High-Fidelity Orthopaedic Surgical Skills Models and Resident Performance in the Surgical Treatment of Tibial Plateau Fractures.

Joshua Kotler, Jennifer Sanville, Joy Greer, Christopher Smith
{"title":"High-Fidelity Orthopaedic Surgical Skills Models and Resident Performance in the Surgical Treatment of Tibial Plateau Fractures.","authors":"Joshua Kotler,&nbsp;Jennifer Sanville,&nbsp;Joy Greer,&nbsp;Christopher Smith","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to quantify the impact of low-fidelity simulation on resident surgical skills education. Fourteen orthopaedic surgery residents (PGY-1 through PGY-5) were separated into two, training-level-matched cohorts - an untrained control cohort (UCC) and a low-fidelity Sawbones training cohort (SAW). Together, both cohorts received didactic instruction on the soft-tissue approach, intra-operative reduction, internal-fixation, and surgical wound closure of Schatzker II tibial plateau fractures. The SAW cohort first rehearsed open-reduction, internal-fixation on radiopaque Sawbones models (Pacific Research Laboratories Inc. Vashon, WA). Both cohorts were then evaluated while performing the same procedure on high-fidelity cadaveric models (Rimasys GmbH Cologne, Germany). Surgical skill and knowledge were assessed using the objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) tool, a written exam, and an after-action survey. There were no significant differences in OSATS scores or written exam scores between the two cohorts. A near-linear positive relationship (R2 = 0.9737) existed between training year and average overall OSATS score. All residents expressed a preference for surgical skills training with high-fidelity cadaveric models. The results of this study fail to demonstrate a training advantage of low-fidelity Sawbones models when surgical skill is measured on high-fidelity cadaveric models. Despite this, residents across both cohorts qualitatively felt the high-fidelity models offered a better educational opportunity for surgical practice than did the low-fidelity Sawbones models. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 31(2):109-112, 2022).</p>","PeriodicalId":17143,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","volume":"31 2","pages":"109-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to quantify the impact of low-fidelity simulation on resident surgical skills education. Fourteen orthopaedic surgery residents (PGY-1 through PGY-5) were separated into two, training-level-matched cohorts - an untrained control cohort (UCC) and a low-fidelity Sawbones training cohort (SAW). Together, both cohorts received didactic instruction on the soft-tissue approach, intra-operative reduction, internal-fixation, and surgical wound closure of Schatzker II tibial plateau fractures. The SAW cohort first rehearsed open-reduction, internal-fixation on radiopaque Sawbones models (Pacific Research Laboratories Inc. Vashon, WA). Both cohorts were then evaluated while performing the same procedure on high-fidelity cadaveric models (Rimasys GmbH Cologne, Germany). Surgical skill and knowledge were assessed using the objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) tool, a written exam, and an after-action survey. There were no significant differences in OSATS scores or written exam scores between the two cohorts. A near-linear positive relationship (R2 = 0.9737) existed between training year and average overall OSATS score. All residents expressed a preference for surgical skills training with high-fidelity cadaveric models. The results of this study fail to demonstrate a training advantage of low-fidelity Sawbones models when surgical skill is measured on high-fidelity cadaveric models. Despite this, residents across both cohorts qualitatively felt the high-fidelity models offered a better educational opportunity for surgical practice than did the low-fidelity Sawbones models. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 31(2):109-112, 2022).

高保真骨科手术技能模型与住院医师在胫骨平台骨折手术治疗中的表现。
本研究的目的是量化低保真度模拟对住院医师外科技能教育的影响。14名骨科住院医师(PGY-1至PGY-5)被分为两个训练水平匹配的队列——未经训练的对照队列(UCC)和低保真Sawbones培训队列(SAW)。两组患者一起接受了关于Schatzker II型胫骨平台骨折的软组织入路、术中复位、内固定和手术伤口闭合的教学指导。SAW组首先在不透射线的锯骨模型上进行切开复位内固定(太平洋研究实验室公司)。瓦逊,佤邦)。然后对两个队列进行评估,同时在高保真尸体模型上执行相同的程序(Rimasys GmbH Cologne, Germany)。采用客观结构化技术技能评估(OSATS)工具、笔试和术后调查对手术技能和知识进行评估。两组学生的OSATS成绩和笔试成绩没有显著差异。培训年限与OSATS平均总分呈近似线性正相关(R2 = 0.9737)。所有住院医师均表示更倾向于采用高保真尸体模型进行手术技能培训。当在高保真尸体模型上测量手术技能时,本研究的结果未能证明低保真Sawbones模型的训练优势。尽管如此,两组住院医师定性地认为高保真度模型比低保真度Sawbones模型为外科实践提供了更好的教育机会。[j] .外科骨科进展,31(2):109- 112,2022。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信