Regional and Acute Pain Anesthesiology Post COVID-19 Assessment and Recommendations for Fellowship Web Based Platforms.

IF 1.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY

Local and Regional Anesthesia Pub Date : 2022-07-07 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2147/LRA.S369147

Vladislav Pavlovich Zhitny, Enes Djesevic, Gemma Lagasca, Aziza Dhalai, Brian J Mendelson

{"title":"Regional and Acute Pain Anesthesiology Post COVID-19 Assessment and Recommendations for Fellowship Web Based Platforms.","authors":"Vladislav Pavlovich Zhitny, Enes Djesevic, Gemma Lagasca, Aziza Dhalai, Brian J Mendelson","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S369147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In today's applicant landscape, the SARS-COV-2 pandemic has drastically altered the traditional model of in-person interviews shifting it to an online format often conducted by web-based applications. Fellowship programs and naturally fellowship program directors face a new challenge of standardizing information to be distributed to prospective fellowship applicants through American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA) common application. Here we describe a set of 11 criteria recommended by other similar studies selected for evaluation of online program training platforms, where only 13.3% of the acute and regional pain fellowship program online platforms met 75% of the criteria with limited presence in areas of research, rotation schedules, list of fellows, alumni, and life in the area. Additional considerations pertaining to the types of procedures performed, evaluation, mentorship, academic involvement, and teaching should be undertaken by the programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":"57-60"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c5/da/lra-15-57.PMC9273625.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S369147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

In today's applicant landscape, the SARS-COV-2 pandemic has drastically altered the traditional model of in-person interviews shifting it to an online format often conducted by web-based applications. Fellowship programs and naturally fellowship program directors face a new challenge of standardizing information to be distributed to prospective fellowship applicants through American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA) common application. Here we describe a set of 11 criteria recommended by other similar studies selected for evaluation of online program training platforms, where only 13.3% of the acute and regional pain fellowship program online platforms met 75% of the criteria with limited presence in areas of research, rotation schedules, list of fellows, alumni, and life in the area. Additional considerations pertaining to the types of procedures performed, evaluation, mentorship, academic involvement, and teaching should be undertaken by the programs.

查看原文本刊更多论文

区域和急性疼痛麻醉学COVID-19后评估和基于奖学金网络平台的建议。

在当今的求职者环境中，新冠肺炎大流行彻底改变了面对面面试的传统模式，将其转变为通常由基于网络的应用程序进行的在线形式。奖学金项目和奖学金项目主管自然面临着新的挑战，即通过美国区域麻醉和疼痛医学协会(ASRA)的共同申请向潜在的奖学金申请人分发标准化的信息。在这里，我们描述了一组由其他类似研究推荐的11个标准，用于评估在线项目培训平台，其中只有13.3%的急性和局部疼痛奖学金项目在线平台达到75%的标准，在研究、轮换时间表、研究员名单、校友和该领域的生活方面存在有限。有关程序类型、评估、指导、学术参与和教学的其他考虑应由项目承担。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