Anesthesia care in the interventional neuroradiology suite: an update.

IF 2.1
Current opinion in anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2022-08-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-05 DOI:10.1097/ACO.0000000000001151
Corina Bello, Chanannait Paisansathan, Thomas Riva, Markus M Luedi, Lukas Andereggen
{"title":"Anesthesia care in the interventional neuroradiology suite: an update.","authors":"Corina Bello,&nbsp;Chanannait Paisansathan,&nbsp;Thomas Riva,&nbsp;Markus M Luedi,&nbsp;Lukas Andereggen","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The scope of procedures conducted by neurointerventionalists is expanding quickly, with lacking consensus over the best anesthesia modality. Although the procedures involve all age groups, the interventions may be complex and lengthy and may be provided in hospitals currently not yet familiar with the field. Here we review current literature addressing elective outpatient neurointerventional procedures and aim to provide an update on the management of intervention-specific crises, address special patient populations, and provide key learning points for everyday use in the neurointerventional radiology suite.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Various studies have compared the use of different anesthesia modalities and preinterventional and postinterventional care. Monitored anesthesia care is generally recommended for elderly patients, whereas children are preferably treated with general anesthesia. Additional local anesthesia is beneficial for procedures, such as percutaneous kyphoplasty and vascular access.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Combining different anesthetic modalities is a valuable approach in the neurointerventional radiology suite. More interventional and patient population-specific studies are needed to improve evidence-based perioperative management.</p>","PeriodicalId":520600,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"457-464"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose of review: The scope of procedures conducted by neurointerventionalists is expanding quickly, with lacking consensus over the best anesthesia modality. Although the procedures involve all age groups, the interventions may be complex and lengthy and may be provided in hospitals currently not yet familiar with the field. Here we review current literature addressing elective outpatient neurointerventional procedures and aim to provide an update on the management of intervention-specific crises, address special patient populations, and provide key learning points for everyday use in the neurointerventional radiology suite.

Recent findings: Various studies have compared the use of different anesthesia modalities and preinterventional and postinterventional care. Monitored anesthesia care is generally recommended for elderly patients, whereas children are preferably treated with general anesthesia. Additional local anesthesia is beneficial for procedures, such as percutaneous kyphoplasty and vascular access.

Summary: Combining different anesthetic modalities is a valuable approach in the neurointerventional radiology suite. More interventional and patient population-specific studies are needed to improve evidence-based perioperative management.

介入神经放射学套件的麻醉护理:最新进展。
综述目的:神经介入医师的手术范围正在迅速扩大,但对最佳麻醉方式缺乏共识。虽然这些程序涉及所有年龄组,但干预措施可能复杂而漫长,可能由目前尚不熟悉该领域的医院提供。在这里,我们回顾了目前关于选择性门诊神经介入手术的文献,旨在提供干预特异性危机管理的最新信息,解决特殊患者群体,并为神经介入放射学套件的日常使用提供关键学习点。最近的发现:各种研究比较了不同麻醉方式的使用以及介入前和介入后的护理。监测麻醉护理一般推荐用于老年患者,而儿童最好是全麻治疗。额外的局部麻醉有利于手术,如经皮后凸成形术和血管通路。总结:在神经介入放射学套件中,结合不同的麻醉方式是一种有价值的方法。需要更多的介入性和患者群体特异性研究来改善循证围手术期管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信