Is Tofacitinib Effectiveness in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Better After Conventional Than After Biological Therapy? - A Cohort Study in a Colombian Population.

IF 5.3 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Biologics : Targets & Therapy Pub Date : 2022-07-13 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2147/BTT.S361164
Pedro Santos-Moreno, Susan Martinez, Linda Ibata, Laura Villarreal, Fernando Rodríguez-Florido, Manuel Rivero, Adriana Rojas-Villarraga, Claudio Galarza-Maldonado
{"title":"Is Tofacitinib Effectiveness in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Better After Conventional Than After Biological Therapy? - A Cohort Study in a Colombian Population.","authors":"Pedro Santos-Moreno,&nbsp;Susan Martinez,&nbsp;Linda Ibata,&nbsp;Laura Villarreal,&nbsp;Fernando Rodríguez-Florido,&nbsp;Manuel Rivero,&nbsp;Adriana Rojas-Villarraga,&nbsp;Claudio Galarza-Maldonado","doi":"10.2147/BTT.S361164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Tofacitinib is recommended for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients with moderate to severe disease activity, but there is not enough evidence on its effectiveness after conventional DMARDs vs its use after biologics. The aim was evaluating the effectiveness of tofacitinib in RA as first-line treatment (after conventional DMARDs) in a real-life setting in Colombian (Latin-American) patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study conducted at a specialized center for RA management. A complete statistical analysis was performed to compare the values of the change in the DAS28 at months 3, 6, and 12 in both treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 152 RA patients who received tofacitinib: first-line 85 patients (55.9%) after failure on conventional DMARDs or second-line 67 patients (44.1%) after failure on biologic DMARDs. Comparative analysis of response to treatment showed a reduction in DAS28 at 3, 6, and 12 months in both study groups without statistical differences, but a higher proportion of first-line patients achieved remission (45% vs 23%). Nonresponse at three months were associated with no response at six months of follow-up. Baseline DAS28 was significantly associated with response at 12 months (OR: 1.87, 95%CI: 1.06-3.30, <i>p</i>-value 0.028). In second-line patients, response to tofacitinib was not related to number of biologic DMARDs previously used.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tofacitinib is an effective treatment option for patients with RA, maybe better after conventional DMARDs than after biologic therapy failure. Further studies are required to determine the role of tofacitinib in different lines of RA treatment and in other groups of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9025,"journal":{"name":"Biologics : Targets & Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"107-117"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3f/ad/btt-16-107.PMC9289171.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biologics : Targets & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/BTT.S361164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Tofacitinib is recommended for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients with moderate to severe disease activity, but there is not enough evidence on its effectiveness after conventional DMARDs vs its use after biologics. The aim was evaluating the effectiveness of tofacitinib in RA as first-line treatment (after conventional DMARDs) in a real-life setting in Colombian (Latin-American) patients.

Patients and methods: Retrospective cohort study conducted at a specialized center for RA management. A complete statistical analysis was performed to compare the values of the change in the DAS28 at months 3, 6, and 12 in both treatment groups.

Results: A total of 152 RA patients who received tofacitinib: first-line 85 patients (55.9%) after failure on conventional DMARDs or second-line 67 patients (44.1%) after failure on biologic DMARDs. Comparative analysis of response to treatment showed a reduction in DAS28 at 3, 6, and 12 months in both study groups without statistical differences, but a higher proportion of first-line patients achieved remission (45% vs 23%). Nonresponse at three months were associated with no response at six months of follow-up. Baseline DAS28 was significantly associated with response at 12 months (OR: 1.87, 95%CI: 1.06-3.30, p-value 0.028). In second-line patients, response to tofacitinib was not related to number of biologic DMARDs previously used.

Conclusion: Tofacitinib is an effective treatment option for patients with RA, maybe better after conventional DMARDs than after biologic therapy failure. Further studies are required to determine the role of tofacitinib in different lines of RA treatment and in other groups of patients.

托法替尼对类风湿关节炎患者的疗效常规治疗优于生物治疗?-哥伦比亚人群的队列研究。
目的:托法替尼被推荐用于治疗中度至重度疾病活动度的类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者,但没有足够的证据表明其在常规dmard后与生物制剂后的有效性。目的是在哥伦比亚(拉丁美洲)患者的现实环境中评估托法替尼作为RA一线治疗(在常规DMARDs之后)的有效性。患者和方法:在一个专门的RA管理中心进行的回顾性队列研究。对两组患者在第3、6、12个月DAS28的变化进行完整的统计分析。结果:共有152例RA患者接受托法替尼治疗:一线85例(55.9%)患者在常规dmard治疗失败后,二线67例(44.1%)患者在生物dmard治疗失败后。对治疗反应的比较分析显示,两个研究组在3、6和12个月时DAS28降低,无统计学差异,但一线患者达到缓解的比例更高(45%对23%)。3个月无反应与6个月随访无反应相关。基线DAS28与12个月时的疗效显著相关(OR: 1.87, 95%CI: 1.06-3.30, p值0.028)。在二线患者中,对托法替尼的反应与先前使用的生物dmard的数量无关。结论:托法替尼是治疗RA患者的有效选择,可能在常规dmard后优于生物治疗失败后。需要进一步的研究来确定托法替尼在不同类风湿性关节炎治疗线和其他患者组中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biologics : Targets & Therapy
Biologics : Targets & Therapy MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信