International Classification of Diseases clinical coding training: An international survey.

Lucia Otero Varela, Chelsea Doktorchik, Natalie Wiebe, Danielle A Southern, Søren Knudsen, Pallavi Mathur, Hude Quan, Cathy A Eastwood
{"title":"International Classification of Diseases clinical coding training: An international survey.","authors":"Lucia Otero Varela, Chelsea Doktorchik, Natalie Wiebe, Danielle A Southern, Søren Knudsen, Pallavi Mathur, Hude Quan, Cathy A Eastwood","doi":"10.1177/18333583221106509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The International Classification of Diseases (ICD) is widely used by clinical coders worldwide for clinical coding morbidity data into administrative health databases. Accordingly, hospital data quality largely depends on the coders' skills acquired during ICD training, which varies greatly across countries.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterise the current landscape of international ICD clinical coding training.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An online questionnaire was created to survey the 194 World Health Organization (WHO) member countries. Questions focused on the training provided to clinical coding professionals. The survey was distributed to potential participants who met specific criteria, and to organisations specialised in the topic, such as WHO Collaborating Centres, to be forwarded to their representatives. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 47 respondents from 26 countries revealed disparities in all inquired topics. However, most participants reported clinical coders as the primary person assigning ICD codes. Although training was available in all countries, some did not mandate training qualifications, and those that did differed in type and duration of training, with college or university degree being most common. Clinical coding certificates most frequently entailed passing a certification exam. Most countries offered continuing training opportunities, and provided a range of support resources for clinical coders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Variability in clinical coder training could affect data collection worldwide, thus potentially hindering international comparability of health data.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>These findings could encourage countries to improve their resources and training programs available for clinical coders and will ultimately be valuable to the WHO for the standardisation of ICD training.</p>","PeriodicalId":73210,"journal":{"name":"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia","volume":" ","pages":"68-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11067421/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18333583221106509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The International Classification of Diseases (ICD) is widely used by clinical coders worldwide for clinical coding morbidity data into administrative health databases. Accordingly, hospital data quality largely depends on the coders' skills acquired during ICD training, which varies greatly across countries.

Objective: To characterise the current landscape of international ICD clinical coding training.

Method: An online questionnaire was created to survey the 194 World Health Organization (WHO) member countries. Questions focused on the training provided to clinical coding professionals. The survey was distributed to potential participants who met specific criteria, and to organisations specialised in the topic, such as WHO Collaborating Centres, to be forwarded to their representatives. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics.

Results: Data from 47 respondents from 26 countries revealed disparities in all inquired topics. However, most participants reported clinical coders as the primary person assigning ICD codes. Although training was available in all countries, some did not mandate training qualifications, and those that did differed in type and duration of training, with college or university degree being most common. Clinical coding certificates most frequently entailed passing a certification exam. Most countries offered continuing training opportunities, and provided a range of support resources for clinical coders.

Conclusion: Variability in clinical coder training could affect data collection worldwide, thus potentially hindering international comparability of health data.

Implications: These findings could encourage countries to improve their resources and training programs available for clinical coders and will ultimately be valuable to the WHO for the standardisation of ICD training.

国际疾病分类临床编码培训:国际调查。
背景:国际疾病分类(ICD)被全世界的临床编码人员广泛用于将发病率数据编入行政卫生数据库。因此,医院数据的质量在很大程度上取决于编码员在 ICD 培训期间所掌握的技能,而各国的培训情况差异很大:目的:描述目前国际 ICD 临床编码培训的现状:方法:我们制作了一份在线问卷,对世界卫生组织(WHO)的 194 个成员国进行了调查。问题主要集中在为临床编码专业人员提供的培训上。调查表分发给符合特定标准的潜在参与者,以及世界卫生组织合作中心等专门组织,并转发给他们的代表。调查采用描述性统计方法对答复进行分析:来自 26 个国家的 47 位受访者提供的数据显示,所有调查主题都存在差异。不过,大多数参与者称临床编码员是分配 ICD 代码的主要人员。虽然所有国家都提供培训,但有些国家并没有规定培训资格,而那些规定了培训资格的国家在培训类型和持续时间上也各不相同,其中大专或大学学历最为常见。临床编码证书最常见的要求是通过认证考试。大多数国家提供继续培训机会,并为临床编码员提供一系列支持资源:结论:临床编码员培训方面的差异可能会影响全球范围内的数据收集,从而有可能阻碍健康数据的国际可比性:这些发现可以鼓励各国改善其为临床编码员提供的资源和培训计划,最终将对世界卫生组织实现 ICD 培训标准化具有重要价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信