Comparison of Early versus Late Below Knee Amputation After Trauma With Standardized Prosthetic Care.

Q3 Medicine
The Iowa orthopaedic journal Pub Date : 2022-06-01
Gabrielle Bui, Joseph Buckwalter, Jason Wilken, John Davison, Jeffrey Palmer, Don Shurr, Nathan Davidson, Ignacio Gracia-Fleury, Michael Willey
{"title":"Comparison of Early versus Late Below Knee Amputation After Trauma With Standardized Prosthetic Care.","authors":"Gabrielle Bui,&nbsp;Joseph Buckwalter,&nbsp;Jason Wilken,&nbsp;John Davison,&nbsp;Jeffrey Palmer,&nbsp;Don Shurr,&nbsp;Nathan Davidson,&nbsp;Ignacio Gracia-Fleury,&nbsp;Michael Willey","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High energy, lower extremity trauma is associated with longstanding pain and functional limitations. The clinical decision to proceed with early amputation or limb salvage is often controversial. This study was designed to compare differences in complications, costs, and clinical outcomes of below knee amputation (BKA) performed early after injury or after attempted limb salvage in a hospital with standardized prosthetic care following amputation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective comparative study of subjects who underwent BKA for a traumatic injury at a single level 1 trauma center and received standardized prosthetic care from a single manufacturer from 1999-2016 with minimum 2-year post-amputation follow up. Outcomes collected included demographics, surgical management, unplanned re-operations, and hospital and prosthetic cost data 2 years from time of injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 79 subjects met criteria. Early amputation (EA) was defined by median duration between injury and amputation (6 weeks) with 41 subjects in the EA group and 38 subjects in the late amputation (LA) group. Subjects in the EA group were more likely to have open fractures, high energy mechanism, and less likely to have medical comorbidities. Post-amputation infection was common in both groups (17/41 (42%) vs 17/38 (45%), p=0.77). Subjects undergoing EA were more likely to require unplanned post-amputation revision, 22/41 (54%) versus 10/38 (27%), p=0.017. Hospital costs and prosthetics/orthotics costs from the time of injury to two years following amputation were comparable, with mean hospital EA costs $136,044 versus LA costs $125,065, p=0.38. Mean prosthetics/orthotics costs of EA subjects were $33,252 versus LA costs $37,684, p=0.59.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Unplanned post-amputation revision surgeries were more common when BKA was performed early after trauma. Otherwise, outcomes and cost were comparable when amputation was performed early versus late. <b>Level of Evidence: IV</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":35582,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","volume":" ","pages":"89-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9210393/pdf/IOJ-42-01-089.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High energy, lower extremity trauma is associated with longstanding pain and functional limitations. The clinical decision to proceed with early amputation or limb salvage is often controversial. This study was designed to compare differences in complications, costs, and clinical outcomes of below knee amputation (BKA) performed early after injury or after attempted limb salvage in a hospital with standardized prosthetic care following amputation.

Methods: This is a retrospective comparative study of subjects who underwent BKA for a traumatic injury at a single level 1 trauma center and received standardized prosthetic care from a single manufacturer from 1999-2016 with minimum 2-year post-amputation follow up. Outcomes collected included demographics, surgical management, unplanned re-operations, and hospital and prosthetic cost data 2 years from time of injury.

Results: Overall, 79 subjects met criteria. Early amputation (EA) was defined by median duration between injury and amputation (6 weeks) with 41 subjects in the EA group and 38 subjects in the late amputation (LA) group. Subjects in the EA group were more likely to have open fractures, high energy mechanism, and less likely to have medical comorbidities. Post-amputation infection was common in both groups (17/41 (42%) vs 17/38 (45%), p=0.77). Subjects undergoing EA were more likely to require unplanned post-amputation revision, 22/41 (54%) versus 10/38 (27%), p=0.017. Hospital costs and prosthetics/orthotics costs from the time of injury to two years following amputation were comparable, with mean hospital EA costs $136,044 versus LA costs $125,065, p=0.38. Mean prosthetics/orthotics costs of EA subjects were $33,252 versus LA costs $37,684, p=0.59.

Conclusion: Unplanned post-amputation revision surgeries were more common when BKA was performed early after trauma. Otherwise, outcomes and cost were comparable when amputation was performed early versus late. Level of Evidence: IV.

Abstract Image

创伤后早期与晚期膝关节下截肢与标准化假肢护理的比较。
背景:高能量,下肢创伤与长期疼痛和功能限制有关。临床决定进行早期截肢或保肢经常是有争议的。本研究旨在比较受伤后早期进行膝下截肢(BKA)的并发症、成本和临床结果的差异,或在医院进行截肢后标准化的假肢护理后尝试保留肢体。方法:这是一项回顾性比较研究,研究对象为1999-2016年在单一一级创伤中心接受创伤性BKA治疗的创伤性损伤患者,并接受单一制造商的标准化假肢护理,截肢后随访至少2年。收集的结果包括人口统计学、手术管理、计划外再手术以及受伤后2年的住院和假体费用数据。结果:总体而言,79名受试者符合标准。早期截肢(EA)定义为损伤至截肢的中位时间(6周),EA组41例,LA组38例。EA组的受试者更有可能出现开放性骨折、高能机制,并且更少可能出现医学合并症。截肢后感染在两组中都很常见(17/41 (42%)vs 17/38 (45%), p=0.77)。接受EA的受试者更有可能需要非计划的截肢后翻修,22/41(54%)比10/38 (27%),p=0.017。从受伤到截肢后两年的医院费用和假肢/矫形器费用具有可比性,平均医院EA费用为136,044美元,而LA费用为125,065美元,p=0.38。EA受试者的假肢/矫形器平均费用为33,252美元,LA为37,684美元,p=0.59。结论:创伤后早期行BKA手术时,非计划截肢后翻修手术更为常见。除此之外,早期和晚期截肢的结果和成本是相当的。证据等级:四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Iowa orthopaedic journal
The Iowa orthopaedic journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Any original article relevant to orthopaedic surgery, orthopaedic science or the teaching of either will be considered for publication in The Iowa Orthopaedic Journal. Articles will be enthusiastically received from alumni, visitors to the department, members of the Iowa Orthopaedic Society, residents, and friends of The University of Iowa Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation. The journal is published every June.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信