Decentralisation in Times of Crisis: Asset Or Liability? The Case of Germany and Italy During Covid-19.

Katharina Kuhn, Irene Morlino
{"title":"Decentralisation in Times of Crisis: Asset Or Liability? The Case of Germany and Italy During Covid-19.","authors":"Katharina Kuhn, Irene Morlino","doi":"10.1111/spsr.12482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How did the legal and political-administrative relationship between central and local governments of two decentralised states shape their response to COVID-19? Literature and theories on decentralisation argue that federal and decentralised states are less able to respond to crises in a coordinated manner due to their perceived greater susceptibility to political conflict. Situated within this theoretical debate and based on the analysis of legal acts, political decisions, and relevant national news media articles between March and August 2020 in Germany and Italy, this research note shows that, counterintuitively, more decentralisation does not necessarily translate into more legal and political stress during pandemic management. In responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, Germany, a highly decentralised state, experienced less legal and political tensions than the less decentralised Italy. The key to understanding this variation lies in different institutional arrangements, complemented by the specific political cultures of both states.</p>","PeriodicalId":93813,"journal":{"name":"Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur Politikwissenschaft = Revue suisse de science politique = Swiss political science review","volume":"28 1","pages":"105-115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8662272/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur Politikwissenschaft = Revue suisse de science politique = Swiss political science review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How did the legal and political-administrative relationship between central and local governments of two decentralised states shape their response to COVID-19? Literature and theories on decentralisation argue that federal and decentralised states are less able to respond to crises in a coordinated manner due to their perceived greater susceptibility to political conflict. Situated within this theoretical debate and based on the analysis of legal acts, political decisions, and relevant national news media articles between March and August 2020 in Germany and Italy, this research note shows that, counterintuitively, more decentralisation does not necessarily translate into more legal and political stress during pandemic management. In responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, Germany, a highly decentralised state, experienced less legal and political tensions than the less decentralised Italy. The key to understanding this variation lies in different institutional arrangements, complemented by the specific political cultures of both states.

危机时期的权力下放:资产还是负债?19科维德时期德国和意大利的案例。
两个权力下放州的中央政府和地方政府之间的法律和政治行政关系如何影响了它们对 COVID-19 的反应?有关权力下放的文献和理论认为,联邦制和权力下放的州由于被认为更容易受到政治冲突的影响,因此以协调的方式应对危机的能力较弱。在这一理论争论的背景下,基于对 2020 年 3 月至 8 月间德国和意大利的法律行为、政治决策和相关国家新闻媒体文章的分析,本研究报告表明,与直觉相反,在大流行病管理过程中,更多的权力下放并不一定会转化为更大的法律和政治压力。在应对 COVID-19 大流行病的过程中,作为一个高度分权的国家,德国经历的法律和政治压力要小于分权较少的意大利。理解这种差异的关键在于不同的制度安排,以及两国特定的政治文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信