients. Either of two strategies can be used in clinical practice according to the individual conditions of patients.

[伏立康唑在血液病合并侵袭性真菌病诊断驱动治疗中的价值]。
目的:探讨伏立康唑在血液病合并侵袭性真菌病(IFD)患者诊断驱动治疗中的应用价值。方法:回顾性分析2019年7月至2020年7月在南战区总医院血液科接受伏立康唑治疗的111例血液系统疾病合并IFD患者,比较经验疗法与诊断驱动疗法在伏立康唑治疗时间、住院天数及抗真菌效果等方面的差异。采用SPSS 23.0软件对数据进行统计分析。结果:与诊断驱动治疗组相比,经验治疗组IFD高危患者更多,其中粒细胞缺血症患者比例更高(95.2% vs 69.5%, P=0.003)。两组患者在伏立康唑治疗时间、住院天数及抗真菌效果方面均无显著差异。结论:在相对IFD低危患者中采用诊断驱动治疗可获得与高危患者经验治疗相似的治疗效果和预后。两种策略中的任何一种都可以根据患者的个体情况在临床实践中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信