Medicinal Cannabis for the Treatment of Chronic Refractory Pain: An Investigation of the Adverse Event Profile and Health-Related Quality of Life Impact of an Oral Formulation.

Q1 Medicine
Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids Pub Date : 2022-02-09 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000521492
Sarah Abelev, Leon N Warne, Melissa Benson, Mark Hardy, Sunny Nayee, John Barlow
{"title":"Medicinal Cannabis for the Treatment of Chronic Refractory Pain: An Investigation of the Adverse Event Profile and Health-Related Quality of Life Impact of an Oral Formulation.","authors":"Sarah Abelev,&nbsp;Leon N Warne,&nbsp;Melissa Benson,&nbsp;Mark Hardy,&nbsp;Sunny Nayee,&nbsp;John Barlow","doi":"10.1159/000521492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Medicinal cannabis is prescribed in Australia for patients with chronic refractory pain conditions. However, measures of safety and effectiveness of different cannabinoids are lacking. We designed an observational study to capture effectiveness, adverse events (AEs), and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures in patients prescribed an oral medicinal cannabis formulation at Cannabis Access Clinics through the Cannabis Access Clinics Observational study (CACOS).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to evaluate effectiveness, reported AEs, and change in patient-reported outcomes in individuals prescribed a cannabinoid oil formulation for management of chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on patients prescribed an oil formulation of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol for pain symptoms of at least 3-month duration. Clinician-reported AEs were organized by system, organ, class, and frequency. Analysis of patient-reported responses to a questionnaire was conducted using published minimal clinically important differences to determine meaningful change in HRQoL over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More than half (<i>n</i> = 91/151, 60.3%) of the participants experienced at least one AE during the observation period (mean 133 ± 116 days). No serious AEs were reported. Patient-reported pain impact scores were significantly reduced across the cohort (<i>p</i> = 0.034), and pain intensity scores verged on significance (<i>p</i> = 0.053). The majority of patients saw meaningful improvements in sleep (49.3%) and fatigue (35.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This analysis presents real-world data collected as part of standard of care. More than one-third of patients benefited from oral medicinal cannabis, which is impactful given the refractory nature of their pain. Amelioration of the impact of pain confirms continued prescribing of this formulation and validates our observational methodology as a tool to determine the therapeutic potency of medicinal cannabinoids.</p>","PeriodicalId":18415,"journal":{"name":"Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids","volume":" ","pages":"20-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9235063/pdf/mca-0005-0020.pdf","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000521492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Introduction: Medicinal cannabis is prescribed in Australia for patients with chronic refractory pain conditions. However, measures of safety and effectiveness of different cannabinoids are lacking. We designed an observational study to capture effectiveness, adverse events (AEs), and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures in patients prescribed an oral medicinal cannabis formulation at Cannabis Access Clinics through the Cannabis Access Clinics Observational study (CACOS).

Objectives: We aimed to evaluate effectiveness, reported AEs, and change in patient-reported outcomes in individuals prescribed a cannabinoid oil formulation for management of chronic pain.

Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on patients prescribed an oil formulation of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol for pain symptoms of at least 3-month duration. Clinician-reported AEs were organized by system, organ, class, and frequency. Analysis of patient-reported responses to a questionnaire was conducted using published minimal clinically important differences to determine meaningful change in HRQoL over time.

Results: More than half (n = 91/151, 60.3%) of the participants experienced at least one AE during the observation period (mean 133 ± 116 days). No serious AEs were reported. Patient-reported pain impact scores were significantly reduced across the cohort (p = 0.034), and pain intensity scores verged on significance (p = 0.053). The majority of patients saw meaningful improvements in sleep (49.3%) and fatigue (35.6%).

Conclusion: This analysis presents real-world data collected as part of standard of care. More than one-third of patients benefited from oral medicinal cannabis, which is impactful given the refractory nature of their pain. Amelioration of the impact of pain confirms continued prescribing of this formulation and validates our observational methodology as a tool to determine the therapeutic potency of medicinal cannabinoids.

Abstract Image

药用大麻治疗慢性难治性疼痛:一种口服制剂的不良事件概况和健康相关生活质量影响的调查。
简介:药用大麻在澳大利亚是为慢性难治性疼痛患者开的处方。然而,缺乏对不同大麻素的安全性和有效性的测量。我们设计了一项观察性研究,通过大麻准入诊所观察性研究(CACOS),捕捉在大麻准入诊所处方口服药用大麻制剂的患者的有效性、不良事件(ae)和与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL)指标。目的:我们旨在评估使用大麻素油制剂治疗慢性疼痛的有效性、报告的ae和患者报告结果的变化。方法:对服用Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol和大麻二酚油制剂治疗疼痛症状持续至少3个月的患者进行横断面分析。临床报告的ae按系统、器官、类别和频率进行组织。利用已公布的最小临床重要差异对患者报告的问卷反应进行分析,以确定HRQoL随时间的有意义变化。结果:超过一半(n = 91/151, 60.3%)的参与者在观察期间(平均133±116天)至少经历了一次AE。没有严重的ae报告。患者报告的疼痛影响评分在整个队列中显著降低(p = 0.034),疼痛强度评分接近显著(p = 0.053)。大多数患者在睡眠(49.3%)和疲劳(35.6%)方面有明显改善。结论:该分析提供了作为标准护理的一部分收集的真实世界数据。超过三分之一的患者受益于口服药用大麻,鉴于其疼痛的难治性,这是有效的。疼痛影响的改善证实了该配方的持续处方,并验证了我们的观察方法作为确定药用大麻素治疗效力的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids
Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信