Guideline-directed medical therapy in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction in Oman: utilization, reasons behind non-prescribing, and dose optimization.

IF 2.4 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacy Practice-Granada Pub Date : 2022-04-01 Epub Date: 2022-04-13 DOI:10.18549/PharmPract.2022.2.2642
Safiya Al-Aghbari, Juhaina Salim Al-Maqbali, Abdullah M Al Alawi, Mohammed Al Za'abi, Ibrahim Al-Zakwani
{"title":"Guideline-directed medical therapy in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction in Oman: utilization, reasons behind non-prescribing, and dose optimization.","authors":"Safiya Al-Aghbari, Juhaina Salim Al-Maqbali, Abdullah M Al Alawi, Mohammed Al Za'abi, Ibrahim Al-Zakwani","doi":"10.18549/PharmPract.2022.2.2642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background objective: </strong>To determine the reasons behind guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) non-prescribing, drug utilization before and after excluding those intolerable to GDMT, as well as dose optimization in heart failure (HF) patients with reduced ejection fraction (<40%) (HFrEF) in Oman.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included HF patients seen at the medical outpatient clinics at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman, between January 2016 and December 2019 and followed up until the end of June 2021. The use of renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) blockers (angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs)), beta blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) were evaluated as per the European, American, and Canadian HF guidelines. Analyses were performed using univariate statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 171 HFrEF patients were enrolled for this study, the overall mean age of the cohort was 63 ± 15 years old and 59% were male. Over 65% of the patients had chronic kidney disease. Almost 55% of the patients were intolerable to GDMT. The proportion of patients on beta blockers, RAS blockers/ hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate combination, and MRAs, before and after excluding those intolerable to GDMT, were 89%, 97%, and 77%, and, 94%, 47% and 85%, respectively, while the proportion of patients on the GDMT combination concomitantly was 41% and 83%, respectively. A total of 61%, 44% and 100% of the patients were prescribed ≥50% of the target dose for beta blockers, RAS blockers/ HYD-ISDN combination and MRAs respectively, while 19%, 8.2% and 94% of the patients attained 100% of the target dose for beta blockers, RAS blockers/ HYD-ISDN combination and MRAs respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reasons behind GDMT non-prescribing were frequent and not clearly obvious in patients' medical notes. The majority of the patients were prescribed GDMT. However, dose optimization, specifically for beta blockers and RAS blockers/ HYD-ISDN combination, was still suboptimal. The findings should be interpreted in the context of low study power and that future studies, with larger sample sizes, are warranted to minimize this limitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51762,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy Practice-Granada","volume":"20 2","pages":"2642"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/af/83/pharmpract-20-2642.PMC9296089.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy Practice-Granada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2022.2.2642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background objective: To determine the reasons behind guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) non-prescribing, drug utilization before and after excluding those intolerable to GDMT, as well as dose optimization in heart failure (HF) patients with reduced ejection fraction (<40%) (HFrEF) in Oman.

Methods: The study included HF patients seen at the medical outpatient clinics at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman, between January 2016 and December 2019 and followed up until the end of June 2021. The use of renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) blockers (angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs)), beta blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) were evaluated as per the European, American, and Canadian HF guidelines. Analyses were performed using univariate statistics.

Results: A total of 171 HFrEF patients were enrolled for this study, the overall mean age of the cohort was 63 ± 15 years old and 59% were male. Over 65% of the patients had chronic kidney disease. Almost 55% of the patients were intolerable to GDMT. The proportion of patients on beta blockers, RAS blockers/ hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate combination, and MRAs, before and after excluding those intolerable to GDMT, were 89%, 97%, and 77%, and, 94%, 47% and 85%, respectively, while the proportion of patients on the GDMT combination concomitantly was 41% and 83%, respectively. A total of 61%, 44% and 100% of the patients were prescribed ≥50% of the target dose for beta blockers, RAS blockers/ HYD-ISDN combination and MRAs respectively, while 19%, 8.2% and 94% of the patients attained 100% of the target dose for beta blockers, RAS blockers/ HYD-ISDN combination and MRAs respectively.

Conclusions: Reasons behind GDMT non-prescribing were frequent and not clearly obvious in patients' medical notes. The majority of the patients were prescribed GDMT. However, dose optimization, specifically for beta blockers and RAS blockers/ HYD-ISDN combination, was still suboptimal. The findings should be interpreted in the context of low study power and that future studies, with larger sample sizes, are warranted to minimize this limitation.

Abstract Image

阿曼射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者指南指导的药物治疗:使用、不开处方的原因和剂量优化。
背景目标:确定射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HF)患者未使用指导性医疗疗法(GDMT)的原因、排除不能耐受GDMT的患者前后的药物使用情况以及剂量优化情况(方法:研究纳入2016年1月至2019年12月期间在阿曼马斯喀特苏丹卡布斯大学医院内科门诊就诊的HF患者,随访至2020年6月底:研究对象包括2016年1月至2019年12月期间在阿曼马斯喀特苏丹卡布斯大学医院内科门诊就诊并随访至2021年6月底的高血压患者。根据欧洲、美国和加拿大的高血压指南,对肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)阻断剂(血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)或血管紧张素 II 受体阻断剂(ARB)或血管紧张素受体-去甲肾上腺素抑制剂(ARNI))、β受体阻断剂和矿物皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)的使用情况进行了评估。分析采用单变量统计:本研究共招募了 171 名高频低氧血症患者,总平均年龄为 63 ± 15 岁,59% 为男性。超过 65% 的患者患有慢性肾病。近 55% 的患者不能耐受 GDMT。在排除对 GDMT 不耐受的患者之前和之后,使用β受体阻滞剂、RAS 受体阻滞剂/水蛭素-二硝酸异山梨酯复方制剂和 MRA 的患者比例分别为 89%、97% 和 77%,以及 94%、47% 和 85%,而同时使用 GDMT 复方制剂的患者比例分别为 41% 和 83%。分别有61%、44%和100%的患者服用β受体阻滞剂、RAS受体阻滞剂/HYD-ISDN复方制剂和MRA的剂量≥目标剂量的50%,而分别有19%、8.2%和94%的患者服用β受体阻滞剂、RAS受体阻滞剂/HYD-ISDN复方制剂和MRA的剂量达到目标剂量的100%:未开具 GDMT 处方的原因很多,而且在患者的医疗记录中并不明显。大多数患者获得了 GDMT 处方。然而,剂量优化,尤其是β受体阻滞剂和RAS受体阻滞剂/HYD-ISDN联合用药的剂量优化仍不理想。在解释研究结果时,应考虑到研究功率较低的情况,而且未来的研究需要更大的样本量,以尽量减少这一局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacy Practice-Granada
Pharmacy Practice-Granada PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
113
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmacy Practice is a free full-text peer-reviewed journal with a scope on pharmacy practice. Pharmacy Practice is published quarterly. Pharmacy Practice does not charge and will never charge any publication fee or article processing charge (APC) to the authors. The current and future absence of any article processing charges (APCs) is signed in the MoU with the Center for Pharmacy Practice Innovation (CPPI) at Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) School of Pharmacy. Pharmacy Practice is the consequence of the efforts of a number of colleagues from different Universities who belief in collaborative publishing: no one pays, no one receives. Although focusing on the practice of pharmacy, Pharmacy Practice covers a wide range of pharmacy activities, among them and not being comprehensive, clinical pharmacy, pharmaceutical care, social pharmacy, pharmacy education, process and outcome research, health promotion and education, health informatics, pharmacoepidemiology, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信