[Liability for chronic working time violations in medicine: when does the risk of fines and imprisonment loom?]

Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-25 DOI:10.1007/s00120-022-01824-5
J P Struck, F Neugebauer, L Stahl, J König, M Braun, J Westphal
{"title":"[Liability for chronic working time violations in medicine: when does the risk of fines and imprisonment loom?]","authors":"J P Struck,&nbsp;F Neugebauer,&nbsp;L Stahl,&nbsp;J König,&nbsp;M Braun,&nbsp;J Westphal","doi":"10.1007/s00120-022-01824-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Against the background of the changes in the collective bargaining agreement-for municipal hospitals in the version of January 1, 2021, and for university hospitals in the version of March 7, 2020-this article deals with the legal consequences of chronic violations of the German Working Hours Act in medicine, but especially in surgical specialties such as urology. It includes an overview of current law and sanctions for violations and highlights responsibilities as well as exceptions. It is important to clarify the distribution of responsibilities with regard to working hours in the institution concerned in order to avoid fines and, in the worst case, imprisonment. It should also be clear who is liable in specific cases for persistent working time violations. When changing duty models, it is important to bear in mind that this can lead to a considerable deterioration in the opportunities for further training and education of physicians, meaning that in the long term the compatibility of further training in line with working hours can only be achieved with sufficient staffing of the hospitals. In some cases, this is diametrically opposed to economic interests in the health care system and thus presents an almost insoluble dilemma. In the view of the working group, structural changes in the diagnosis-related group (DRG)-based inpatient sector are needed in the near future.</p>","PeriodicalId":319655,"journal":{"name":"Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"638-643"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-022-01824-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Against the background of the changes in the collective bargaining agreement-for municipal hospitals in the version of January 1, 2021, and for university hospitals in the version of March 7, 2020-this article deals with the legal consequences of chronic violations of the German Working Hours Act in medicine, but especially in surgical specialties such as urology. It includes an overview of current law and sanctions for violations and highlights responsibilities as well as exceptions. It is important to clarify the distribution of responsibilities with regard to working hours in the institution concerned in order to avoid fines and, in the worst case, imprisonment. It should also be clear who is liable in specific cases for persistent working time violations. When changing duty models, it is important to bear in mind that this can lead to a considerable deterioration in the opportunities for further training and education of physicians, meaning that in the long term the compatibility of further training in line with working hours can only be achieved with sufficient staffing of the hospitals. In some cases, this is diametrically opposed to economic interests in the health care system and thus presents an almost insoluble dilemma. In the view of the working group, structural changes in the diagnosis-related group (DRG)-based inpatient sector are needed in the near future.

医药行业长期违反工作时间的责任:罚款和监禁的风险何时出现?]
在集体谈判协议发生变化的背景下——针对2021年1月1日版本的市立医院,以及针对2020年3月7日版本的大学医院——本文讨论了长期违反《德国工作时间法》在医学领域的法律后果,尤其是在泌尿外科等外科专业。它概述了现行法律和对违法行为的制裁,并强调了责任和例外情况。必须澄清有关机构工作时间方面的责任分配,以避免罚款,在最坏的情况下,避免监禁。还应明确在持续违反工作时间的具体案件中由谁负责。在改变职责模式时,重要的是要记住,这可能导致医生进一步培训和教育的机会大大减少,这意味着,从长远来看,只有在医院配备足够人员的情况下,才能实现进一步培训与工作时间的一致性。在某些情况下,这与医疗保健系统的经济利益截然相反,因此呈现出几乎无法解决的困境。工作组认为,在不久的将来,以诊断相关组(DRG)为基础的住院部门需要进行结构性改革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信