Nara Ikumi, Xim Cerda-Company, Angela Marti-Marca, Adrià Vilà-Balló, Edoardo Caronna, Victor José Gallardo, Patricia Pozo-Rosich
{"title":"Avoidance behaviour modulates but does not condition phonophobia in migraine.","authors":"Nara Ikumi, Xim Cerda-Company, Angela Marti-Marca, Adrià Vilà-Balló, Edoardo Caronna, Victor José Gallardo, Patricia Pozo-Rosich","doi":"10.1177/03331024221111772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Past studies do not account for avoidance behaviour in migraine as a potential confounder of phonophobia.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyse whether phonophobia is partially driven by avoidance behaviour when using the classic methodology (method of limits).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a case-control study where we tested phonophobia in a cohort of high-frequency/chronic migraine patients (15.5 ± 0.74 headache days/month) and non-headache controls. Auditory stimuli, delivered in both ears, were presented using three different paradigms: the method of limits, the method of constant stimuli, and the adaptive method. Participants were asked to report how bothersome each tone was until a sound aversion threshold was estimated for each method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, we successfully replicate previously reported reduction in sound aversion threshold using three different methods in a group of 35 patients and 25 controls (p < 0.0001). Avoidance behaviour in migraine reduced sound aversion threshold in the method of limits (p = 0.0002) and the adaptive method (p < 0.0001) when compared to the method of constant stimuli. While thresholds in controls remained the same across methods (method of limits, p = 0.9877 and adaptive method, p = 1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Avoidance behaviour can exacerbate phonophobia. The current methodology to measure phonophobia needs to be revised.</p>","PeriodicalId":195255,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache","volume":" ","pages":"1305-1316"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024221111772","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background: Past studies do not account for avoidance behaviour in migraine as a potential confounder of phonophobia.
Objective: To analyse whether phonophobia is partially driven by avoidance behaviour when using the classic methodology (method of limits).
Methods: This is a case-control study where we tested phonophobia in a cohort of high-frequency/chronic migraine patients (15.5 ± 0.74 headache days/month) and non-headache controls. Auditory stimuli, delivered in both ears, were presented using three different paradigms: the method of limits, the method of constant stimuli, and the adaptive method. Participants were asked to report how bothersome each tone was until a sound aversion threshold was estimated for each method.
Results: In this study, we successfully replicate previously reported reduction in sound aversion threshold using three different methods in a group of 35 patients and 25 controls (p < 0.0001). Avoidance behaviour in migraine reduced sound aversion threshold in the method of limits (p = 0.0002) and the adaptive method (p < 0.0001) when compared to the method of constant stimuli. While thresholds in controls remained the same across methods (method of limits, p = 0.9877 and adaptive method, p = 1).
Conclusion: Avoidance behaviour can exacerbate phonophobia. The current methodology to measure phonophobia needs to be revised.