Minimum effective concentration of ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided adductor canal + IPACK block in total knee arthroplasty.

IF 1.6
Qiuru Wang, Jian Hu, Lijun Cai, Aergen Bahete, Jing Yang, Pengde Kang
{"title":"Minimum effective concentration of ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided adductor canal + IPACK block in total knee arthroplasty.","authors":"Qiuru Wang,&nbsp;Jian Hu,&nbsp;Lijun Cai,&nbsp;Aergen Bahete,&nbsp;Jing Yang,&nbsp;Pengde Kang","doi":"10.1177/10225536221122339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the minimum effective concentration (MEC<sub>90,</sub> defined as effective in 90% of patients) of ropivacaine during the combined procedure of adductor canal block (ACB) and infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the posterior knee (IPACK) block for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This double-blind, randomized dose-finding trial was based on a biased coin up-and-down sequential design, where the concentration of ropivacaine administered to a given patient depended on the previous patient's response. Before surgery, the first patient received 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine for ACB and again for IPACK. If the block failed, the next subject received a 0.025% higher ropivacaine concentration; otherwise, the next subject received either a 0.025% smaller dose (probability of 0.11) or the same dose (probability of 0.89). The primary outcome was whether the block was successful. Block success was defined as the patient did not suffer significant pain and did not receive rescue analgesia within 6 h after surgery. MEC<sub>90</sub> was estimated by isotonic regression, and the 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated by bootstrapping. Secondary outcomes were numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores at postoperative 24 h and 48 h, postoperative morphine consumption, and time to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were compared between patients whose blocks succeeded with those which failed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on analysis of 52 patients, the MEC<sub>90</sub> was 0.247% (95% CI 0.227-0.271%), MEC<sub>95</sub> was 0.260% (95% CI 0.244-0.282%) and MEC<sub>99</sub> was 0.272% (95% CI 0.260-0.291%). In contrast, four of nine trials in a recent systematic review reported ropivacaine concentrations below 0.247%. Patients whose blocks succeeded (<i>n</i> = 45) had significantly lower NRS pain scores, lower morphine consumption, and shorter hospitalization than patients whose blocks failed (<i>n</i> = 7).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our small trial suggests that 0.247% ropivacaine in 20 mL respectively can provide successful ACB + IPACK block in 90% of patients. However, given that many published trials have used lower concentrations, our findings should be verified in larger studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":520682,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong)","volume":" ","pages":"10225536221122339"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536221122339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the minimum effective concentration (MEC90, defined as effective in 90% of patients) of ropivacaine during the combined procedure of adductor canal block (ACB) and infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the posterior knee (IPACK) block for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

Methods: This double-blind, randomized dose-finding trial was based on a biased coin up-and-down sequential design, where the concentration of ropivacaine administered to a given patient depended on the previous patient's response. Before surgery, the first patient received 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine for ACB and again for IPACK. If the block failed, the next subject received a 0.025% higher ropivacaine concentration; otherwise, the next subject received either a 0.025% smaller dose (probability of 0.11) or the same dose (probability of 0.89). The primary outcome was whether the block was successful. Block success was defined as the patient did not suffer significant pain and did not receive rescue analgesia within 6 h after surgery. MEC90 was estimated by isotonic regression, and the 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated by bootstrapping. Secondary outcomes were numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores at postoperative 24 h and 48 h, postoperative morphine consumption, and time to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were compared between patients whose blocks succeeded with those which failed.

Results: Based on analysis of 52 patients, the MEC90 was 0.247% (95% CI 0.227-0.271%), MEC95 was 0.260% (95% CI 0.244-0.282%) and MEC99 was 0.272% (95% CI 0.260-0.291%). In contrast, four of nine trials in a recent systematic review reported ropivacaine concentrations below 0.247%. Patients whose blocks succeeded (n = 45) had significantly lower NRS pain scores, lower morphine consumption, and shorter hospitalization than patients whose blocks failed (n = 7).

Conclusions: Our small trial suggests that 0.247% ropivacaine in 20 mL respectively can provide successful ACB + IPACK block in 90% of patients. However, given that many published trials have used lower concentrations, our findings should be verified in larger studies.

超声引导内收管+ IPACK阻滞全膝关节置换术中罗哌卡因的最低有效浓度。
目的:本研究旨在探讨全膝关节置换术患者内收管阻滞(ACB)和腘动脉与后膝关节囊间浸润阻滞(IPACK)联合手术中罗哌卡因的最低有效浓度(MEC90,定义为90%的患者有效)。方法:这项双盲、随机剂量发现试验基于有偏硬币上下顺序设计,其中给予给定患者的罗哌卡因浓度取决于先前患者的反应。术前,第一位患者接受0.2%罗哌卡因20ml用于ACB和IPACK。如果阻断失败,下一名受试者接受0.025%的罗哌卡因浓度提高;否则,下一位受试者接受的剂量要么小0.025%(概率为0.11),要么相同剂量(概率为0.89)。主要的结果是封锁是否成功。阻滞成功的定义是患者在术后6小时内没有出现明显的疼痛,也没有接受抢救性镇痛。MEC90用等渗回归估计,95%置信区间(CI)用bootstrapping计算。次要结果是术后24小时和48小时的数值评定量表(NRS)疼痛评分、术后吗啡用量和出院时间。次要结果比较阻滞成功和失败的患者。结果:52例患者MEC90为0.247% (95% CI 0.227 ~ 0.271%), MEC95为0.260% (95% CI 0.244 ~ 0.282%), MEC99为0.272% (95% CI 0.260 ~ 0.291%)。相比之下,在最近的一项系统评价中,9项试验中有4项报告罗哌卡因浓度低于0.247%。与阻滞失败的患者相比,阻滞成功的患者(n = 45)的NRS疼痛评分显著降低,吗啡消耗更低,住院时间更短(n = 7)。结论:我们的小型试验表明,0.247%罗哌卡因20ml分别可为90%的患者提供成功的ACB + IPACK阻滞。然而,鉴于许多已发表的试验使用了较低的浓度,我们的发现应该在更大规模的研究中得到验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信