Quality of life and its correlated factors among patients with substance use disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bahram Armoon, Marie-Josée Fleury, Amir-Hossien Bayat, Azadeh Bayani, Rasool Mohammadi, Mark D Griffiths
{"title":"Quality of life and its correlated factors among patients with substance use disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Bahram Armoon,&nbsp;Marie-Josée Fleury,&nbsp;Amir-Hossien Bayat,&nbsp;Azadeh Bayani,&nbsp;Rasool Mohammadi,&nbsp;Mark D Griffiths","doi":"10.1186/s13690-022-00940-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with substance use disorder (SUD) usually report lower quality of life (QoL) than other patients and as much as patients with other mental disorders. The present study investigated variables associated with QoL domains among patients with SUD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies in English published before December 1<sup>st</sup> 2021, were searched for on PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science to identify primary studies on factors associated with QoL domains among patients with SUD. After reviewing for study duplicates, the full-texts of selected papers were assessed for eligibility using PECO (Participants, Exposures, Comparison and Outcome) criteria: (a) participants: patients with SUD; (b) exposures: sociodemographic factors, clinical, and service use variables; (c) comparison: patient groups without SUD; and (d) outcomes: four domains of QoL (physical, mental, social, and environmental domains). Three researchers recorded the data independently using predefined Excel spreadsheets. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used for assessing risk of bias and rated each study in terms of exposure, outcome, and comparability. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and β coefficient were utilized at a 95% confidence level, and because sampling methods differed between studies' pooled estimates, a random effects model was utilized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the assessment of over 10,230 papers, a total of 17 studies met the eligibility criteria. Five studies (1260 participants) found that patients with SUD who were older were less likely to have a good physical Qol (OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.78, 0.95). Two studies (1171 participants) indicated that patients with SUD who were homeless were less likely to have a good environmental Qol (β = -0.47, p = 0.003). However, a better mental QoL was observed in four studies (1126 participants) among those receiving support from their family or friends (social networks) (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.04, 1.07). Two studies (588 participants) showed that those using cocaine were less likely to have a good mental QoL (OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.75, 0.93). Two studies (22,534 participants) showed that those using alcohol were less likely to have a good physical QoL (β = -2.21, p = 0.001). Two studies (956 participants) showed that those having severe substance use disorders were less likely to have a good mental (β = -5.44, p = 0.002) and environmental (β = -0.59, p = 0.006) QoL respectively. Four studies (3515 participants) showed that those having mental disorders were less likely to have a good physical QoL (β = -1.05, p = 0.001), and another three studies (1211 participants) that those having mental disorders were less likely to have a good mental QoL (β = -0.33, p = 0.001). Finally, two studies (609 and 682 participants) showed that individuals who experienced trauma symptoms or mental disorders were less likely to have good social and environmental QoL, respectively (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.61, 1.00) and (OR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.9, 0.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest the need for mental health services to improve the QOL among patients with SUD but further study is needed. Cocaine may cause behavioral changes which can increase the possibility of reckless and suicidal behaviors. Therefore, identifying cocaine user access, adherence, and satisfaction with treatment is recommended as an important component of adaptive functioning. Interventions that help patients with SUD get support from people within their social networks who support their recovery are also essential to their QoL.</p>","PeriodicalId":365748,"journal":{"name":"Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique","volume":" ","pages":"179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9351239/pdf/","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-022-00940-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background: Patients with substance use disorder (SUD) usually report lower quality of life (QoL) than other patients and as much as patients with other mental disorders. The present study investigated variables associated with QoL domains among patients with SUD.

Methods: Studies in English published before December 1st 2021, were searched for on PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science to identify primary studies on factors associated with QoL domains among patients with SUD. After reviewing for study duplicates, the full-texts of selected papers were assessed for eligibility using PECO (Participants, Exposures, Comparison and Outcome) criteria: (a) participants: patients with SUD; (b) exposures: sociodemographic factors, clinical, and service use variables; (c) comparison: patient groups without SUD; and (d) outcomes: four domains of QoL (physical, mental, social, and environmental domains). Three researchers recorded the data independently using predefined Excel spreadsheets. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used for assessing risk of bias and rated each study in terms of exposure, outcome, and comparability. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and β coefficient were utilized at a 95% confidence level, and because sampling methods differed between studies' pooled estimates, a random effects model was utilized.

