Cotrimoxazole guidelines for infants who are HIV-exposed but uninfected: a call for a public health and ethics approach to the evidence.

Brodie Daniels, Louise Kuhn, Elizabeth Spooner, Helen Mulol, Ameena Goga, Ute Feucht, Sabiha Y Essack, Anna Coutsoudis
{"title":"Cotrimoxazole guidelines for infants who are HIV-exposed but uninfected: a call for a public health and ethics approach to the evidence.","authors":"Brodie Daniels,&nbsp;Louise Kuhn,&nbsp;Elizabeth Spooner,&nbsp;Helen Mulol,&nbsp;Ameena Goga,&nbsp;Ute Feucht,&nbsp;Sabiha Y Essack,&nbsp;Anna Coutsoudis","doi":"10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00120-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>WHO first recommended cotrimoxazole prophylaxis for all infants who are HIV-exposed but uninfected (HEU) in 2000, given the ability of this treatment to prevent mortality from pneumocystis pneumonia in adults living with HIV. Over the last 21 years, evidence has been generated from the use of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis in infants who are HEU, including two randomised controlled trials, which have shown no clinical benefit and an increase in antibiotic resistance and microbiome dysbiosis. Additionally, improvements in health care over the last two decades in terms of antiretroviral treatment and prophylaxis for mothers and infants, and notably improved vaccination programmes, have substantially reduced the risk of HIV transmission and the overall morbidity and mortality of infants who are HEU from pneumonia and diarrhoeal diseases. Here, we highlight these changes in health care alongside the unchanged cotrimoxazole prophylaxis guidelines and call for a change in these guidelines on the basis of a public health and ethics approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":153380,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet. Global health","volume":" ","pages":"e1198-e1203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet. Global health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00120-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

WHO first recommended cotrimoxazole prophylaxis for all infants who are HIV-exposed but uninfected (HEU) in 2000, given the ability of this treatment to prevent mortality from pneumocystis pneumonia in adults living with HIV. Over the last 21 years, evidence has been generated from the use of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis in infants who are HEU, including two randomised controlled trials, which have shown no clinical benefit and an increase in antibiotic resistance and microbiome dysbiosis. Additionally, improvements in health care over the last two decades in terms of antiretroviral treatment and prophylaxis for mothers and infants, and notably improved vaccination programmes, have substantially reduced the risk of HIV transmission and the overall morbidity and mortality of infants who are HEU from pneumonia and diarrhoeal diseases. Here, we highlight these changes in health care alongside the unchanged cotrimoxazole prophylaxis guidelines and call for a change in these guidelines on the basis of a public health and ethics approach.

暴露于艾滋病毒但未感染的婴儿复方新诺明指南:呼吁对证据采取公共卫生和伦理方法。
世卫组织于2000年首次建议对所有暴露于艾滋病毒但未感染(HEU)的婴儿使用复方新诺明预防,因为这种治疗方法能够预防感染艾滋病毒的成人肺囊虫性肺炎的死亡。在过去的21年里,已经有证据表明,在患有HEU的婴儿中使用复方新诺明预防,包括两项随机对照试验,没有显示出临床益处,而且抗生素耐药性和微生物群失调增加。此外,在过去二十年中,母婴抗逆转录病毒治疗和预防方面的保健得到改善,特别是疫苗接种方案得到改善,大大降低了艾滋病毒传播的风险,并降低了因肺炎和腹泻病感染高尿毒症婴儿的总体发病率和死亡率。在此,我们强调卫生保健方面的这些变化以及不变的复方新诺明预防指南,并呼吁在公共卫生和伦理方法的基础上对这些指南进行修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信