Treatment-Resistant Mood Disorders in LGBTQ People: A Retrospective Study of Clinical Features and Response to Electroconvulsive Therapy.

Fumie Oka, Kamile Weischedel, Amanda Bakian, Brian J Mickey
{"title":"Treatment-Resistant Mood Disorders in LGBTQ People: A Retrospective Study of Clinical Features and Response to Electroconvulsive Therapy.","authors":"Fumie Oka,&nbsp;Kamile Weischedel,&nbsp;Amanda Bakian,&nbsp;Brian J Mickey","doi":"10.4088/JCP.21m14321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> Individuals who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer (LGBTQ) experience greater social exclusion and discrimination and higher rates of depression. Little is known about the clinical characteristics or treatment outcomes of LGBTQ people with severe mood disorders. We hypothesized that LGBTQ patients would present with distinct clinical features and that they might respond less favorably to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).</p><p><p><b><i>Methods:</i></b> We performed a retrospective chart review (2018-2020) of 59 LGBTQ patients and 441 non-LGBTQ patients who received an acute ECT series for treatment-resistant illness (in 95%, a depressive episode by <i>DSM-5</i> criteria). Clinical response was evaluated with the Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) scale, self-rated Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR), and QIDS-SR suicide item. Inverse probability of treatment weights were applied to regression models to balance baseline confounders.</p><p><p><b><i>Results:</i></b> LGBTQ status was associated with younger age, current suicide ideation, past suicide attempt, self-injurious behavior, posttraumatic stress disorder, personality disorder, tobacco smoking, past substance use disorder, and history of sexual abuse (all <i>P</i> < .05). LGBTQ and non-LGBTQ groups showed no significant differences in CGI-I score (odds ratio = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.48-1.40, <i>P</i> = .47), change in QIDS-SR total score (least-squares mean = -9.2 vs -8.1; <i>F</i><sub>1,408</sub> = 1.42; <i>P</i> = .24), or change in QIDS-SR suicide item (odds ratio = 1.83, 95% CI = 0.91-3.68, <i>P</i> = .09).</p><p><p><b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> LGBTQ people with treatment-resistant mood disorders presented with distinct clinical features, some of which have been previously linked with less favorable treatment outcomes. Nonetheless, LGBTQ and non-LGBTQ patients experienced similar clinically significant improvement with an acute ECT series. ECT should be considered for treatment-resistant depression regardless of an individual's sexual orientation or gender identity.</p>","PeriodicalId":516853,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.21m14321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: Individuals who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer (LGBTQ) experience greater social exclusion and discrimination and higher rates of depression. Little is known about the clinical characteristics or treatment outcomes of LGBTQ people with severe mood disorders. We hypothesized that LGBTQ patients would present with distinct clinical features and that they might respond less favorably to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).

Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review (2018-2020) of 59 LGBTQ patients and 441 non-LGBTQ patients who received an acute ECT series for treatment-resistant illness (in 95%, a depressive episode by DSM-5 criteria). Clinical response was evaluated with the Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) scale, self-rated Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR), and QIDS-SR suicide item. Inverse probability of treatment weights were applied to regression models to balance baseline confounders.

Results: LGBTQ status was associated with younger age, current suicide ideation, past suicide attempt, self-injurious behavior, posttraumatic stress disorder, personality disorder, tobacco smoking, past substance use disorder, and history of sexual abuse (all P < .05). LGBTQ and non-LGBTQ groups showed no significant differences in CGI-I score (odds ratio = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.48-1.40, P = .47), change in QIDS-SR total score (least-squares mean = -9.2 vs -8.1; F1,408 = 1.42; P = .24), or change in QIDS-SR suicide item (odds ratio = 1.83, 95% CI = 0.91-3.68, P = .09).

Conclusions: LGBTQ people with treatment-resistant mood disorders presented with distinct clinical features, some of which have been previously linked with less favorable treatment outcomes. Nonetheless, LGBTQ and non-LGBTQ patients experienced similar clinically significant improvement with an acute ECT series. ECT should be considered for treatment-resistant depression regardless of an individual's sexual orientation or gender identity.

LGBTQ人群治疗难治性情绪障碍:临床特征和对电休克治疗反应的回顾性研究
目的:女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人或酷儿(LGBTQ)的个体经历了更大的社会排斥和歧视,患抑郁症的几率也更高。对于患有严重情绪障碍的LGBTQ人群的临床特征或治疗结果知之甚少。我们假设LGBTQ患者会表现出不同的临床特征,他们对电休克治疗(ECT)的反应可能不太好。方法:我们对59名LGBTQ患者和441名非LGBTQ患者进行了回顾性图表回顾(2018-2020),这些患者接受了急性ECT系列治疗难治性疾病(95%为DSM-5标准的抑郁发作)。采用临床总体印象改善量表(CGI-I)、自评抑郁症状快速量表(QIDS-SR)和QIDS-SR自杀项目评估临床反应。将处理权重的逆概率应用于回归模型以平衡基线混杂因素。结果:LGBTQ状态与年龄、当前自杀意念、既往自杀企图、自残行为、创伤后应激障碍、人格障碍、吸烟、既往物质使用障碍、性虐待史相关(均P = 0.47), QIDS-SR总分变化(最小二乘均值= -9.2 vs -8.1;f1,408 = 1.42;P = .24),或QIDS-SR自杀项目的变化(优势比= 1.83,95% CI = 0.91-3.68, P = .09)。结论:患有治疗难治性情绪障碍的LGBTQ患者表现出明显的临床特征,其中一些先前与不太有利的治疗结果有关。尽管如此,LGBTQ和非LGBTQ患者在急性ECT系列中获得了相似的临床显着改善。对于难治性抑郁症,无论患者的性取向或性别认同如何,都应考虑电痉挛疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信