The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Elderly: Population Fatality Rates, COVID Mortality Percentage, and Life Expectancy Loss.

The elder law journal Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-17
Paula Natalia Barreto Parra, Vladimir Atanasov, Jeff Whittle, John Meurer, Qian Eric Luo, Ruohao Zhang, Bernard Black
{"title":"The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Elderly: Population Fatality Rates, COVID Mortality Percentage, and Life Expectancy Loss.","authors":"Paula Natalia Barreto Parra,&nbsp;Vladimir Atanasov,&nbsp;Jeff Whittle,&nbsp;John Meurer,&nbsp;Qian Eric Luo,&nbsp;Ruohao Zhang,&nbsp;Bernard Black","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately affected the elderly. This Article provides a detailed analysis of those effects, drawing primarily on individual-level mortality data covering almost three million persons aged 65+ in three Midwest states (Indiana, Illinois, and Wisconsin). We report sometimes surprising findings on population fatality rates (\"PFR\"), the ratio of COVID to non-COVID deaths, reported as a percentage, which we call the \"Covid Mortality Percentage,\" and mean life expectancy loss (\"LEL\"). We examine how these COVID-19 outcomes vary with age, gender, race/ethnicity, socio-economic status, and time period during the pandemic. For all persons in the three Midwest areas, COVID PFR through year-end 2021 was 0.22%, mean years of life lost (\"YLL\") was 13.0 years, the COVID Mortality Percentage was 12.4%, and LEL was 0.028 years (eleven days). In contrast, for the elderly, PFR was 1.03%; YLL was 8.8 years, the COVID Mortality Percentage was 13.2%, and LEL was 0.091 years (thirty-four days). Controlling for gender, PFR and LEL were substantially higher for Blacks and Hispanics than for Whites at all ages. Racial/ethnic disparities for the elderly were large early in the pandemic but diminished later. Although COVID-19 mortality was much higher for the elderly, the COVID Mortality Percentage over the full pandemic period was only modestly higher for the elderly, at 13.2%, than for non-elderly adults aged 25-64, at 11.1%. Indeed, in 2021, this ratio was lower for the elderly than for the middle-aged, reflecting higher elderly vaccination rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":87150,"journal":{"name":"The elder law journal","volume":"30 ","pages":"33-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9351604/pdf/nihms-1820046.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The elder law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately affected the elderly. This Article provides a detailed analysis of those effects, drawing primarily on individual-level mortality data covering almost three million persons aged 65+ in three Midwest states (Indiana, Illinois, and Wisconsin). We report sometimes surprising findings on population fatality rates ("PFR"), the ratio of COVID to non-COVID deaths, reported as a percentage, which we call the "Covid Mortality Percentage," and mean life expectancy loss ("LEL"). We examine how these COVID-19 outcomes vary with age, gender, race/ethnicity, socio-economic status, and time period during the pandemic. For all persons in the three Midwest areas, COVID PFR through year-end 2021 was 0.22%, mean years of life lost ("YLL") was 13.0 years, the COVID Mortality Percentage was 12.4%, and LEL was 0.028 years (eleven days). In contrast, for the elderly, PFR was 1.03%; YLL was 8.8 years, the COVID Mortality Percentage was 13.2%, and LEL was 0.091 years (thirty-four days). Controlling for gender, PFR and LEL were substantially higher for Blacks and Hispanics than for Whites at all ages. Racial/ethnic disparities for the elderly were large early in the pandemic but diminished later. Although COVID-19 mortality was much higher for the elderly, the COVID Mortality Percentage over the full pandemic period was only modestly higher for the elderly, at 13.2%, than for non-elderly adults aged 25-64, at 11.1%. Indeed, in 2021, this ratio was lower for the elderly than for the middle-aged, reflecting higher elderly vaccination rates.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

COVID-19大流行对老年人的影响:人口死亡率、COVID死亡率百分比和预期寿命损失。
COVID-19大流行对老年人的影响尤为严重。本文对这些影响进行了详细的分析,主要利用了三个中西部州(印第安纳州、伊利诺伊州和威斯康星州)近300万65岁以上老年人的个人死亡率数据。我们有时会报告关于人口死亡率(“PFR”)、COVID - 19死亡与非COVID - 19死亡的比率(以百分比报告,我们称之为“COVID - 19死亡率百分比”)和平均预期寿命损失(“LEL”)的令人惊讶的发现。我们研究了COVID-19的这些结果如何随年龄、性别、种族/民族、社会经济地位和大流行期间的时间段而变化。对于中西部三个地区的所有人,截至2021年底,COVID PFR为0.22%,平均生命损失年数(“YLL”)为13.0年,COVID死亡率百分比为12.4%,LEL为0.028年(11天)。相比之下,老年人的PFR为1.03%;YLL为8.8年,病死率为13.2%,LEL为0.091年(34天)。在性别控制下,黑人和西班牙裔的PFR和LEL在所有年龄段都明显高于白人。在大流行早期,老年人的种族/民族差异很大,但后来逐渐缩小。尽管老年人的COVID-19死亡率要高得多,但在整个大流行期间,老年人的COVID-19死亡率仅略高于25-64岁非老年人的11.1%,为13.2%。事实上,在2021年,老年人的这一比例低于中年人,这反映出老年人的疫苗接种率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信