Intimate Pride: a Tri-Nation Study on Associations between Positive Minority Identity Aspects and Relationship Quality in Sexual Minorities from German-Speaking Countries.

Magdalena Siegel, Ashley K Randall, Pamela J Lannutti, Melanie S Fischer, Yuvamathi Gandhi, Raphaela Lukas, Nathalie Meuwly, Orsolya Rosta-Filep, Katharina van Stein, Beate Ditzen, Tamás Martos, Carmen Schneckenreiter, Casey J Totenhagen, Martina Zemp
{"title":"Intimate Pride: a Tri-Nation Study on Associations between Positive Minority Identity Aspects and Relationship Quality in Sexual Minorities from German-Speaking Countries.","authors":"Magdalena Siegel, Ashley K Randall, Pamela J Lannutti, Melanie S Fischer, Yuvamathi Gandhi, Raphaela Lukas, Nathalie Meuwly, Orsolya Rosta-Filep, Katharina van Stein, Beate Ditzen, Tamás Martos, Carmen Schneckenreiter, Casey J Totenhagen, Martina Zemp","doi":"10.1007/s41042-022-00070-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Investigations into the intimate relationships of sexual minorities are proliferating, but often adopt a deficit-oriented and US-centered perspective. In this tri-nation online study with sexual minority participants from Austria, Germany, and Switzerland (N = 571), we (i) assessed the construct validity of the German version of a well-known measure for positive minority identity aspects (the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual Positive Identity Measure; LGB-PIM), and (ii) explored associations between these aspects (self-awareness, authenticity, community, capacity for intimacy, and social justice) and self-reported relationship quality. Model fit of the German version of the LGB-PIM was deemed acceptable. Higher levels of positive minority identity aspects showed small to moderate associations with higher levels of relationship quality in bivariate analyses, but only capacity for intimacy was linked to relationship quality in higher-order models (controlling for country, age, sexual orientation, gender identity, relationship length, and psychological distress). Results remained robust in several sensitivity analyses. Our results highlight the differential role of positive identity aspects for relationship functioning, with capacity for intimacy as a fruitful leverage point for therapeutic work.</p>","PeriodicalId":73424,"journal":{"name":"International journal of applied positive psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344453/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of applied positive psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41042-022-00070-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Investigations into the intimate relationships of sexual minorities are proliferating, but often adopt a deficit-oriented and US-centered perspective. In this tri-nation online study with sexual minority participants from Austria, Germany, and Switzerland (N = 571), we (i) assessed the construct validity of the German version of a well-known measure for positive minority identity aspects (the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual Positive Identity Measure; LGB-PIM), and (ii) explored associations between these aspects (self-awareness, authenticity, community, capacity for intimacy, and social justice) and self-reported relationship quality. Model fit of the German version of the LGB-PIM was deemed acceptable. Higher levels of positive minority identity aspects showed small to moderate associations with higher levels of relationship quality in bivariate analyses, but only capacity for intimacy was linked to relationship quality in higher-order models (controlling for country, age, sexual orientation, gender identity, relationship length, and psychological distress). Results remained robust in several sensitivity analyses. Our results highlight the differential role of positive identity aspects for relationship functioning, with capacity for intimacy as a fruitful leverage point for therapeutic work.

亲密自豪感:关于德语国家性少数群体积极的少数群体身份方面与关系质量之间关系的三国研究。
有关性少数群体亲密关系的研究层出不穷,但通常采用的是以美国为中心的赤字导向视角。在这项以奥地利、德国和瑞士的性少数群体参与者(N = 571)为对象的三国在线研究中,我们(i) 评估了著名的少数群体积极身份方面测量(女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋积极身份测量;LGB-PIM)德国版的构建有效性,(ii) 探讨了这些方面(自我意识、真实性、社区、亲密关系能力和社会正义)与自我报告的关系质量之间的关联。德文版 LGB-PIM 的模型拟合度被认为是可以接受的。在双变量分析中,较高水平的积极少数群体身份认同与较高水平的关系质量之间存在小到中等程度的联系,但在高阶模型中(控制了国家、年龄、性取向、性别认同、关系长度和心理困扰),只有亲密关系能力与关系质量存在联系。在几种敏感性分析中,结果仍然是稳健的。我们的研究结果凸显了积极身份方面对人际关系功能的不同作用,而亲密关系能力则是治疗工作的一个富有成效的杠杆点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信