{"title":"Shift work and cardiovascular strain on working and non-working days.","authors":"L Stieler, B Hunger, R Seibt","doi":"10.1093/occmed/kqac075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shift work is often associated with adverse effects on cardiovascular health of employees. Only a few studies address the strain of shift and day workers on non-working days compared to working days.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to determine how the cardiovascular strain of hotel and catering industry (HCI) employees who work alternating shifts differs from those working normal day shifts-on both a working day (WD) and a non-working day (ND).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample consisted of 60 alternating shift (morning and afternoon, mean age: 31.5 ± 8.5 years) and 88 day workers (mean age: 35.3 ± 9.4 years). A 24-h ambulatory measurement of blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) on WD and ND with the time phases DAY, SLEEP, and 24-h TOTAL was used to analyse cardiovascular strain. BP status was assessed by self-measurement (36% hypertensives).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total strain over 24 h was slightly higher on WD than ND (mean BP: 134/79 versus 127/75 mmHg, P = 0.002-0.020; mean HR: 78 versus 75 bpm, P = 0.055). In trend, shift workers had higher systolic BP than day workers during the individual time phases of DAY, SLEEP, and 24-h TOTAL on WD. Known cardiovascular risk factors emerged as critical determinants of cardiovascular strain: older age, male gender, and hypertensive blood pressure status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results revealed no clear association between the alternating shift system in HCI and increased cardiovascular strain. The 24-h ambulatory measurement is considered ideal for determining cardiovascular strain in everyday life and under working conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":520727,"journal":{"name":"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":"486-491"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqac075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background: Shift work is often associated with adverse effects on cardiovascular health of employees. Only a few studies address the strain of shift and day workers on non-working days compared to working days.
Aims: This study aims to determine how the cardiovascular strain of hotel and catering industry (HCI) employees who work alternating shifts differs from those working normal day shifts-on both a working day (WD) and a non-working day (ND).
Methods: The sample consisted of 60 alternating shift (morning and afternoon, mean age: 31.5 ± 8.5 years) and 88 day workers (mean age: 35.3 ± 9.4 years). A 24-h ambulatory measurement of blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) on WD and ND with the time phases DAY, SLEEP, and 24-h TOTAL was used to analyse cardiovascular strain. BP status was assessed by self-measurement (36% hypertensives).
Results: The total strain over 24 h was slightly higher on WD than ND (mean BP: 134/79 versus 127/75 mmHg, P = 0.002-0.020; mean HR: 78 versus 75 bpm, P = 0.055). In trend, shift workers had higher systolic BP than day workers during the individual time phases of DAY, SLEEP, and 24-h TOTAL on WD. Known cardiovascular risk factors emerged as critical determinants of cardiovascular strain: older age, male gender, and hypertensive blood pressure status.
Conclusions: The results revealed no clear association between the alternating shift system in HCI and increased cardiovascular strain. The 24-h ambulatory measurement is considered ideal for determining cardiovascular strain in everyday life and under working conditions.
背景:倒班工作通常与员工心血管健康的不良影响有关。只有少数研究涉及轮班和日工在非工作日与工作日的压力比较。目的:本研究旨在确定酒店餐饮业(HCI)员工在工作日(WD)和非工作日(ND)上的心血管应变与正常日班员工的差异。方法:样本包括60名早晚交替轮班工人,平均年龄31.5±8.5岁,88名日间工人,平均年龄35.3±9.4岁。采用24小时动态测量WD和ND的血压(BP)和心率(HR),并随时间相DAY、SLEEP和24小时TOTAL分析心血管应变。通过自我测量来评估血压状态(高血压患者占36%)。结果:24 h总菌株在WD上比在ND上稍高(平均BP: 134/79 vs 127/75 mmHg, P = 0.002 ~ 0.020;平均心率:78 vs 75 bpm, P = 0.055)。趋势上,轮班工人在工作日的day、SLEEP和24-h TOTAL的各个时间段的收缩压高于白班工人。已知的心血管危险因素是心血管紧张的关键决定因素:年龄、男性和高血压状况。结论:结果显示HCI的交替移位系统与心血管应变增加之间没有明确的关联。24小时动态测量被认为是在日常生活和工作条件下确定心血管应变的理想方法。