How "green" can religions be? Tensions about religious environmentalism.

Jens Koehrsen, Julia Blanc, Fabian Huber
{"title":"How \"green\" can religions be? Tensions about religious environmentalism.","authors":"Jens Koehrsen, Julia Blanc, Fabian Huber","doi":"10.1007/s41682-021-00070-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Scholarship has suggested a \"greening\" of religions, supposing that faith communities increasingly become environmentally friendly and use their potentials to address environmental challenges. This contribution points to the problems of the supposed \"greening\" by indicating the ongoing disagreements in many religious traditions over environmental engagement. The disagreements show that religious environmentalism is an embattled terrain that involves actors with different interests, backgrounds, and understandings of their traditions. The authors illustrate that tensions are an inherent part of religious environmentalism, becoming manifest in different views and theologies, ambivalences, misunderstandings, and sometimes mistrust. They distinguish between four types of tensions: (1) intradenominational tensions, (2) interdenominational tensions, (3) interreligious tensions, and (4) religious-societal tensions. By drawing attention to the tensions of religious environmentalism, this contribution sheds light on the struggles and limitations that religious environmentalists face in their ambitions to address climate change and other environmental challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":75357,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Religion, Gesellschaft und Politik","volume":" ","pages":"43-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9273537/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Religion, Gesellschaft und Politik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41682-021-00070-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scholarship has suggested a "greening" of religions, supposing that faith communities increasingly become environmentally friendly and use their potentials to address environmental challenges. This contribution points to the problems of the supposed "greening" by indicating the ongoing disagreements in many religious traditions over environmental engagement. The disagreements show that religious environmentalism is an embattled terrain that involves actors with different interests, backgrounds, and understandings of their traditions. The authors illustrate that tensions are an inherent part of religious environmentalism, becoming manifest in different views and theologies, ambivalences, misunderstandings, and sometimes mistrust. They distinguish between four types of tensions: (1) intradenominational tensions, (2) interdenominational tensions, (3) interreligious tensions, and (4) religious-societal tensions. By drawing attention to the tensions of religious environmentalism, this contribution sheds light on the struggles and limitations that religious environmentalists face in their ambitions to address climate change and other environmental challenges.

宗教的 "绿色 "程度如何?宗教环保主义的紧张局势。
有学者提出了宗教 "绿化 "的观点,认为宗教团体会越来越环保,并利用自身的潜力应对环境挑战。这篇论文指出了假定的 "绿化 "所存在的问题,指出了许多宗教传统在参与环保方面持续存在的分歧。这些分歧表明,宗教环保主义是一个充满争议的领域,涉及到具有不同利益、背景和对其传统理解的参与者。作者指出,紧张关系是宗教环保主义的固有组成部分,表现为不同的观点和神学、矛盾、误解,有时甚至是不信任。他们区分了四种类型的紧张关系:(1) 教派内部的紧张关系;(2) 教派之间的紧张关系;(3) 宗教之间的紧张关系;(4) 宗教与社会之间的紧张关系。通过关注宗教环保主义的紧张关系,这篇文章揭示了宗教环保主义者在应对气候变化和其他环境挑战的雄心壮志中所面临的斗争和限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书