Avoidance behaviour modulates but does not condition phonophobia in migraine.

Nara Ikumi, Xim Cerda-Company, Angela Marti-Marca, Adrià Vilà-Balló, Edoardo Caronna, Victor José Gallardo, Patricia Pozo-Rosich
{"title":"Avoidance behaviour modulates but does not condition phonophobia in migraine.","authors":"Nara Ikumi,&nbsp;Xim Cerda-Company,&nbsp;Angela Marti-Marca,&nbsp;Adrià Vilà-Balló,&nbsp;Edoardo Caronna,&nbsp;Victor José Gallardo,&nbsp;Patricia Pozo-Rosich","doi":"10.1177/03331024221111772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Past studies do not account for avoidance behaviour in migraine as a potential confounder of phonophobia.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyse whether phonophobia is partially driven by avoidance behaviour when using the classic methodology (method of limits).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a case-control study where we tested phonophobia in a cohort of high-frequency/chronic migraine patients (15.5 ± 0.74 headache days/month) and non-headache controls. Auditory stimuli, delivered in both ears, were presented using three different paradigms: the method of limits, the method of constant stimuli, and the adaptive method. Participants were asked to report how bothersome each tone was until a sound aversion threshold was estimated for each method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, we successfully replicate previously reported reduction in sound aversion threshold using three different methods in a group of 35 patients and 25 controls (p &lt; 0.0001). Avoidance behaviour in migraine reduced sound aversion threshold in the method of limits (p = 0.0002) and the adaptive method (p &lt; 0.0001) when compared to the method of constant stimuli. While thresholds in controls remained the same across methods (method of limits, p = 0.9877 and adaptive method, p = 1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Avoidance behaviour can exacerbate phonophobia. The current methodology to measure phonophobia needs to be revised.</p>","PeriodicalId":195255,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache","volume":" ","pages":"1305-1316"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024221111772","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Past studies do not account for avoidance behaviour in migraine as a potential confounder of phonophobia.

Objective: To analyse whether phonophobia is partially driven by avoidance behaviour when using the classic methodology (method of limits).

Methods: This is a case-control study where we tested phonophobia in a cohort of high-frequency/chronic migraine patients (15.5 ± 0.74 headache days/month) and non-headache controls. Auditory stimuli, delivered in both ears, were presented using three different paradigms: the method of limits, the method of constant stimuli, and the adaptive method. Participants were asked to report how bothersome each tone was until a sound aversion threshold was estimated for each method.

Results: In this study, we successfully replicate previously reported reduction in sound aversion threshold using three different methods in a group of 35 patients and 25 controls (p < 0.0001). Avoidance behaviour in migraine reduced sound aversion threshold in the method of limits (p = 0.0002) and the adaptive method (p < 0.0001) when compared to the method of constant stimuli. While thresholds in controls remained the same across methods (method of limits, p = 0.9877 and adaptive method, p = 1).

Conclusion: Avoidance behaviour can exacerbate phonophobia. The current methodology to measure phonophobia needs to be revised.

回避行为调节但不限制偏头痛中的恐音症。
背景:过去的研究并没有说明偏头痛患者的回避行为是语音恐惧症的潜在混杂因素。目的:分析使用经典方法(极限法)时,语音恐惧症是否部分由回避行为驱动。方法:这是一项病例对照研究,我们在高频/慢性偏头痛患者(15.5±0.74头痛天/月)和非头痛对照组中测试了声音恐惧症。双耳传递的听觉刺激采用三种不同的范式:限制法、恒定刺激法和自适应法。参与者被要求报告每种音调有多烦人,直到每种方法估计出一个声音厌恶阈值。结果:在这项研究中,我们成功地在35名患者和25名对照组中使用三种不同的方法复制了先前报道的声音厌恶阈值的降低(p < 0.0001)。与恒定刺激法相比,偏头痛患者的回避行为在限制法(p = 0.0002)和适应性法(p < 0.0001)中降低了声音厌恶阈值。而对照组的阈值在不同的方法中保持不变(极限法,p = 0.9877,自适应法,p = 1)。结论:回避行为可加重恐音症。目前衡量电话恐惧症的方法需要修订。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信