Possible limits of calibrating reading charts with the Landolt ring: a microscopic study.

Wolfgang Radner, Michael Radner, Barbara Daxer, Armin Ettl
{"title":"Possible limits of calibrating reading charts with the Landolt ring: a microscopic study.","authors":"Wolfgang Radner,&nbsp;Michael Radner,&nbsp;Barbara Daxer,&nbsp;Armin Ettl","doi":"10.1186/s40662-022-00302-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate microscopically whether the print quality and accuracy of sizing of Landolt ring near vision charts are adequate for the calibration of reading charts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Near vision charts with Landolt rings from Oculus GmbH (C-Test; Wetzlar, Germany), Precision Vision (Woodstock, IL) and the RADNER Charts were examined, as well as custom-made Landolt rings optimized for print quality. Microscopic investigations and measurements were performed by using a Huvitz HSZ 600 stereomicroscope (Nikon NIS Elements software) to evaluate the height of the Landolt rings, the thickness of the lines, and the width of the openings. The deviations from the mathematically correct values, which were calculated as given in the EN/ISO 8596 and by the International Council of Ophthalmology (ICO), were analyzed (calculated for a test distance of 40 cm).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the near vision charts showed notable deficiencies in print quality and aberrations from the nominal values in the height, thickness of the lines, and width of the openings. The openings were too narrow, whereas the height and thickness of the lines were larger than the nominal values. Even the openings of Landolt rings optimized for print quality were not always within an acceptable 5% tolerance and need further improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study reports inaccuracies in the heights, thicknesses of the lines, and widths of the openings of Landolt rings in all the near vision charts investigated. The extent of these inaccuracies excludes such near vision charts as reference tests for the calibration of reading charts. The x-height in relation to the visual angle still seems to be the most reliable method for standardizing the print sizes for reading charts.</p>","PeriodicalId":520624,"journal":{"name":"Eye and vision (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9377069/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye and vision (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-022-00302-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate microscopically whether the print quality and accuracy of sizing of Landolt ring near vision charts are adequate for the calibration of reading charts.

Methods: Near vision charts with Landolt rings from Oculus GmbH (C-Test; Wetzlar, Germany), Precision Vision (Woodstock, IL) and the RADNER Charts were examined, as well as custom-made Landolt rings optimized for print quality. Microscopic investigations and measurements were performed by using a Huvitz HSZ 600 stereomicroscope (Nikon NIS Elements software) to evaluate the height of the Landolt rings, the thickness of the lines, and the width of the openings. The deviations from the mathematically correct values, which were calculated as given in the EN/ISO 8596 and by the International Council of Ophthalmology (ICO), were analyzed (calculated for a test distance of 40 cm).

Results: All the near vision charts showed notable deficiencies in print quality and aberrations from the nominal values in the height, thickness of the lines, and width of the openings. The openings were too narrow, whereas the height and thickness of the lines were larger than the nominal values. Even the openings of Landolt rings optimized for print quality were not always within an acceptable 5% tolerance and need further improvement.

Conclusion: This study reports inaccuracies in the heights, thicknesses of the lines, and widths of the openings of Landolt rings in all the near vision charts investigated. The extent of these inaccuracies excludes such near vision charts as reference tests for the calibration of reading charts. The x-height in relation to the visual angle still seems to be the most reliable method for standardizing the print sizes for reading charts.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

用兰道夫环校准读数图的可能限制:微观研究。
目的:评价兰道夫环近视图的印刷质量和尺寸精度是否足以用于读数图的校准。方法:Oculus GmbH公司的Landolt环近视图(C-Test);Wetzlar,德国),Precision Vision (Woodstock, IL)和RADNER图表进行了检查,以及为打印质量优化的定制Landolt环。使用Huvitz HSZ 600立体显微镜(Nikon NIS Elements软件)进行显微检查和测量,以评估Landolt环的高度,线的厚度和开口的宽度。根据EN/ISO 8596和国际眼科理事会(ICO)给出的计算结果,分析了与数学正确值的偏差(以40厘米的测试距离计算)。结果:所有近视力图显示打印质量有明显的缺陷,与标称值在线的高度、线的厚度和开口的宽度有明显的像差。开口太窄,而线条的高度和厚度都大于标称值。即使是针对打印质量优化的兰道夫环开口也不总是在可接受的5%公差范围内,需要进一步改进。结论:本研究报告了在所调查的所有近视力图表中,兰多耳环的高度、线的厚度和开口的宽度都不准确。这些不准确的程度不包括作为校准读数图的参考测试的近视图。x高度与视角的关系似乎仍然是标准化阅读图表的打印尺寸的最可靠的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信