Applicability of the USPSTF Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines in a Predominantly Black Veteran Population.

Thomas N Rusher, Lekha Deere, Albert Jang, Rahul Kamat, Jaime Palomino
{"title":"Applicability of the USPSTF Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines in a Predominantly Black Veteran Population.","authors":"Thomas N Rusher,&nbsp;Lekha Deere,&nbsp;Albert Jang,&nbsp;Rahul Kamat,&nbsp;Jaime Palomino","doi":"10.12788/fp.0269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Black individuals and veterans are at higher risk for developing lung cancer compared with that of the general population. Evidence suggests the screening criteria have been too conservative for this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a retrospective chart review examining the applicability of the 2013 United States Preventive Services Task Force lung cancer screening guidelines in a US Department of Veteran Affairs institution that served a a predominantly black population. Patients diagnosed with stage 1 or 2 lung cancer from 2005 through 2017 were included and grouped by whether or not they met United States Preventive Services Task Force screening criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significantly higher proportion of Black patients in the study group that did not meet screening criteria (68% vs 54%, <i>P</i> = .04), highlighting the concern that this population was being underscreened with the 2013 guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An individualized, risk-based screening model could be more effective at diagnosing early-stage lung cancer and requires more investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":73021,"journal":{"name":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","volume":"39 Suppl 2","pages":"S48-S51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9346575/pdf/fp-39-05-s48.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Black individuals and veterans are at higher risk for developing lung cancer compared with that of the general population. Evidence suggests the screening criteria have been too conservative for this population.

Methods: This study is a retrospective chart review examining the applicability of the 2013 United States Preventive Services Task Force lung cancer screening guidelines in a US Department of Veteran Affairs institution that served a a predominantly black population. Patients diagnosed with stage 1 or 2 lung cancer from 2005 through 2017 were included and grouped by whether or not they met United States Preventive Services Task Force screening criteria.

Results: There was a significantly higher proportion of Black patients in the study group that did not meet screening criteria (68% vs 54%, P = .04), highlighting the concern that this population was being underscreened with the 2013 guidelines.

Conclusions: An individualized, risk-based screening model could be more effective at diagnosing early-stage lung cancer and requires more investigation.

USPSTF肺癌筛查指南在黑人退伍军人人群中的适用性
背景:与普通人群相比,黑人和退伍军人患肺癌的风险更高。有证据表明,筛查标准对这一人群过于保守。方法:本研究是一项回顾性图表回顾,检查2013年美国预防服务工作组肺癌筛查指南在美国退伍军人事务部机构的适用性,该机构主要为黑人提供服务。从2005年到2017年,被诊断为1期或2期肺癌的患者被纳入研究,并根据他们是否符合美国预防服务工作组的筛查标准进行分组。结果:研究组中黑人患者不符合筛查标准的比例明显更高(68% vs 54%, P = 0.04),这突出了对该人群未按照2013年指南进行筛查的担忧。结论:个体化、基于风险的筛查模式可更有效地诊断早期肺癌,但需要更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信