Analysis of clinical trial agreement and insurance policy submitted to the ethics committee of a tertiary care teaching institute in central India.

Q2 Medicine
Perspectives in Clinical Research Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2021-03-26 DOI:10.4103/picr.PICR_124_20
Mrunalini V Kalikar, Ganesh N Dakhale, Vishakha V Sinha, Akhil B Giradkar
{"title":"Analysis of clinical trial agreement and insurance policy submitted to the ethics committee of a tertiary care teaching institute in central India.","authors":"Mrunalini V Kalikar,&nbsp;Ganesh N Dakhale,&nbsp;Vishakha V Sinha,&nbsp;Akhil B Giradkar","doi":"10.4103/picr.PICR_124_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Very few studies conducted in India have analyzed insurance policies and clinical trial agreement (CTA) submitted to ethics committee (EC). This study was conducted to review and find out deficiencies in it.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective observational study. All the protocols for regulatory clinical trials and academic research sponsored by the Indian Council of Medical Research or other funding agency were included. Insurance documents and CTA submitted with the study protocols were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of seventy CTA and insurance policies were analyzed. CTA mentioned that parties involved in 60 (86%) forms, scope of the agreement in 15 (21%) forms, responsibilities of the party in 68 (97%) forms, and payment details in 58 (83%) forms. Nearly 88.5% of the insurance policies mentioned whether the policy covers the participants for injury due to all clauses and 91% of the policies mentioned the validity period of insurance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was found that both the documents contained almost all the required elements. This was probably because this institutional EC insisted on and thoroughly reviewed the documents to ensure that adequate compensation of research-related injuries has been provided for and this fact is informed to the trial subject. As very few studies are available in the literature, we could not compare majority of the findings of this study with others.</p>","PeriodicalId":20015,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Clinical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2b/ba/PCR-13-151.PMC9345254.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.PICR_124_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: Very few studies conducted in India have analyzed insurance policies and clinical trial agreement (CTA) submitted to ethics committee (EC). This study was conducted to review and find out deficiencies in it.

Materials and methods: This was a retrospective observational study. All the protocols for regulatory clinical trials and academic research sponsored by the Indian Council of Medical Research or other funding agency were included. Insurance documents and CTA submitted with the study protocols were analyzed.

Results: A total of seventy CTA and insurance policies were analyzed. CTA mentioned that parties involved in 60 (86%) forms, scope of the agreement in 15 (21%) forms, responsibilities of the party in 68 (97%) forms, and payment details in 58 (83%) forms. Nearly 88.5% of the insurance policies mentioned whether the policy covers the participants for injury due to all clauses and 91% of the policies mentioned the validity period of insurance.

Conclusion: It was found that both the documents contained almost all the required elements. This was probably because this institutional EC insisted on and thoroughly reviewed the documents to ensure that adequate compensation of research-related injuries has been provided for and this fact is informed to the trial subject. As very few studies are available in the literature, we could not compare majority of the findings of this study with others.

提交给印度中部某三级医疗教学机构伦理委员会的临床试验协议和保险政策分析。
目的:在印度进行的很少研究分析了提交给伦理委员会(EC)的保险政策和临床试验协议(CTA)。本研究旨在回顾和发现其不足之处。材料和方法:本研究为回顾性观察性研究。由印度医学研究理事会或其他供资机构赞助的所有临床试验和学术研究规程都包括在内。分析随研究方案提交的保险文件和CTA。结果:共分析了70份CTA和保单。CTA提到,60份(86%)表格涉及各方,15份(21%)表格涉及协议范围,68份(97%)表格涉及各方责任,58份(83%)表格涉及付款细节。近88.5%的保单提到是否对参保人的所有条款造成的伤害进行保险,91%的保单提到保险的有效期。结论:发现这两份文件几乎包含了所有必需的要素。这可能是因为这个机构的EC坚持并彻底审查了这些文件,以确保为研究相关的伤害提供了足够的赔偿,并将这一事实告知了试验对象。由于文献中可获得的研究很少,我们无法将本研究的大部分结果与其他研究结果进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perspectives in Clinical Research
Perspectives in Clinical Research Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer review quarterly journal is positioned to build a learning clinical research community in India. This scientific journal will have a broad coverage of topics across clinical research disciplines including clinical research methodology, research ethics, clinical data management, training, data management, biostatistics, regulatory and will include original articles, reviews, news and views, perspectives, and other interesting sections. PICR will offer all clinical research stakeholders in India – academicians, ethics committees, regulators, and industry professionals -a forum for exchange of ideas, information and opinions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信