Your money or your life? Public support for health initiatives during the COVID-19 pandemic.

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES
Australian Journal of Social Issues Pub Date : 2022-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-30 DOI:10.1002/ajs4.220
Bruce Keith Tranter
{"title":"Your money or your life? Public support for health initiatives during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Bruce Keith Tranter","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While many Australians agree with the need for COVID-19 restrictions and lockdowns, a vocal minority of citizens loudly voice opposition to government restrictions, characterised as impositions on 'free speech' and impacting the Australian economy. National data from the 2020/21 Australian Survey of Social and Attitudes and Tasmanian survey data enable an examination of those who support or oppose health initiatives aimed at minimising the impact of the pandemic. The majority of Australians believed government imposed restrictions were 'about right', although women were more likely than men to be concerned about the health implications of COVID-19. Tasmanian data show that controlling for social background, those who prioritise the economy are less likely than those concerned about the health implications of COVID-19 to wear masks in public, less likely to be tested in case they have to self-isolate, less likely to check in, and less likely to be vaccinated. Alternatively, higher trust in university research, and trust in scientists as a source of information about COVID-19 was positively associated with attitudes and behaviour designed to reduce the transmission of COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9348312/pdf/AJS4-57-544.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.220","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

While many Australians agree with the need for COVID-19 restrictions and lockdowns, a vocal minority of citizens loudly voice opposition to government restrictions, characterised as impositions on 'free speech' and impacting the Australian economy. National data from the 2020/21 Australian Survey of Social and Attitudes and Tasmanian survey data enable an examination of those who support or oppose health initiatives aimed at minimising the impact of the pandemic. The majority of Australians believed government imposed restrictions were 'about right', although women were more likely than men to be concerned about the health implications of COVID-19. Tasmanian data show that controlling for social background, those who prioritise the economy are less likely than those concerned about the health implications of COVID-19 to wear masks in public, less likely to be tested in case they have to self-isolate, less likely to check in, and less likely to be vaccinated. Alternatively, higher trust in university research, and trust in scientists as a source of information about COVID-19 was positively associated with attitudes and behaviour designed to reduce the transmission of COVID-19.

你的钱还是你的命?2019冠状病毒病大流行期间公众对卫生举措的支持。
虽然许多澳大利亚人同意有必要对COVID-19进行限制和封锁,但少数公民大声反对政府的限制,称其为对“言论自由”的强加,并影响澳大利亚的经济。来自2020/21年澳大利亚社会和态度调查的国家数据以及塔斯马尼亚州的调查数据使我们能够审查支持或反对旨在尽量减少这一流行病影响的卫生倡议的人。大多数澳大利亚人认为政府实施的限制是“正确的”,尽管女性比男性更担心新冠病毒对健康的影响。塔斯马尼亚的数据显示,在控制社会背景的情况下,那些优先考虑经济的人比那些担心COVID-19对健康影响的人更不可能在公共场合戴口罩,更不可能在必须自我隔离的情况下接受检测,更不可能登记入住,更不可能接种疫苗。另外,对大学研究的更高信任和对科学家作为COVID-19信息来源的更高信任与旨在减少COVID-19传播的态度和行为呈正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信