Comparative evaluation of different techniques for herniorrhaphy in calves.

IF 0.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
A Fatima, M Arif Khan, S Aslam, K Ashraf, A Khalid Mahmood, M Asif, S Shah, N Hussain
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of different techniques for herniorrhaphy in calves.","authors":"A Fatima,&nbsp;M Arif Khan,&nbsp;S Aslam,&nbsp;K Ashraf,&nbsp;A Khalid Mahmood,&nbsp;M Asif,&nbsp;S Shah,&nbsp;N Hussain","doi":"10.24425/pjvs.2022.141804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Umbilical hernia is one of the most common problems in young calves. This problem occurs in dairy sector as well as in the local farmers. Present study was conducted to compare outcomes of four different techniques of herniorrhaphy. Twenty four young calves (n=24) were divided in 4 groups (A, B, C, and D) which underwent four different surgical techniques. Group A underwent vicryl plus suture material and pants-over-west technique, Group B underwent mesh application with Dexon suture material by using simple interrupted suture pattern, Group C underwent closed method with Nylon No. 3 suture material by using vertical mattress suture pattern and Group D underwent clamp application method with Silk No. 2 suture material by using simple interrupted suture pattern. The result showed that mesh application method was comparatively better with respect to feed intake, body weight gain and healing time. There was no reoccurrence with non-significant hematological changes (p≤0.05). It is concluded that mesh application method is safer than other three techniques and there are no systemic effects of this surgical intervention on calves' health.</p>","PeriodicalId":20366,"journal":{"name":"Polish journal of veterinary sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish journal of veterinary sciences","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24425/pjvs.2022.141804","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Umbilical hernia is one of the most common problems in young calves. This problem occurs in dairy sector as well as in the local farmers. Present study was conducted to compare outcomes of four different techniques of herniorrhaphy. Twenty four young calves (n=24) were divided in 4 groups (A, B, C, and D) which underwent four different surgical techniques. Group A underwent vicryl plus suture material and pants-over-west technique, Group B underwent mesh application with Dexon suture material by using simple interrupted suture pattern, Group C underwent closed method with Nylon No. 3 suture material by using vertical mattress suture pattern and Group D underwent clamp application method with Silk No. 2 suture material by using simple interrupted suture pattern. The result showed that mesh application method was comparatively better with respect to feed intake, body weight gain and healing time. There was no reoccurrence with non-significant hematological changes (p≤0.05). It is concluded that mesh application method is safer than other three techniques and there are no systemic effects of this surgical intervention on calves' health.

小腿疝修补术不同技术的比较评价。
脐疝是幼犊最常见的问题之一。这一问题既发生在乳制品行业,也发生在当地农民身上。本研究旨在比较四种不同的疝修补技术的结果。24头小牛(n=24)分为4组(A、B、C、D),采用4种不同的手术方法。A组采用vicryl加缝线材料和裤子过西法,B组采用Dexon缝线材料采用简单间断缝线方式补片,C组采用尼龙3号缝线材料采用垂直床垫缝线方式闭合,D组采用Silk 2号缝线材料采用简单间断缝线方式钳夹应用。结果表明,补片法在采食量、增重和愈合时间方面相对较好。无复发,血液学无明显改变(p≤0.05)。综上所述,补片法比其他三种技术更安全,且该手术干预对犊牛健康无全身性影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Polish journal of veterinary sciences
Polish journal of veterinary sciences 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences accepts short communications, original papers and review articles from the field of, widely understood, veterinary sciences - basic, clinical, environmental, animal-origin food hygiene, feed hygiene, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信