Comparison of Propofol-Fentanyl with Midazolam-Ketamine Combination in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Kidney Biopsy.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Iranian journal of kidney diseases Pub Date : 2022-07-01
Anoush Azarfar, Yalda Ravanshad, Mohaddeseh Golsorkhi, Elnaz Zahiri, Mohamad Gharavi Fard, Mohsen Akhondi, Alireza Ghodsi, Sahar Ravanshad
{"title":"Comparison of Propofol-Fentanyl with Midazolam-Ketamine Combination in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Kidney Biopsy.","authors":"Anoush Azarfar,&nbsp;Yalda Ravanshad,&nbsp;Mohaddeseh Golsorkhi,&nbsp;Elnaz Zahiri,&nbsp;Mohamad Gharavi Fard,&nbsp;Mohsen Akhondi,&nbsp;Alireza Ghodsi,&nbsp;Sahar Ravanshad","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Kidney biopsy is a procedure of choice for the diagnosis of many kidney diseases. In children it is performed with the use of sedatives. The aim of this study was to compare the combination of propofol/fentanyl with midazolam/ketamine for sedation in pediatric patients undergoing kidney biopsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this double-blinded clinical trial, seventeen children, candidate of kidney biopsy were included and randomized into two groups. One group received Midazolam/Ketamine with doses of 30 to 50 μg/kg and 0.25 to 1 mg/kg, and the other group were sedated with propofol/fentanyl combination in doses of 0.5 to 1 mg/kg and 0.5 to 1 mg/kg, respectively. Administration time, medication doses, total procedure time, need for analgesic use after the procedure, and patient relaxation, with no agitation during and after the biopsy were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine patients received midazolam/ketamine and eight received propofol/fentanyl. None of them experienced vomiting or itching after sedation. There were no meaningful differences in qualitative variables of the need for pain relief between two groups. Regarding the distribution of pain at the time of sedation, and 1, 3, 6, and 24 hours after sedation, there was no significant statistical difference between the two groups. There was also no significant statistical difference between the two groups, regarding patients' relaxation during, and 1, 3, 6, and 24 hours after biopsy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference between the degree of sedation and the analgesic effect of the two regimens in the two groups.  DOI: 10.52547/ijkd.6982.</p>","PeriodicalId":14610,"journal":{"name":"Iranian journal of kidney diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian journal of kidney diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Kidney biopsy is a procedure of choice for the diagnosis of many kidney diseases. In children it is performed with the use of sedatives. The aim of this study was to compare the combination of propofol/fentanyl with midazolam/ketamine for sedation in pediatric patients undergoing kidney biopsy.

Methods: In this double-blinded clinical trial, seventeen children, candidate of kidney biopsy were included and randomized into two groups. One group received Midazolam/Ketamine with doses of 30 to 50 μg/kg and 0.25 to 1 mg/kg, and the other group were sedated with propofol/fentanyl combination in doses of 0.5 to 1 mg/kg and 0.5 to 1 mg/kg, respectively. Administration time, medication doses, total procedure time, need for analgesic use after the procedure, and patient relaxation, with no agitation during and after the biopsy were recorded.

Results: Nine patients received midazolam/ketamine and eight received propofol/fentanyl. None of them experienced vomiting or itching after sedation. There were no meaningful differences in qualitative variables of the need for pain relief between two groups. Regarding the distribution of pain at the time of sedation, and 1, 3, 6, and 24 hours after sedation, there was no significant statistical difference between the two groups. There was also no significant statistical difference between the two groups, regarding patients' relaxation during, and 1, 3, 6, and 24 hours after biopsy.

Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference between the degree of sedation and the analgesic effect of the two regimens in the two groups.  DOI: 10.52547/ijkd.6982.

异丙酚-芬太尼与咪达唑仑-氯胺酮联合应用于小儿肾活检的比较。
肾活检是诊断许多肾脏疾病的首选方法。在儿童中使用镇静剂。本研究的目的是比较异丙酚/芬太尼与咪达唑仑/氯胺酮联合应用于儿科肾活检患者的镇静效果。方法:采用双盲临床试验,选取17例肾活检候选患儿,随机分为两组。一组给予咪达唑仑/氯胺酮,剂量分别为30 ~ 50 μg/kg和0.25 ~ 1 mg/kg,另一组给予异丙酚/芬太尼联合镇静,剂量分别为0.5 ~ 1 mg/kg和0.5 ~ 1 mg/kg。记录给药时间、给药剂量、总手术时间、术后使用镇痛药的需要以及患者的放松情况,活检期间和活检后无躁动。结果:咪达唑仑/氯胺酮9例,异丙酚/芬太尼8例。镇静后没有人出现呕吐或瘙痒。两组间疼痛缓解需求的定性变量无显著差异。镇静时及镇静后1、3、6、24 h疼痛分布,两组比较差异无统计学意义。两组患者在活检后1、3、6、24小时的松弛情况也无统计学差异。结论:两组患者两种方案的镇静程度及镇痛效果比较,差异均无统计学意义。DOI: 10.52547 / ijkd.6982。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Iranian journal of kidney diseases
Iranian journal of kidney diseases UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Iranian Journal of Kidney Diseases (IJKD), a peer-reviewed journal in English, is the official publication of the Iranian Society of Nephrology. The aim of the IJKD is the worldwide reflection of the knowledge produced by the scientists and clinicians in nephrology. Published quarterly, the IJKD provides a new platform for advancement of the field. The journal’s objective is to serve as a focal point for debates and exchange of knowledge and experience among researchers in a global context. Original papers, case reports, and invited reviews on all aspects of the kidney diseases, hypertension, dialysis, and transplantation will be covered by the IJKD. Research on the basic science, clinical practice, and socio-economics of renal health are all welcomed by the editors of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信