Restoring Breast Volume in High BMI Patients: A Single-Center Review of Breast Reconstruction Using Hyperinflated Saline Implants.

Eplasty Pub Date : 2022-07-21 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01
Milind D Kachare, Swapnil D Kachare, Bradley J Vivace, Omar Elfanagely, Brooke Barrow, Adam O'Toole, Alyssa M Simpson, Rachel Safeek, Joshua H Choo, Terry M McCurry, Bradon J Wilhelmi
{"title":"Restoring Breast Volume in High BMI Patients: A Single-Center Review of Breast Reconstruction Using Hyperinflated Saline Implants.","authors":"Milind D Kachare,&nbsp;Swapnil D Kachare,&nbsp;Bradley J Vivace,&nbsp;Omar Elfanagely,&nbsp;Brooke Barrow,&nbsp;Adam O'Toole,&nbsp;Alyssa M Simpson,&nbsp;Rachel Safeek,&nbsp;Joshua H Choo,&nbsp;Terry M McCurry,&nbsp;Bradon J Wilhelmi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast reconstruction in the obese patient is often fraught with poor patient satisfaction due to inadequate volume restoration. The off-label hyperinflation of saline implants is a direct yet controversial solution to this problem, with limited studies in the literature. This study sought to determine the safety and efficacy of this technique for breast reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was performed to identify all patients with a body mass index (BMI) greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2 who underwent breast reconstruction between the years 2013 to 2020 with saline implants filled beyond the manufacturer's maximum recommended volume.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 21 patients identified had an average age of 49 years. The mean BMI was 39.5 kg/m2. A total of 42 implants were placed; 34 were 800 mL, 4 were 750 mL, and 4 were 700 mL. The average overfill volume was 302 mL (138%). Mean follow-up was 65.0 months. Of these, 1 (4.8%) patient with a history of chest wall radiotherapy underwent reoperation for unilateral implant exposure 27 days after the index procedure, no patient sustained spontaneous leak or rupture, and 1 patient had unilateral deflation following emergent central line and pacemaker placement 2 years after the implant was placed for an unrelated cardiovascular event.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hyperinflation of saline implants beyond the maximum recommended volume may be considered for volume replacement in obese patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction. This practice is well tolerated, has a complication rate comparable to using implants filled to the recommended volume, and has the potential to restore lost breast volume in the obese patient post mastectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11687,"journal":{"name":"Eplasty","volume":" ","pages":"e30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9361388/pdf/eplasty-22-e30.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast reconstruction in the obese patient is often fraught with poor patient satisfaction due to inadequate volume restoration. The off-label hyperinflation of saline implants is a direct yet controversial solution to this problem, with limited studies in the literature. This study sought to determine the safety and efficacy of this technique for breast reconstruction.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed to identify all patients with a body mass index (BMI) greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2 who underwent breast reconstruction between the years 2013 to 2020 with saline implants filled beyond the manufacturer's maximum recommended volume.

Results: The 21 patients identified had an average age of 49 years. The mean BMI was 39.5 kg/m2. A total of 42 implants were placed; 34 were 800 mL, 4 were 750 mL, and 4 were 700 mL. The average overfill volume was 302 mL (138%). Mean follow-up was 65.0 months. Of these, 1 (4.8%) patient with a history of chest wall radiotherapy underwent reoperation for unilateral implant exposure 27 days after the index procedure, no patient sustained spontaneous leak or rupture, and 1 patient had unilateral deflation following emergent central line and pacemaker placement 2 years after the implant was placed for an unrelated cardiovascular event.

Conclusions: Hyperinflation of saline implants beyond the maximum recommended volume may be considered for volume replacement in obese patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction. This practice is well tolerated, has a complication rate comparable to using implants filled to the recommended volume, and has the potential to restore lost breast volume in the obese patient post mastectomy.

在高BMI患者中恢复乳房体积:使用高充气盐水植入物进行乳房重建的单中心回顾。
背景:由于体积恢复不足,肥胖患者的乳房重建往往充满了患者满意度差。生理盐水植入物的超说明书恶性膨胀是解决这一问题的一种直接但有争议的方法,文献研究有限。本研究旨在确定该技术用于乳房重建的安全性和有效性。方法:对2013年至2020年期间接受乳房重建的所有体重指数(BMI)大于或等于30 kg/m2的患者进行回顾性图表回顾,这些患者的生理盐水植入物填充量超过了制造商的最大推荐体积。结果:21例患者平均年龄49岁。平均BMI为39.5 kg/m2。共放置42颗植入物;800 mL 34例,750 mL 4例,700 mL 4例,平均溢液量为302 mL(138%)。平均随访65.0个月。其中,1例(4.8%)有胸壁放疗史的患者在指数手术后27天因单侧植入物暴露而再次手术,没有患者发生自发性泄漏或破裂,1例患者在植入植入物2年后因无关心血管事件而在紧急中央静脉导管和起搏器放置后发生单侧通缩。结论:对于接受假体乳房重建术的肥胖患者,可考虑使用超过推荐最大容积的生理盐水假体进行容积置换。这种做法具有良好的耐受性,并发症发生率与使用填充到推荐体积的假体相当,并且有可能恢复乳房切除术后肥胖患者失去的乳房体积。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信