Results: After the assessment of over 10,230 papers, a total of 17 studies met the eligibility criteria. Five studies (1260 participants) found that patients with SUD who were older were less likely to have a good physical Qol (OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.78, 0.95). Two studies (1171 participants) indicated that patients with SUD who were homeless were less likely to have a good environmental Qol (β = -0.47, p = 0.003). However, a better mental QoL was observed in four studies (1126 participants) among those receiving support from their family or friends (social networks) (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.04, 1.07). Two studies (588 participants) showed that those using cocaine were less likely to have a good mental QoL (OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.75, 0.93). Two studies (22,534 participants) showed that those using alcohol were less likely to have a good physical QoL (β = -2.21, p = 0.001). Two studies (956 participants) showed that those having severe substance use disorders were less likely to have a good mental (β = -5.44, p = 0.002) and environmental (β = -0.59, p = 0.006) QoL respectively. Four studies (3515 participants) showed that those having mental disorders were less likely to have a good physical QoL (β = -1.05, p = 0.001), and another three studies (1211 participants) that those having mental disorders were less likely to have a good mental QoL (β = -0.33, p = 0.001). Finally, two studies (609 and 682 participants) showed that individuals who experienced trauma symptoms or mental disorders were less likely to have good social and environmental QoL, respectively (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.61, 1.00) and (OR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.9, 0.94).

Conclusions: The findings suggest the need for mental health services to improve the QOL among patients with SUD but further study is needed. Cocaine may cause behavioral changes which can increase the possibility of reckless and suicidal behaviors. Therefore, identifying cocaine user access, adherence, and satisfaction with treatment is recommended as an important component of adaptive functioning. Interventions that help patients with SUD get support from people within their social networks who support their recovery are also essential to their QoL.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

物质使用障碍患者的生活质量及其相关因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:物质使用障碍(SUD)患者通常报告的生活质量(QoL)低于其他患者,与其他精神障碍患者一样多。本研究探讨了与SUD患者生活质量域相关的变量。方法:在PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane和Web of Science上检索2021年12月1日前发表的英文研究,以确定与SUD患者生活质量域相关因素的初步研究。在审查研究重复后,使用PECO(参与者,暴露,比较和结果)标准评估选定论文的全文的资格:(a)参与者:SUD患者;(b)暴露:社会人口因素、临床和服务使用变量;(c)对比:未出现SUD的患者组;(d)结果:生活质量的四个领域(身体、心理、社会和环境领域)。三位研究人员使用预定义的Excel电子表格独立记录数据。纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)用于评估偏倚风险,并根据暴露、结果和可比性对每项研究进行评分。合并优势比(or)和β系数在95%置信水平下使用,并且由于研究合并估计的抽样方法不同,因此使用随机效应模型。结果:在对10230多篇论文进行评估后,共有17项研究符合入选标准。五项研究(1260名参与者)发现,年龄较大的SUD患者不太可能有良好的身体生活质量(OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.78, 0.95)。两项研究(1171名参与者)表明,无家可归的SUD患者环境生活质量较差(β = -0.47, p = 0.003)。然而,在四项研究(1126名参与者)中,从家人或朋友(社会网络)获得支持的人观察到更好的心理生活质量(or = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.04, 1.07)。两项研究(588名参与者)表明,使用可卡因的人不太可能拥有良好的精神生活质量(OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.75, 0.93)。两项研究(22,534名参与者)表明,饮酒的人不太可能拥有良好的身体生活质量(β = -2.21, p = 0.001)。两项研究(956名参与者)显示,那些有严重物质使用障碍的人不太可能分别拥有良好的精神(β = -5.44, p = 0.002)和环境(β = -0.59, p = 0.006)生活质量。四项研究(3515名参与者)表明,患有精神障碍的人不太可能拥有良好的身体生活质量(β = -1.05, p = 0.001),另外三项研究(1211名参与者)表明,患有精神障碍的人不太可能拥有良好的精神生活质量(β = -0.33, p = 0.001)。最后,两项研究(609和682名参与者)表明,经历过创伤症状或精神障碍的个体分别不太可能拥有良好的社会和环境生活质量(or = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.61, 1.00)和(or = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.9, 0.94)。结论:需要心理健康服务来改善SUD患者的生活质量,但需要进一步的研究。可卡因可能会导致行为改变,从而增加鲁莽和自杀行为的可能性。因此,鉴别可卡因使用者的可及性、依从性和对治疗的满意度被推荐作为适应性功能的重要组成部分。帮助SUD患者从支持其康复的社交网络中获得支持的干预措施对他们的生活质量也至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信