Visualization of lower extremity lymphedema in the same cohort using 99mTc-human serum albumin and 99mTc-phytate lymphoscintigraphy with SPECT-CT.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Lymphology Pub Date : 2022-01-01
T Koike, Y Yabuki, N Miki, Y Yamamoto, K Kokubo, S Kitayama, J Maegawa
{"title":"Visualization of lower extremity lymphedema in the same cohort using 99mTc-human serum albumin and 99mTc-phytate lymphoscintigraphy with SPECT-CT.","authors":"T Koike,&nbsp;Y Yabuki,&nbsp;N Miki,&nbsp;Y Yamamoto,&nbsp;K Kokubo,&nbsp;S Kitayama,&nbsp;J Maegawa","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lymphoscintigraphy with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT-CT) is useful in diagnosing lymphedema. However, there are multiple timings, techniques, and tracers utilized worldwide without any comparison. We examined and compared the image clarity with two different radiotracers, 99mTc human serum albumin (HSA) and 99mTc phytate (phytate), in the same patients. The study retrospectivity examined 46 limbs of 36 patients who underwent lymphoscintigraphy using HSA and phytate from January 2013 to September 2018. Tracer accumulation in the lymph nodes, linear pattern (LP), and dermal backflow (DBF) were qualitatively analyzed; contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) of DBF and standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) of LP were also quantitatively analyzed. Neither lymph node accumulation nor DBF identification showed significant difference. However, a significant difference was observed between the LP identification of the unaffected (p<0.001) and affected sides (p<0.001). On quantitative evaluation, CNR and SUVR of LP was significantly higher with HSA than with phytate (p<0.001). SUVR of LP was also significantly higher with HSA than with phytate in both unaffected (p=0.002) and affected (p=0.005) sides. Overall, images acquired with HSA were clearer than that with phytate, and the identification of LP was particularly better with HSA than with phytate. Thus, lymphoscintigraphy using HSA is preferred over phytate for both diagnosis and evaluation of disease severity and surgical site selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":51122,"journal":{"name":"Lymphology","volume":"55 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lymphology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lymphoscintigraphy with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT-CT) is useful in diagnosing lymphedema. However, there are multiple timings, techniques, and tracers utilized worldwide without any comparison. We examined and compared the image clarity with two different radiotracers, 99mTc human serum albumin (HSA) and 99mTc phytate (phytate), in the same patients. The study retrospectivity examined 46 limbs of 36 patients who underwent lymphoscintigraphy using HSA and phytate from January 2013 to September 2018. Tracer accumulation in the lymph nodes, linear pattern (LP), and dermal backflow (DBF) were qualitatively analyzed; contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) of DBF and standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) of LP were also quantitatively analyzed. Neither lymph node accumulation nor DBF identification showed significant difference. However, a significant difference was observed between the LP identification of the unaffected (p<0.001) and affected sides (p<0.001). On quantitative evaluation, CNR and SUVR of LP was significantly higher with HSA than with phytate (p<0.001). SUVR of LP was also significantly higher with HSA than with phytate in both unaffected (p=0.002) and affected (p=0.005) sides. Overall, images acquired with HSA were clearer than that with phytate, and the identification of LP was particularly better with HSA than with phytate. Thus, lymphoscintigraphy using HSA is preferred over phytate for both diagnosis and evaluation of disease severity and surgical site selection.

在同一队列中使用99mtc -人血清白蛋白和99mtc -植酸淋巴显像与SPECT-CT观察下肢淋巴水肿
淋巴显像与单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT-CT)是有用的诊断淋巴水肿。然而,世界范围内使用的计时、技术和示踪剂多种多样,没有任何比较。我们检查并比较了同一患者的两种不同的放射性示踪剂,99mTc人血清白蛋白(HSA)和99mTc植酸盐(植酸盐)的图像清晰度。该研究回顾性检查了2013年1月至2018年9月期间使用HSA和植酸盐进行淋巴显影的36例患者的46个肢体。定性分析示踪剂在淋巴结的积聚、线性模式(LP)和真皮回流(DBF);定量分析了DBF的噪比(CNR)和LP的标准化吸收值比(SUVR)。淋巴结积聚和DBF鉴定均无显著性差异。然而,在未受影响者的LP识别之间观察到显著差异(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lymphology
Lymphology 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal contains original articles, special features (see below), and information regarding the International Society of Lymphology. It seeks original papers dealing with clinical and basic studies of the lymphatic system and its disorders including related fields. Articles are accepted for external review and publication on the condition that they are contributed to Lymphology only and that no substantial part has been or will be published elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信