Utility of Measuring Fetal Cavum Septum Pellucidum (CSP) Width During Routine Obstetrical Ultrasound for Improving Diagnosis of 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome: A Case-Control Study.
Christy L Pylypjuk, Shiza F Memon, Bernard N Chodirker
{"title":"Utility of Measuring Fetal Cavum Septum Pellucidum (CSP) Width During Routine Obstetrical Ultrasound for Improving Diagnosis of 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome: A Case-Control Study.","authors":"Christy L Pylypjuk, Shiza F Memon, Bernard N Chodirker","doi":"10.2147/TACG.S364543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the utility of measuring fetal cavum septum pellucidum (CSP) width during routine, mid-pregnancy ultrasound for improving diagnosis of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome amongst fetuses with and without conotruncal anomalies.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective case-control study (2005-2016). Fetuses and newborns with 22q11.2 deletion and/or conotruncal cardiac anomalies were identified using a regional, clinical database. A control group was assembled in a 2:1 ratio to create three groups for comparison: i) 22q11.2 deletion syndrome; ii) isolated conotruncal anomalies; and iii) controls. Eligibility was restricted to those with stored ultrasound images between 18-22 weeks' gestation and a minimum biparietal diameter of 40 mm. Post-processing measurement of CSP width was performed in a standardized fashion by two blinded and independent study personnel. Descriptive and inferential statistics, regression modeling, and receiver operator curves (ROC) were used to compare outcomes between groups and evaluate sensitivity/specificity of CSP width as a marker of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine cases of 22q11.2 deletion and 64 cases of isolated conotruncal anomalies were matched to 186 healthy controls. Cases with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome had significantly larger CSP widths (5.36 mm; SD=1.2) compared to those with isolated conotruncal anomalies (3.75 mm; SD=1.11) and healthy controls (2.93 mm; SD=0.57; <i>p</i><0.0001). There was no difference in CSP width amongst those with 22q11.2 deletion irrespective of the presence/absence of a conotruncal anomaly (<i>p</i>=0.362), or by type of conotruncal anomaly (<i>p</i>=0.211). Using a CSP width cutoff >4.3 mm, fetuses with 22q11.2 deletion can be accurately identified with good sensitivity (89.7%) and specificity (84%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fetuses with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome have dilated CSPs when compared to those with isolated conotruncal anomalies or controls. Because CSP dilation can be evaluated during routine mid-pregnancy ultrasound using standard images of the fetal head, measurement could easily be incorporated to enhance prenatal diagnosis of this phenotypically diverse condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":506374,"journal":{"name":"The Application of Clinical Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"87-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/90/b2/tacg-15-87.PMC9341354.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Application of Clinical Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/TACG.S364543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the utility of measuring fetal cavum septum pellucidum (CSP) width during routine, mid-pregnancy ultrasound for improving diagnosis of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome amongst fetuses with and without conotruncal anomalies.
Patients and methods: This was a retrospective case-control study (2005-2016). Fetuses and newborns with 22q11.2 deletion and/or conotruncal cardiac anomalies were identified using a regional, clinical database. A control group was assembled in a 2:1 ratio to create three groups for comparison: i) 22q11.2 deletion syndrome; ii) isolated conotruncal anomalies; and iii) controls. Eligibility was restricted to those with stored ultrasound images between 18-22 weeks' gestation and a minimum biparietal diameter of 40 mm. Post-processing measurement of CSP width was performed in a standardized fashion by two blinded and independent study personnel. Descriptive and inferential statistics, regression modeling, and receiver operator curves (ROC) were used to compare outcomes between groups and evaluate sensitivity/specificity of CSP width as a marker of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.
Results: Twenty-nine cases of 22q11.2 deletion and 64 cases of isolated conotruncal anomalies were matched to 186 healthy controls. Cases with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome had significantly larger CSP widths (5.36 mm; SD=1.2) compared to those with isolated conotruncal anomalies (3.75 mm; SD=1.11) and healthy controls (2.93 mm; SD=0.57; p<0.0001). There was no difference in CSP width amongst those with 22q11.2 deletion irrespective of the presence/absence of a conotruncal anomaly (p=0.362), or by type of conotruncal anomaly (p=0.211). Using a CSP width cutoff >4.3 mm, fetuses with 22q11.2 deletion can be accurately identified with good sensitivity (89.7%) and specificity (84%).
Conclusion: Fetuses with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome have dilated CSPs when compared to those with isolated conotruncal anomalies or controls. Because CSP dilation can be evaluated during routine mid-pregnancy ultrasound using standard images of the fetal head, measurement could easily be incorporated to enhance prenatal diagnosis of this phenotypically diverse condition.