Implementing the HEART score in an NHS emergency department: can identity leadership combined with quality improvement promote racial equality?

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Rangani Handagala, Buddhike Sri Harsha Indrasena, Prakash Subedi, Mohammed Shihaam Nizam, Jill Aylott
{"title":"Implementing the HEART score in an NHS emergency department: can identity leadership combined with quality improvement promote racial equality?","authors":"Rangani Handagala,&nbsp;Buddhike Sri Harsha Indrasena,&nbsp;Prakash Subedi,&nbsp;Mohammed Shihaam Nizam,&nbsp;Jill Aylott","doi":"10.1108/LHS-04-2022-0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this paper is to report on the dynamics of \"identity leadership\" with a quality improvement project undertaken by an International Medical Graduate (IMG) from Sri Lanka, on a two year Medical Training Initiative (MTI) placement in the National Health Service (NHS) [Academy of Medical Royal Colleges (AoMRC), 2017]. A combined MTI rotation with an integrated Fellowship in Quality Improvement (Subedi <i>et al.</i>, 2019) provided the driver to implement the HEART score (HS) in an NHS Emergency Department (ED) in the UK. The project was undertaken across ED, Acute Medicine and Cardiology at the hospital, with stakeholders emphasizing different and conflicting priorities to improve the pathway for chest pain patients.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>A social identity approach to leadership provided a framework to understand the insider/outsider approach to leadership which helped RH to negotiate and navigate the conflicting priorities from each departments' perspective. A staff survey tool was undertaken to identify reasons for the lack of implementation of a clinical protocol for chest pain patients, specifically with reference to the use of the HS. A consensus was reached to develop and implement the pathway for multi-disciplinary use of the HS and a quality improvement methodology (with the use of plan do study act (PDSA) cycles) was used over a period of nine months.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The results demonstrated significant improvements in the reduction (60%) of waiting time by chronic chest pain patients in the ED. The use of the HS as a stratified risk assessment tool resulted in a more efficient and safe way to manage patients. There are specific leadership challenges faced by an MTI doctor when they arrive in the NHS, as the MTI doctor is considered an outsider to the NHS, with reduced influence. Drawing upon the Social Identity Theory of Leadership, NHS Trusts can introduce inclusion strategies to enable greater alignment in social identity with doctors from overseas.</p><p><strong>Research limitations/implications: </strong>More than one third of doctors (40%) in the English NHS are IMGs and identify as black and minority ethnic (GMC, 2019a) a trend that sees no sign of abating as the NHS continues its international medical workforce recruitment strategy for its survival (NHS England, 2019; Beech <i>et al.</i>, 2019). IMGs can provide significant value to improving the NHS using skills developed from their own health-care system. This paper recommends a need for reciprocal learning from low to medium income countries by UK doctors to encourage the development of an inclusive global medical social identity.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>This quality improvement research combined with identity leadership provides new insights into how overseas doctors can successfully lead sustainable improvement across different departments within one hospital in the NHS.</p>","PeriodicalId":46165,"journal":{"name":"Leadership in Health Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership in Health Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/LHS-04-2022-0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to report on the dynamics of "identity leadership" with a quality improvement project undertaken by an International Medical Graduate (IMG) from Sri Lanka, on a two year Medical Training Initiative (MTI) placement in the National Health Service (NHS) [Academy of Medical Royal Colleges (AoMRC), 2017]. A combined MTI rotation with an integrated Fellowship in Quality Improvement (Subedi et al., 2019) provided the driver to implement the HEART score (HS) in an NHS Emergency Department (ED) in the UK. The project was undertaken across ED, Acute Medicine and Cardiology at the hospital, with stakeholders emphasizing different and conflicting priorities to improve the pathway for chest pain patients.

Design/methodology/approach: A social identity approach to leadership provided a framework to understand the insider/outsider approach to leadership which helped RH to negotiate and navigate the conflicting priorities from each departments' perspective. A staff survey tool was undertaken to identify reasons for the lack of implementation of a clinical protocol for chest pain patients, specifically with reference to the use of the HS. A consensus was reached to develop and implement the pathway for multi-disciplinary use of the HS and a quality improvement methodology (with the use of plan do study act (PDSA) cycles) was used over a period of nine months.

Findings: The results demonstrated significant improvements in the reduction (60%) of waiting time by chronic chest pain patients in the ED. The use of the HS as a stratified risk assessment tool resulted in a more efficient and safe way to manage patients. There are specific leadership challenges faced by an MTI doctor when they arrive in the NHS, as the MTI doctor is considered an outsider to the NHS, with reduced influence. Drawing upon the Social Identity Theory of Leadership, NHS Trusts can introduce inclusion strategies to enable greater alignment in social identity with doctors from overseas.

Research limitations/implications: More than one third of doctors (40%) in the English NHS are IMGs and identify as black and minority ethnic (GMC, 2019a) a trend that sees no sign of abating as the NHS continues its international medical workforce recruitment strategy for its survival (NHS England, 2019; Beech et al., 2019). IMGs can provide significant value to improving the NHS using skills developed from their own health-care system. This paper recommends a need for reciprocal learning from low to medium income countries by UK doctors to encourage the development of an inclusive global medical social identity.

Originality/value: This quality improvement research combined with identity leadership provides new insights into how overseas doctors can successfully lead sustainable improvement across different departments within one hospital in the NHS.

在NHS急诊科实施HEART评分:身份领导与质量改进相结合是否能促进种族平等?
目的:本文的目的是报告斯里兰卡国际医学毕业生(IMG)在国家卫生服务(NHS)进行为期两年的医学培训计划(MTI)安置的质量改进项目中“身份领导”的动态[皇家医学学院(AoMRC), 2017]。MTI轮转与质量改进综合奖学金(Subedi等人,2019年)相结合,为英国NHS急诊科(ED)实施HEART评分(HS)提供了动力。该项目是在医院的急诊科、急症医学和心脏病科进行的,利益相关者强调不同和相互冲突的优先事项,以改善胸痛患者的途径。设计/方法/方法:社会身份的领导方法提供了一个框架来理解内部/外部的领导方法,这有助于RH从每个部门的角度来协商和处理冲突的优先事项。开展了一项工作人员调查工具,以确定缺乏实施胸痛患者临床方案的原因,特别是参考HS的使用。达成共识,制定和实施HS的多学科使用途径,并在9个月的时间内使用了质量改进方法(使用计划-研究-行为(PDSA)周期)。研究结果:结果显示,慢性胸痛患者在急诊科的等待时间显著减少(60%)。使用HS作为分层风险评估工具,可以更有效、更安全地管理患者。当MTI医生进入NHS时,他们面临着具体的领导挑战,因为MTI医生被认为是NHS的局外人,影响力较小。借鉴领导的社会认同理论,NHS信托可以引入包容策略,使社会认同与海外医生更大的一致性。研究局限性/影响:英国NHS中超过三分之一(40%)的医生是img,被认为是黑人和少数民族(GMC, 2019),随着NHS继续其国际医疗人力招聘战略以维持其生存,这一趋势没有减弱的迹象(NHS England, 2019;Beech et al., 2019)。img可以利用从其本国保健系统发展出来的技能,为改善国民保健制度提供重大价值。本文建议英国医生需要从中低收入国家相互学习,以鼓励包容性全球医疗社会认同的发展。原创性/价值:这种结合身份领导力的质量改进研究为海外医生如何在NHS一家医院内成功领导不同部门的可持续改进提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Leadership in Health Services
Leadership in Health Services HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
17.60%
发文量
51
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信