Awareness and Knowledge of Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Medical Students at the University of Aleppo: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Avicenna Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2022-07-03 eCollection Date: 2022-04-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1748810
Obada Zayegh, Zina Shikh Hmidi, Ahmad A Nawlo, Ahmad Al-Mouakeh, Basel Amin, Bassel Banjah, Anwar Chammout, Muhammad Alsayid
{"title":"Awareness and Knowledge of Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Medical Students at the University of Aleppo: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Obada Zayegh,&nbsp;Zina Shikh Hmidi,&nbsp;Ahmad A Nawlo,&nbsp;Ahmad Al-Mouakeh,&nbsp;Basel Amin,&nbsp;Bassel Banjah,&nbsp;Anwar Chammout,&nbsp;Muhammad Alsayid","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1748810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>  Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of malignancy in Syria. The aim of our study was to assess the awareness and knowledge of CRC and its screening methods among medical students at the University of Aleppo. <b>Methods</b>  A cross-sectional study of medical students at the University of Aleppo was conducted using a self-administered 12-element questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of demographics, awareness of CRC, knowledge of CRC and its screening methods. Awareness of CRC included three questions asking students if they ever heard of CRC and its screening methods. Knowledge of CRC was evaluated through three sets of questions about CRC risk factors, signs and symptoms, and preventative methods. The students were selected randomly during academic lectures. A <i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables were used for statistical analysis, as appropriate. A two-sided <i>p</i>  < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. We stratified students based on pre-clinical versus clinical years and average academic score. <b>Results</b>  A total of 824 students completed the questionnaire. The majority of students were aware of CRC (98.9%) and CRC screening methods (79.8%). Students had poor knowledge of CRC risk factors (16.5% for non-modifiable factors and 11.7% for modifiable factors), signs and symptoms (52.6%), and protective factors (9.9%). Only 31.7% of students were able to identify the appropriate age to initiate screening for average-risk individuals. Clinical students had better awareness and knowledge of CRC and its screening methods. Clinical students with higher academic score showed better awareness and knowledge in some elements. <b>Conclusion</b>  Our study reported high awareness and poor knowledge rates of CRC and its screening methods among medical students at the University of Aleppo. Although clinical students had higher awareness and knowledge of CRC compared to pre-clinical students, the impact of academic score revealed variable results.</p>","PeriodicalId":32889,"journal":{"name":"Avicenna Journal of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4d/a7/10-1055-s-0042-1748810.PMC9272450.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avicenna Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1748810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background  Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of malignancy in Syria. The aim of our study was to assess the awareness and knowledge of CRC and its screening methods among medical students at the University of Aleppo. Methods  A cross-sectional study of medical students at the University of Aleppo was conducted using a self-administered 12-element questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of demographics, awareness of CRC, knowledge of CRC and its screening methods. Awareness of CRC included three questions asking students if they ever heard of CRC and its screening methods. Knowledge of CRC was evaluated through three sets of questions about CRC risk factors, signs and symptoms, and preventative methods. The students were selected randomly during academic lectures. A χ 2 or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables were used for statistical analysis, as appropriate. A two-sided p  < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. We stratified students based on pre-clinical versus clinical years and average academic score. Results  A total of 824 students completed the questionnaire. The majority of students were aware of CRC (98.9%) and CRC screening methods (79.8%). Students had poor knowledge of CRC risk factors (16.5% for non-modifiable factors and 11.7% for modifiable factors), signs and symptoms (52.6%), and protective factors (9.9%). Only 31.7% of students were able to identify the appropriate age to initiate screening for average-risk individuals. Clinical students had better awareness and knowledge of CRC and its screening methods. Clinical students with higher academic score showed better awareness and knowledge in some elements. Conclusion  Our study reported high awareness and poor knowledge rates of CRC and its screening methods among medical students at the University of Aleppo. Although clinical students had higher awareness and knowledge of CRC compared to pre-clinical students, the impact of academic score revealed variable results.

阿勒颇大学医学生对结直肠癌筛查的认知和知识:一项横断面研究
结直肠癌(CRC)是叙利亚第三大恶性肿瘤。本研究的目的是评估阿勒颇大学医学生对CRC及其筛查方法的认识和知识。方法对阿勒颇大学医学生进行横断面调查,采用自行填写的12项问卷。问卷内容包括人口统计学、对结直肠癌的认识、对结直肠癌的认识及筛查方法。对结直肠癌的认识包括三个问题,询问学生是否听说过结直肠癌及其筛查方法。通过三组关于CRC危险因素、体征和症状以及预防方法的问题来评估对CRC的认识。这些学生是在学术讲座期间随机挑选的。适当时,分类变量的χ 2检验或Fisher精确检验用于统计分析。结果共824名学生完成问卷调查。大多数学生了解CRC(98.9%)和CRC筛查方法(79.8%)。学生对结直肠癌危险因素(不可改变因素占16.5%,可改变因素占11.7%)、体征和症状(52.6%)、保护因素(9.9%)的认识较差。只有31.7%的学生能够确定合适的年龄开始对平均风险个体进行筛查。临床学生对结直肠癌及其筛查方法的认识和知识较好。临床生学业成绩越高,对某些要素的认知程度越高。结论本研究报告了阿勒颇大学医学生对结直肠癌及其筛查方法的高知晓率和低知晓率。虽然临床生对结直肠癌的认知和知识高于临床前生,但学业成绩的影响显示出不同的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信