Intravenous Fluid Bolus Rates Associated with Outcomes in Pediatric Sepsis: A Multi-Center Analysis.

IF 1.5 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Open Access Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2022-07-28 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OAEM.S368442
Paul C Mullan, Christopher M Pruitt, Kelly A Levasseur, Charles G Macias, Raina Paul, Holly Depinet, Anh Thy H Nguyen, Elliot Melendez
{"title":"Intravenous Fluid Bolus Rates Associated with Outcomes in Pediatric Sepsis: A Multi-Center Analysis.","authors":"Paul C Mullan,&nbsp;Christopher M Pruitt,&nbsp;Kelly A Levasseur,&nbsp;Charles G Macias,&nbsp;Raina Paul,&nbsp;Holly Depinet,&nbsp;Anh Thy H Nguyen,&nbsp;Elliot Melendez","doi":"10.2147/OAEM.S368442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pediatric sepsis guidelines recommend rapid intravenous fluid (IVF) bolus administration rates (BAR). Recent sepsis studies suggest that rapid BAR may be associated with increased morbidity. We aimed to describe the association between emergency department (ED) IVF BAR and clinical outcomes in pediatric sepsis.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Secondary post-hoc analysis of retrospective cohort data from 19 hospitals in the Pediatric Septic Shock Collaborative (PSSC) database. Patients with presumed septic shock were defined by severe sepsis/septic shock diagnostic codes, receipt of septic shock therapies, or floor-to-ICU transfers within 12 hours from ED admission for septic shock. Patients (2 months-21 years) with complete data on weight, antibiotic receipt, bolus timing, and bolus volumes were included. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Associations between BAR and mortality and secondary (intubation or non-invasive positive pressure ventilation = NIPPV) outcomes were assessed using unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PSSC database included 6731 patients; 3969 met inclusion and received a median ED volume of 40.2 mL/kg. Seventy-six (1.9%) patients died, 151 (3.8%) were intubated, and 235 (5.9%) had NIPPV administered. The median BAR was 25.7 mL/kg/hr. For each 20 mL/kg/hr increase in BAR, the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for 30-day mortality [aOR = 1.11 (95% CI 1.01, 1.23)], intubation [aOR = 1.25 (95% CI 1.09, 1.44)], and NIPPV [aOR = 1.20 (95% CI 1.05, 1.38)] significantly increased.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Faster ED IVF bolus administration rates in this pediatric sepsis database were associated with higher adjusted odds of death, intubation and NIPPV. Controlled trials are needed to determine if these associations are replicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":45096,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/32/44/oaem-14-375.PMC9342868.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S368442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: Pediatric sepsis guidelines recommend rapid intravenous fluid (IVF) bolus administration rates (BAR). Recent sepsis studies suggest that rapid BAR may be associated with increased morbidity. We aimed to describe the association between emergency department (ED) IVF BAR and clinical outcomes in pediatric sepsis.

Patients and methods: Secondary post-hoc analysis of retrospective cohort data from 19 hospitals in the Pediatric Septic Shock Collaborative (PSSC) database. Patients with presumed septic shock were defined by severe sepsis/septic shock diagnostic codes, receipt of septic shock therapies, or floor-to-ICU transfers within 12 hours from ED admission for septic shock. Patients (2 months-21 years) with complete data on weight, antibiotic receipt, bolus timing, and bolus volumes were included. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Associations between BAR and mortality and secondary (intubation or non-invasive positive pressure ventilation = NIPPV) outcomes were assessed using unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression.

Results: The PSSC database included 6731 patients; 3969 met inclusion and received a median ED volume of 40.2 mL/kg. Seventy-six (1.9%) patients died, 151 (3.8%) were intubated, and 235 (5.9%) had NIPPV administered. The median BAR was 25.7 mL/kg/hr. For each 20 mL/kg/hr increase in BAR, the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for 30-day mortality [aOR = 1.11 (95% CI 1.01, 1.23)], intubation [aOR = 1.25 (95% CI 1.09, 1.44)], and NIPPV [aOR = 1.20 (95% CI 1.05, 1.38)] significantly increased.

Conclusion: Faster ED IVF bolus administration rates in this pediatric sepsis database were associated with higher adjusted odds of death, intubation and NIPPV. Controlled trials are needed to determine if these associations are replicable.

Abstract Image

静脉输液率与儿童脓毒症的预后相关:一项多中心分析
目的:儿科败血症指南推荐快速静脉输液(IVF)丸给药率(BAR)。最近的脓毒症研究表明,快速BAR可能与发病率增加有关。我们的目的是描述急诊科(ED) IVF BAR与儿科败血症临床结果之间的关系。患者和方法:对儿童感染性休克协作(PSSC)数据库中19家医院的回顾性队列数据进行二次事后分析。假定的脓毒性休克患者通过严重脓毒症/脓毒性休克诊断代码、接受脓毒性休克治疗或因脓毒性休克入院后12小时内转至icu进行定义。患者(2个月-21岁)具有完整的体重、抗生素使用、给药时间和给药量数据。主要终点为30天死亡率。BAR与死亡率和继发性(插管或无创正压通气= NIPPV)结果之间的关系采用未调整和调整的逻辑回归进行评估。结果:PSSC数据库包括6731例患者;3969例患者符合纳入标准,ED的中位容积为40.2 mL/kg。76例(1.9%)患者死亡,151例(3.8%)患者插管,235例(5.9%)患者给予NIPPV。中位BAR为25.7 mL/kg/hr。BAR每增加20 mL/kg/hr, 30天死亡率的调整优势比(aOR) [aOR = 1.11 (95% CI 1.01, 1.23)]、插管[aOR = 1.25 (95% CI 1.09, 1.44)]和NIPPV [aOR = 1.20 (95% CI 1.05, 1.38)]显著增加。结论:在这个儿童败血症数据库中,更快的ED IVF给药率与更高的调整后死亡、插管和NIPPV的几率相关。需要对照试验来确定这些关联是否可复制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Access Emergency Medicine
Open Access Emergency Medicine EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信